Citroen Dispatch MOT Results

Registered in 2016
62.2% pass rate
from 3,986 tests in 2021
(42% worse than other 2016 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Dispatch is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (85% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 5.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 5.3% fail on Headlamps (180% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 5.3% fail on Headlamp (190% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.050% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 5.1% fail on Stop lamp (140% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim (55% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim (48% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.58% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (190% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.1% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.60% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.43% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.050% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.68% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.68% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.68% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.28% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.25% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.025% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.25% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.075% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.075% fail on Horn
      • 0.050% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.050% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.13% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.13% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.10% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.075% fail on Hazard warning (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.075% fail on Switch (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
  • 9.1% fail on Visibility (71% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Wipers (79% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on Washers (82% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.53% fail on View to rear
      • 0.50% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.025% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.43% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.43% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.050% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.025% fail on Driver's view
  • 8.6% fail on Body, chassis, structure (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 5.0% fail on Transmission (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 4.8% fail on Drive shafts (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 4.8% fail on Joints (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.025% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.20% fail on Prop shafts (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.20% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Exhaust system (9 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.65% fail on Seats (7 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.63% fail on Driver's seat (11 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.025% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.25% fail on Body
      • 0.25% fail on Other body component
    • 0.15% fail on Doors
      • 0.10% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.075% fail on Door condition
        • 0.025% fail on Catch
      • 0.025% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.025% fail on Door condition
      • 0.025% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.025% fail on Door condition
    • 0.13% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.075% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.025% fail on Tank
      • 0.025% fail on Pipe
    • 0.10% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.075% fail on Bracket (8 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.025% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.075% fail on Load security
      • 0.075% fail on Loading door (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.050% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.025% fail on Spare wheel condition
      • 0.025% fail on Carrier
    • 0.025% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.025% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.025% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.025% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.025% fail on Undertray
  • 6.7% fail on Brakes
    • 4.2% fail on Mechanical brake components (34% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 3.7% fail on Brake linings and pads (44% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 3.6% fail on Brake pads (44% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.025% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.85% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.85% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.075% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.075% fail on Cable
    • 1.6% fail on Brake performance (38% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.65% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (60% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.65% fail on Rbt (sp) (59% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.63% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.63% fail on Rbt
          • 0.45% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.18% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.38% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.35% fail on Rbt
          • 0.28% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.050% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.025% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.025% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.025% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.30% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.30% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.20% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.10% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.050% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.90% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (170% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.90% fail on Pedal (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.025% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.35% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.25% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.18% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.20% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.20% fail on Lever
    • 0.18% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.025% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.025% fail on Reservoirs
  • 5.3% fail on Tyres
    • 3.3% fail on Tread depth (37% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Condition
  • 3.5% fail on Suspension (22% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint (86% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.45% fail on Ball joint dust cover (190% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.075% fail on Pins and bushes (85% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.75% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.55% fail on Anti-roll bars (52% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.18% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.050% fail on Linkage
      • 0.025% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.025% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.025% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.025% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.53% fail on Springs (66% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.53% fail on Coil springs (61% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.53% fail on Coil spring (61% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.10% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.075% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.025% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.075% fail on Shock absorbers (83% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.025% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.025% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 2.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 1.9% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.4% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.80% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.40% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.18% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.050% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.025% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.025% fail on Other emission control equipment
      • 0.48% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.48% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.10% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.10% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 0.68% fail on Steering
    • 0.45% fail on Power steering (160% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Other components (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Operation (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.050% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.025% fail on Pump
    • 0.20% fail on Steering linkage components (74% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Track rod end (75% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.025% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.025% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.025% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.025% fail on Steering wheel
  • 0.55% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.28% fail on Seat belts (53% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Condition (63% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.025% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.025% fail on Attachment
      • 0.025% fail on Requirements
    • 0.28% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.43% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.43% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.075% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.075% fail on Condition