MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Citroen » Nemo » 2009
Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Citroen Nemo MOT Results

Registered in 2009
57.8% pass rate
from 2,132 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Nemo is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Suspension (46% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 8.2% fail on Coil springs (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 8.0% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Location (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 8.0% fail on Shock absorbers (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 8.0% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 6.6% fail on Anti-roll bars (34% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 5.5% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (64% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.56% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (56% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.047% fail on Condition
      • 0.047% fail on Presence
    • 1.8% fail on Macpherson strut (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Drive shafts (60% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Front drive shafts (59% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Constant velocity joints (59% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Suspension arms (60% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (59% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.33% fail on Wheel bearings (74% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Front (80% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Rear
    • 0.33% fail on Front suspension joints (73% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.28% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.28% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.094% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.094% fail on Condition
    • 0.047% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.047% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.047% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.047% fail on Component mounting
  • 19% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (24% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 7.7% fail on Registration plate lamp (25% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 6.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.2% fail on Front lamps (25% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.094% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.094% fail on Switch (7 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Stop lamp (45% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim (29% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.1% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.3% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.56% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.33% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.7% fail on Headlamps (42% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Headlamp (43% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.047% fail on Switch
    • 0.94% fail on Rear fog lamp (52% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.94% fail on Fog lamp (52% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.094% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.61% fail on Horn
    • 0.52% fail on Battery
    • 0.047% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.047% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.047% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.047% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 11% fail on Driver's view of the road (27% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 5.3% fail on Washers (64% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Wipers
    • 1.3% fail on Windscreen
    • 1.1% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.047% fail on Bonnet
  • 9.3% fail on Tyres (43% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 5.7% fail on Tread depth (47% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Condition (49% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.47% fail on Size/type (160% worse than other 2009 vans)
  • 6.6% fail on Brakes (50% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Hub components (34% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.61% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.094% fail on Brake calipers
    • 1.4% fail on Service brake control components (120% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Pedal (120% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Anti-slip (140% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.047% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on Brake performance (81% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.56% fail on Front wheels (52% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.42% fail on Parking brake performance (90% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on Rear wheels (89% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 0.80% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.80% fail on Condition
    • 0.70% fail on ABS
    • 0.42% fail on Hydraulic systems (88% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Components (93% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.14% fail on Pipes (95% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.094% fail on Hoses
      • 0.14% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.047% fail on Leaks
    • 0.14% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.047% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.047% fail on Lever
  • 2.8% fail on Steering
    • 1.3% fail on Steering system (61% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.52% fail on Track rod end (80% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.094% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.75% fail on Power steering
      • 0.66% fail on Operation (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.70% fail on Steering operation (7 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.094% fail on Steering control
      • 0.094% fail on Steering lock (18 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.094% fail on Locking devices (5 times worse than other 2009 vans)
  • 1.6% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 1.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.28% fail on Emissions
    • 0.28% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.14% fail on Cap
      • 0.094% fail on Tank
      • 0.047% fail on System
    • 0.047% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 1.3% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.61% fail on Doors
      • 0.28% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.23% fail on Drivers
      • 0.094% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.23% fail on Body condition
    • 0.094% fail on Seats
      • 0.094% fail on Passengers
    • 0.094% fail on Load security
      • 0.094% fail on Access panel (15 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.094% fail on Spare wheel
    • 0.047% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.047% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.047% fail on Chassis
    • 0.047% fail on Body security
  • 0.47% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.47% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.38% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.19% fail on Condition
    • 0.19% fail on Attachment
  • 0.38% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (77% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.23% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (69% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (66% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.14% fail on Seat belts (84% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Condition (75% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.047% fail on Attachment