MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Citroen » Nemo » 2009

Citroen Nemo MOT Results

Registered in 2009
56.2% pass rate
from 2,937 tests in 2021
(8.4% better than other 2009 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Nemo is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Suspension
    • 8.5% fail on Springs (73% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 8.5% fail on Coil springs (200% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 8.4% fail on Coil spring (200% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.14% fail on Mounting (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 5.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.1% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 2.1% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (45% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.72% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.58% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.20% fail on Linkage
      • 0.17% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (70% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Pins and bushes (88% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Suspension arms (43% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Ball joint (40% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes (46% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.51% fail on Ball joint dust cover (60% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.034% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.6% fail on Shock absorbers (130% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.4% fail on Macpherson strut (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.61% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Macpherson strut (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.41% fail on Wheel bearings (75% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.27% fail on Other suspension component (60% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.10% fail on Ball joint (73% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.068% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.17% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.10% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.034% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.034% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.068% fail on Axles
      • 0.034% fail on Axle
      • 0.034% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.034% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.034% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (32% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Stop lamp (45% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (32% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.068% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.034% fail on Dipswitch
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim (27% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim (29% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.1% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.1% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.7% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.17% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.17% fail on Side repeaters (80% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.99% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (60% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.99% fail on Rear fog lamp (60% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.99% fail on Rear fog lamp (60% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.95% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.51% fail on Battery(ies) (150% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Horn
      • 0.068% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.24% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.24% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.068% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.068% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.068% fail on Rear reflectors (83% better than other 2009 vans)
  • 10% fail on Visibility
    • 5.4% fail on Washers (24% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on Wipers
    • 0.75% fail on View to rear
      • 0.72% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.034% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.72% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.72% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.48% fail on Bonnet (150% worse than other 2009 vans)
  • 8.1% fail on Tyres (28% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 5.0% fail on Tread depth (29% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.6% fail on Condition (36% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.17% fail on Size/type
  • 6.3% fail on Brakes (59% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Mechanical brake components (51% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Brake linings and pads (52% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Brake pads (52% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.034% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.95% fail on Brake discs and drums (40% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.95% fail on Brake discs (40% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (80% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.068% fail on Lever
        • 0.034% fail on Cable
    • 1.8% fail on Brake performance (79% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance (57% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (57% better than other 2009 vans)
          • 0.78% fail on Service brake performance (63% better than other 2009 vans)
          • 0.48% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.034% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.034% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.54% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (90% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.54% fail on Rbt (sp) (90% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (80% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.24% fail on Rbt (sp) (79% better than other 2009 vans)
          • 0.17% fail on Service brake imbalance (71% better than other 2009 vans)
          • 0.10% fail on Service brake performance (85% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Parking brake performance (94% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.14% fail on Rbt (94% better than other 2009 vans)
          • 0.10% fail on Parking brake performance (95% better than other 2009 vans)
          • 0.034% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.068% fail on Brake performance not tested (79% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (130% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Pedal (150% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.72% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.72% fail on Lever
    • 0.31% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (78% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Anti-lock braking system (76% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.24% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.14% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.034% fail on Servos
      • 0.034% fail on Master cylinder
      • 0.034% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.17% fail on Rigid brake pipes (95% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.10% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.034% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.034% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.034% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.034% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.034% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
  • 5.7% fail on Body, chassis, structure (39% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Transmission (43% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Drive shafts (35% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 2.3% fail on Joints (35% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.034% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.034% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.034% fail on Joints
    • 1.3% fail on Exhaust system (39% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.61% fail on Doors
      • 0.34% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.34% fail on Door condition (160% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.24% fail on Door condition
      • 0.034% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.034% fail on Catch
    • 0.58% fail on Integral vehicle structure (46% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.58% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (45% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.54% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.31% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.24% fail on Tank
    • 0.17% fail on Seats
      • 0.14% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.034% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.10% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.068% fail on Chassis (90% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.068% fail on Chassis condition (90% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.068% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.034% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.034% fail on Bracket
    • 0.068% fail on Body (87% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.068% fail on Panel
    • 0.034% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.034% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.034% fail on Towbar
      • 0.034% fail on Towbar condition
    • 0.034% fail on Load security
      • 0.034% fail on Loading door
    • 0.034% fail on Floor
    • 0.034% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.034% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.034% fail on Cabs
      • 0.034% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 5.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (25% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 4.9% fail on Exhaust emissions (25% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 3.5% fail on Compression ignition (34% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 2.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.54% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (75% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.10% fail on Emissions not tested (81% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.034% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.034% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 1.5% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.99% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.34% fail on Catalyst emissions (140% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.27% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.27% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.17% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.034% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.034% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
      • 0.034% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.10% fail on Noise suppression (5 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.068% fail on Sound deadening material (8 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.034% fail on Undertray
  • 2.7% fail on Steering (48% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Steering linkage components (63% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Track rod end (64% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.034% fail on Lock stop
    • 0.75% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.58% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.17% fail on Operation (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.58% fail on Power steering
      • 0.24% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.20% fail on Other components
      • 0.068% fail on Rams
      • 0.034% fail on Operation
      • 0.034% fail on Pump
    • 0.034% fail on Steering play
      • 0.034% fail on Steering rack
  • 2.2% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.9% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.4% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.41% fail on Condition
      • 0.068% fail on Attachment
      • 0.068% fail on Requirements
    • 0.34% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (66% better than other 2009 vans)
  • 0.54% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.54% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.37% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.24% fail on Attachment
    • 0.14% fail on Condition