MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Citroen » Nemo » 2009

Citroen Nemo MOT Results

Registered in 2009
59.8% pass rate
from 2,933 tests in 2020
(12% better than other 2009 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Nemo is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Suspension (5.1% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 6.9% fail on Springs (57% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 6.8% fail on Coil springs (170% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 6.8% fail on Coil spring (170% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.10% fail on Mounting (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.068% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (46% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 5.7% fail on Anti-roll bars (3.9% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Linkage ball joints (5.7% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (38% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover (110% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.72% fail on Ball joint (24% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Linkage (28% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.068% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (87% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.034% fail on Anti-roll bar
    • 2.9% fail on Shock absorbers (150% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Suspension arms (48% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint (51% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes (41% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Ball joint dust cover (67% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Suspension arm (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.034% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.1% fail on Macpherson strut (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.58% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Pins and bushes (170% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Macpherson strut (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.89% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (21% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.34% fail on Wheel bearings (78% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.17% fail on Other suspension component (71% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Ball joint (70% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.034% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.034% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.034% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.034% fail on Suspension rod
  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (35% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (32% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Stop lamp (46% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim (32% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim (34% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (0.42% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamps (37% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp (36% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.068% fail on Headlamp levelling device (62% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Direction indicators (21% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Flashing type (21% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Individual direction indicators (11% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.38% fail on Side repeaters (53% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.10% fail on All direction indicators (7.9% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.92% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (56% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.92% fail on Rear fog lamp (56% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.92% fail on Rear fog lamp (56% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.89% fail on Electrical equipment (34% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.51% fail on Horn (49% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Battery(ies) (54% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.068% fail on Electrical wiring (35% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.034% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.10% fail on Reversing lamps (61% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Reversing lamps (60% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.068% fail on Position lamps (84% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.068% fail on Position lamp (84% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.034% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.034% fail on Switch
  • 8.8% fail on Visibility (4.3% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 4.5% fail on Washers (20% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Wipers (4.6% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.75% fail on View to rear (0.38% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.75% fail on Mirrors (1.9% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.31% fail on Condition of glass (33% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Windscreen (32% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.17% fail on Driver's view (38% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.14% fail on Bonnet (29% better than other 2009 vans)
  • 8.8% fail on Tyres (39% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 5.1% fail on Tread depth (27% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on Condition (63% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.27% fail on Size/type (36% worse than other 2009 vans)
  • 6.4% fail on Brakes (56% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Mechanical brake components (53% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Brake linings and pads (50% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Brake pads (51% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.034% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.72% fail on Brake discs and drums (54% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.72% fail on Brake discs (54% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (80% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.068% fail on Lever (45% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.034% fail on Cable
    • 1.9% fail on Brake performance (77% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance (55% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (54% better than other 2009 vans)
          • 0.85% fail on Service brake performance (56% better than other 2009 vans)
          • 0.44% fail on Service brake imbalance (29% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.48% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (91% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.48% fail on Rbt (sp) (91% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Parking brake performance (86% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.24% fail on Rbt (89% better than other 2009 vans)
          • 0.17% fail on Parking brake performance (91% better than other 2009 vans)
          • 0.068% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (62% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.068% fail on Plate brake tester (21% worse than other 2009 vans)
          • 0.034% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.034% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.27% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (73% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.27% fail on Rbt (sp) (72% better than other 2009 vans)
          • 0.24% fail on Service brake imbalance (53% better than other 2009 vans)
          • 0.068% fail on Service brake performance (88% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.034% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.6% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (160% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Pedal (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Hand lever (27% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.55% fail on Parking brake control (2.6% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.55% fail on Lever (2.5% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.55% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (51% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.55% fail on Anti-lock braking system (46% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.24% fail on Rigid brake pipes (93% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.14% fail on Hydraulic systems (9.6% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.068% fail on Reservoirs (100% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.034% fail on Servos
      • 0.034% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.10% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (50% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.068% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (61% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.034% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.068% fail on Air and vacuum systems (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.068% fail on Servos (8 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.068% fail on Flexible brake hoses (75% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.034% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.034% fail on Other components
  • 4.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (28% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 4.5% fail on Exhaust emissions (28% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.8% fail on Compression ignition (44% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 2.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (8.4% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.44% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (80% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.068% fail on Emissions not tested (84% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.034% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.034% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.034% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.034% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 1.8% fail on Spark ignition (41% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (12% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.38% fail on Catalyst emissions (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.17% fail on Emissions not tested (150% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.034% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.034% fail on NOx sensor
    • 0.38% fail on Fluid leaks (29% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Engine oil leaks (20% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.034% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.034% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 4.3% fail on Body, chassis, structure (48% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Transmission (54% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Drive shafts (49% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Joints (49% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.034% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.034% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.034% fail on Joints
    • 1.3% fail on Exhaust system (31% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.58% fail on Doors (9.8% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Front passenger's door (66% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.38% fail on Door condition (76% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Driver's door (5.6% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.14% fail on Door condition (27% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.068% fail on Other passenger's door (61% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.034% fail on Door condition
        • 0.034% fail on Catch
    • 0.34% fail on Integral vehicle structure (49% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (48% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.27% fail on Fuel system (45% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Tank (45% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (47% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.14% fail on Body (70% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Other body component (56% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.10% fail on Chassis (76% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Chassis condition (75% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.068% fail on Towbar (23% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.034% fail on Other towbar components
      • 0.034% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.068% fail on Engine mounting (53% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.068% fail on Engine mounting condition (44% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.068% fail on Seats (67% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.068% fail on Passenger's seat (14% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.034% fail on Bumpers
  • 1.9% fail on Steering (59% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Steering linkage components (70% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Track rod end (67% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.58% fail on Steering gear (29% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.48% fail on Steering rack (15% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Operation (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.34% fail on Power steering (14% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Pipes and hoses (9.5% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Operation (30% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Other components (15% better than other 2009 vans)
  • 1.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (41% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Seat belts (16% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.82% fail on Prescribed areas (11% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Condition (36% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.17% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (82% better than other 2009 vans)
  • 0.27% fail on Road Wheels (0.97% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.20% fail on Attachment (5.1% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.068% fail on Condition (13% worse than other 2009 vans)
  • 0.24% fail on Identification of the vehicle (66% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.24% fail on Registration plates (66% better than other 2009 vans)