Citroen Nemo MOT Results
Registered in 200957.8% pass rate
from 2,132 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Nemo is unusually good or bad.
-
22% fail on
Suspension
(46% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
8.2% fail on
Coil springs
(2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 8.0% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.23% fail on Location (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
-
8.0% fail on
Shock absorbers
(4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 8.0% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
-
6.6% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(34% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 5.5% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (64% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.56% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (56% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.38% fail on Linkage condition
- 0.047% fail on Condition
- 0.047% fail on Presence
-
1.8% fail on
Macpherson strut
(4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 1.8% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
-
1.1% fail on
Drive shafts
(60% better than other 2009 vans)
-
1.1% fail on
Front drive shafts
(59% better than other 2009 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Constant velocity joints (59% better than other 2009 vans)
-
1.1% fail on
Front drive shafts
(59% better than other 2009 vans)
-
1.1% fail on
Suspension arms
(60% better than other 2009 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (59% better than other 2009 vans)
-
0.33% fail on
Wheel bearings
(74% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.19% fail on Front (80% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.14% fail on Rear
- 0.33% fail on Front suspension joints (73% better than other 2009 vans)
-
0.28% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.28% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.094% fail on
Bonded suspension
- 0.094% fail on Condition
-
0.047% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.047% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.047% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.047% fail on Component mounting
-
8.2% fail on
Coil springs
(2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
-
19% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(24% better than other 2009 vans)
- 7.7% fail on Registration plate lamp (25% better than other 2009 vans)
-
6.1% fail on
Position lamps
- 4.2% fail on Front lamps (25% better than other 2009 vans)
- 2.1% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.094% fail on All position lamps
- 0.094% fail on Switch (7 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 3.7% fail on Stop lamp (45% better than other 2009 vans)
- 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim (29% better than other 2009 vans)
-
3.1% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.1% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.3% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.56% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.33% fail on All direction indicators
-
3.1% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.7% fail on
Headlamps
(42% better than other 2009 vans)
- 1.7% fail on Headlamp (43% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.047% fail on Switch
-
0.94% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(52% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.94% fail on Fog lamp (52% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.094% fail on Tell tale
- 0.61% fail on Horn
- 0.52% fail on Battery
- 0.047% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.047% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.047% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.047% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
11% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(27% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 5.3% fail on Washers (64% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 4.4% fail on Wipers
- 1.3% fail on Windscreen
- 1.1% fail on Mirrors
- 0.047% fail on Bonnet
-
9.3% fail on
Tyres
(43% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 5.7% fail on Tread depth (47% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 4.2% fail on Condition (49% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.47% fail on Size/type (160% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
6.6% fail on
Brakes
(50% better than other 2009 vans)
-
2.7% fail on
Hub components
(34% better than other 2009 vans)
- 2.3% fail on Brake pads
- 0.61% fail on Brake discs
- 0.094% fail on Brake calipers
-
1.4% fail on
Service brake control components
(120% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
1.4% fail on
Pedal
(120% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Anti-slip (140% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.047% fail on Condition
-
1.4% fail on
Pedal
(120% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
1.3% fail on
Brake performance
(81% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.56% fail on Front wheels (52% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.42% fail on Parking brake performance (90% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.33% fail on Rear wheels (89% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.23% fail on Brake imbalance
-
0.80% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.80% fail on Condition
- 0.70% fail on ABS
-
0.42% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(88% better than other 2009 vans)
-
0.23% fail on
Components
(93% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.14% fail on Pipes (95% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.094% fail on Hoses
- 0.14% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.047% fail on Leaks
-
0.23% fail on
Components
(93% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.14% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.047% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.047% fail on Lever
-
2.7% fail on
Hub components
(34% better than other 2009 vans)
-
2.8% fail on
Steering
-
1.3% fail on
Steering system
(61% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.52% fail on Steering rack
- 0.52% fail on Track rod end (80% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.19% fail on Ball joint
- 0.094% fail on Drag link end
-
0.75% fail on
Power steering
- 0.66% fail on Operation (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.14% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.70% fail on Steering operation (7 times worse than other 2009 vans)
-
0.094% fail on
Steering control
- 0.094% fail on Steering lock (18 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.094% fail on Locking devices (5 times worse than other 2009 vans)
-
1.3% fail on
Steering system
(61% better than other 2009 vans)
-
1.6% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 1.2% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.28% fail on Emissions
-
0.28% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.14% fail on Cap
- 0.094% fail on Tank
- 0.047% fail on System
- 0.047% fail on Emissions not tested
-
1.3% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
0.61% fail on
Doors
- 0.28% fail on Passengers front
- 0.23% fail on Drivers
- 0.094% fail on Passengers other
- 0.23% fail on Body condition
-
0.094% fail on
Seats
- 0.094% fail on Passengers
-
0.094% fail on
Load security
- 0.094% fail on Access panel (15 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.094% fail on Spare wheel
- 0.047% fail on Engine mountings
-
0.047% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.047% fail on Chassis
- 0.047% fail on Body security
-
0.61% fail on
Doors
-
0.47% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.47% fail on Registration plate
-
0.38% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.19% fail on Condition
- 0.19% fail on Attachment
-
0.38% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(77% better than other 2009 vans)
-
0.23% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(69% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.23% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (66% better than other 2009 vans)
-
0.14% fail on
Seat belts
(84% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.14% fail on Condition (75% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.047% fail on Attachment
-
0.23% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(69% better than other 2009 vans)