Citroen Dispatch MOT Results

Registered in 2015
56.0% pass rate
from 4,377 tests in 2021
(44% worse than other 2015 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2015 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Dispatch is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (88% worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 6.3% fail on Stop lamp (160% worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 6.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (180% worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 5.6% fail on Headlamps (150% worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 5.6% fail on Headlamp (150% worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.091% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.023% fail on Dipswitch
    • 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim (59% worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim (44% worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.78% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (2 times worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.6% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.0% fail on Individual direction indicators (55% worse than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.62% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.046% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (43% worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (43% worse than other 2015 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (44% worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.30% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.16% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.11% fail on Horn
      • 0.023% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.21% fail on Hazard warning (6 times worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Switch (6 times worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.16% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.069% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.069% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.046% fail on Rear reflectors (82% better than other 2015 vans)
  • 15% fail on Body, chassis, structure (3 times worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 9.7% fail on Transmission (4 times worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 9.4% fail on Drive shafts (5 times worse than other 2015 vans)
        • 9.4% fail on Joints (5 times worse than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.023% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.30% fail on Prop shafts (140% worse than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.30% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 5.0% fail on Exhaust system (11 times worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.41% fail on Seats (3 times worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Driver's seat (4 times worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.023% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.30% fail on Doors
      • 0.23% fail on Other passenger's door (2 times worse than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.18% fail on Door condition (2 times worse than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.046% fail on Catch (7 times worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.069% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.046% fail on Door condition
        • 0.023% fail on Catch
    • 0.25% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.18% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.11% fail on Pipe (4 times worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.046% fail on Tank
      • 0.023% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.18% fail on Spare wheel (3 times worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Carrier (3 times worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.046% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.11% fail on Body (69% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.091% fail on Other body component (69% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.023% fail on Panel
    • 0.091% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.069% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.023% fail on Bracket
    • 0.046% fail on Undertray
    • 0.023% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.023% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.023% fail on Towbar
      • 0.023% fail on Safety device
    • 0.023% fail on Load security
      • 0.023% fail on Loading door
  • 9.4% fail on Visibility (65% worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 5.3% fail on Washers (110% worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Wipers (49% worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.50% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.50% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.39% fail on View to rear
      • 0.39% fail on Mirrors
  • 7.7% fail on Brakes
    • 4.8% fail on Mechanical brake components (44% worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 4.0% fail on Brake linings and pads (48% worse than other 2015 vans)
        • 3.9% fail on Brake pads (48% worse than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.023% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.4% fail on Brake discs and drums (44% worse than other 2015 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Brake discs (46% worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.14% fail on Cable
        • 0.023% fail on Lever
        • 0.023% fail on Linkage
    • 2.1% fail on Brake performance (36% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.87% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (59% better than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.87% fail on Rbt (sp) (58% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.80% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.78% fail on Rbt
          • 0.69% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.091% fail on Service brake imbalance (69% better than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.023% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.023% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.55% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.50% fail on Rbt
          • 0.50% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.046% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.023% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.023% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.37% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.37% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.21% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.21% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.091% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.0% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (140% worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.98% fail on Pedal (180% worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.046% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.66% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.64% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.25% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.16% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.16% fail on Lever
    • 0.091% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.069% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.046% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.023% fail on Master cylinder
  • 6.2% fail on Tyres (25% worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Tread depth (43% worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Condition
    • 0.16% fail on Size/type
  • 5.6% fail on Suspension (15% better than other 2015 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Suspension arms (73% worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 2.8% fail on Ball joint (180% worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.023% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.023% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.023% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.5% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.57% fail on Anti-roll bars (72% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Linkage ball joints (66% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.091% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.023% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.25% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.25% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.16% fail on Springs (93% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Coil springs (92% better than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.16% fail on Coil spring (92% better than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.069% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.046% fail on Ball joint dust cover (7 times worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.023% fail on Suspension rod
    • 0.046% fail on Shock absorbers (91% better than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.046% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 2.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.2% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.8% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.96% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (90% worse than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.66% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (46% better than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.14% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.046% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.023% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.023% fail on Particulate filter
        • 0.023% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
      • 0.37% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.37% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.11% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.091% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.023% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 0.85% fail on Steering (56% better than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.50% fail on Power steering (140% worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Other components (4 times worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Operation (2 times worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.091% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.21% fail on Steering linkage components (87% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Track rod end (92% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.069% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.023% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.14% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.14% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.64% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (44% better than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.37% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.37% fail on Condition
    • 0.25% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.023% fail on Airbags
      • 0.023% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.39% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.39% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.16% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.091% fail on Condition
    • 0.069% fail on Attachment