Citroen Dispatch MOT Results
Registered in 201662.2% pass rate
from 3,986 tests in 2021
(42% worse than other 2016 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Dispatch is unusually good or bad.
-
17% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(85% worse than other 2016 vans)
- 5.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
-
5.3% fail on
Headlamps
(180% worse than other 2016 vans)
- 5.3% fail on Headlamp (190% worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.050% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 5.1% fail on Stop lamp (140% worse than other 2016 vans)
-
3.9% fail on
Headlamp aim
(55% worse than other 2016 vans)
- 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim (48% worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.58% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (190% worse than other 2016 vans)
-
1.1% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.1% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.60% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.43% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.050% fail on All direction indicators
-
1.1% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.68% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.68% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.68% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.68% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.28% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.25% fail on Position lamp
- 0.025% fail on All position lamps
-
0.25% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.075% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.075% fail on Horn
- 0.050% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.050% fail on Battery(ies)
-
0.13% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.13% fail on Reversing lamps
- 0.10% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.075% fail on
Hazard warning
(3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.075% fail on Switch (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
-
9.1% fail on
Visibility
(71% worse than other 2016 vans)
- 4.6% fail on Wipers (79% worse than other 2016 vans)
- 4.1% fail on Washers (82% worse than other 2016 vans)
-
0.53% fail on
View to rear
- 0.50% fail on Mirrors
- 0.025% fail on Indirect vision devices
-
0.43% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.43% fail on Windscreen
- 0.050% fail on Bonnet
- 0.025% fail on Driver's view
-
8.6% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
-
5.0% fail on
Transmission
(4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
-
4.8% fail on
Drive shafts
(4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 4.8% fail on Joints (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.025% fail on Drive shaft
-
0.20% fail on
Prop shafts
(2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.20% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
-
4.8% fail on
Drive shafts
(4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 2.8% fail on Exhaust system (9 times worse than other 2016 vans)
-
0.65% fail on
Seats
(7 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.63% fail on Driver's seat (11 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.025% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.25% fail on
Body
- 0.25% fail on Other body component
-
0.15% fail on
Doors
-
0.10% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.075% fail on Door condition
- 0.025% fail on Catch
-
0.025% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.025% fail on Door condition
-
0.025% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.025% fail on Door condition
-
0.10% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
0.13% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.075% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.025% fail on Tank
- 0.025% fail on Pipe
-
0.10% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.075% fail on Bracket (8 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.025% fail on Engine mounting condition
-
0.075% fail on
Load security
- 0.075% fail on Loading door (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
-
0.050% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.025% fail on Spare wheel condition
- 0.025% fail on Carrier
-
0.025% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.025% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.025% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.025% fail on Boot lid condition
- 0.025% fail on Undertray
-
5.0% fail on
Transmission
(4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
-
6.7% fail on
Brakes
-
4.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(34% worse than other 2016 vans)
-
3.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(44% worse than other 2016 vans)
- 3.6% fail on Brake pads (44% worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.025% fail on Brake linings
-
0.85% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.85% fail on Brake discs
-
0.075% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.075% fail on Cable
-
3.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(44% worse than other 2016 vans)
-
1.6% fail on
Brake performance
(38% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.65% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(60% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.65% fail on Rbt (sp) (59% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.63% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.63% fail on
Rbt
- 0.45% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.18% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.63% fail on
Rbt
-
0.38% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.35% fail on
Rbt
- 0.28% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.050% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.025% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.025% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.025% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.35% fail on
Rbt
-
0.30% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.30% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.20% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.10% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.30% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.050% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.65% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(60% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.90% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(170% worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.90% fail on Pedal (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.025% fail on Hand lever
-
0.35% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.25% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.18% fail on Electronic stability control
-
0.20% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.20% fail on Lever
- 0.18% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.025% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.025% fail on Reservoirs
-
4.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(34% worse than other 2016 vans)
-
5.3% fail on
Tyres
- 3.3% fail on Tread depth (37% worse than other 2016 vans)
- 2.2% fail on Condition
-
3.5% fail on
Suspension
(22% better than other 2016 vans)
-
1.7% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.2% fail on Ball joint (86% worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.45% fail on Ball joint dust cover (190% worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.075% fail on Pins and bushes (85% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.75% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
-
0.55% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(52% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.28% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.18% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.050% fail on Linkage
- 0.025% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.025% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.025% fail on Ball joint
- 0.025% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.53% fail on
Springs
(66% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.53% fail on
Coil springs
(61% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.53% fail on Coil spring (61% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.53% fail on
Coil springs
(61% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.10% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.075% fail on Ball joint
- 0.025% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.075% fail on Shock absorbers (83% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.025% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.025% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
1.7% fail on
Suspension arms
-
2.0% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
1.9% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
1.4% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.80% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.40% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
- 0.18% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.050% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
-
0.025% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.025% fail on Other emission control equipment
-
0.48% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.48% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
1.4% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.10% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.10% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
1.9% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.68% fail on
Steering
-
0.45% fail on
Power steering
(160% worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.28% fail on Other components (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.23% fail on Operation (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.050% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.025% fail on Pump
-
0.20% fail on
Steering linkage components
(74% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.18% fail on Track rod end (75% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.025% fail on Ball joint
-
0.025% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.025% fail on Steering rack
- 0.025% fail on Steering wheel
-
0.45% fail on
Power steering
(160% worse than other 2016 vans)
-
0.55% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.28% fail on
Seat belts
(53% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.20% fail on Condition (63% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.025% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.025% fail on Attachment
- 0.025% fail on Requirements
- 0.28% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.28% fail on
Seat belts
(53% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.43% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.43% fail on Registration plates
-
0.075% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.075% fail on Condition