MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Citroen » Nemo » 2009
Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Citroen Nemo MOT Results

Registered in 2009
58.4% pass rate
from 3,278 tests in 2020
(11% better than other 2009 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Nemo is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Suspension
    • 6.4% fail on Springs (57% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 6.4% fail on Coil springs (160% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 6.3% fail on Coil spring (160% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.061% fail on Mounting
      • 0.031% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 6.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.2% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (81% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.92% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.64% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.15% fail on Linkage
      • 0.092% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (83% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.061% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.031% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 2.8% fail on Shock absorbers (160% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Suspension arms (49% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint (37% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.61% fail on Pins and bushes (67% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.37% fail on Ball joint dust cover (58% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Suspension arm
    • 1.3% fail on Macpherson strut (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.73% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Pins and bushes (160% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Macpherson strut (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.31% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (60% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.21% fail on Wheel bearings (85% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Other suspension component (70% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.061% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.031% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.031% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.031% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.031% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.092% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.061% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.031% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.031% fail on Axles
      • 0.031% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (33% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (38% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim (26% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim (27% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.0% fail on Stop lamp (55% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.031% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.0% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.18% fail on Side repeaters (78% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.7% fail on Position lamps (54% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Position lamp (54% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.061% fail on Switch
      • 0.031% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.95% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.55% fail on Horn
      • 0.27% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.12% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.88% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (58% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.88% fail on Rear fog lamp (58% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.88% fail on Rear fog lamp (58% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.031% fail on Switch
    • 0.21% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.21% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.061% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.061% fail on Switch
    • 0.031% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 9.6% fail on Tyres (55% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 5.9% fail on Tread depth (49% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Condition (80% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Size/type
  • 9.4% fail on Visibility
    • 5.7% fail on Washers (48% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Wipers (27% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on View to rear
      • 1.1% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.55% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.55% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.34% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.24% fail on Driver's view
  • 6.7% fail on Brakes (54% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Brake performance (73% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (80% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 1.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (80% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.92% fail on Service brake performance (61% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.85% fail on Rbt (63% better than other 2009 vans)
          • 0.58% fail on Service brake performance (68% better than other 2009 vans)
          • 0.37% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.061% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.031% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.031% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.24% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (75% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.24% fail on Rbt (sp) (74% better than other 2009 vans)
          • 0.18% fail on Service brake imbalance (62% better than other 2009 vans)
          • 0.061% fail on Service brake performance (89% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Parking brake performance (88% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.24% fail on Rbt (88% better than other 2009 vans)
          • 0.15% fail on Parking brake performance (91% better than other 2009 vans)
          • 0.092% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.061% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.7% fail on Mechanical brake components (63% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Brake linings and pads (60% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Brake pads (59% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.58% fail on Brake discs and drums (61% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.58% fail on Brake discs (61% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.061% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (87% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.061% fail on Lever
    • 1.6% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (150% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Pedal (140% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.49% fail on Hand lever (180% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.85% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.85% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.55% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.55% fail on Lever
    • 0.24% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.15% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.12% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.031% fail on Servos
    • 0.12% fail on Rigid brake pipes (96% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.031% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.031% fail on Servos
    • 0.031% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.031% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.031% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.031% fail on Other components
  • 5.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (27% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 5.0% fail on Exhaust emissions (26% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 3.3% fail on Compression ignition (40% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 2.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.73% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (72% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.061% fail on Emissions not tested (84% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.34% fail on Catalyst emissions (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.24% fail on Fluid leaks (60% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Engine oil leaks (65% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.061% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.031% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.031% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.031% fail on Sound deadening material
  • 4.4% fail on Body, chassis, structure (43% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Transmission (53% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Drive shafts (48% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Joints (47% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.061% fail on Prop shafts (87% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.061% fail on Joints
    • 1.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.67% fail on Doors
      • 0.37% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.34% fail on Door condition
        • 0.031% fail on Catch
      • 0.31% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.31% fail on Door condition (200% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.061% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.031% fail on Door condition
        • 0.031% fail on Hinge
    • 0.52% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.27% fail on Tank (160% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.15% fail on Seats
      • 0.092% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.061% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.092% fail on Integral vehicle structure (76% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.092% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (76% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.092% fail on Body (81% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.092% fail on Other body component (73% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.061% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.061% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.061% fail on Load security
      • 0.031% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.031% fail on Tailgate condition
      • 0.031% fail on Loading door
    • 0.031% fail on Chassis
      • 0.031% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.031% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.031% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.031% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 1.7% fail on Steering (64% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Steering linkage components (73% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.95% fail on Track rod end (73% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.031% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.031% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.031% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.37% fail on Power steering
      • 0.21% fail on Other components
      • 0.12% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.031% fail on Operation
    • 0.27% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.21% fail on Operation (5 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.061% fail on Steering rack (83% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.031% fail on Steering wheel
  • 1.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (40% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.92% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.46% fail on Condition
      • 0.37% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.061% fail on Attachment
      • 0.031% fail on Requirements
    • 0.46% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (52% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.031% fail on Airbags
      • 0.031% fail on Drivers airbag
      • 0.031% fail on Passengers airbag
  • 0.52% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.52% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.46% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.24% fail on Attachment
    • 0.21% fail on Condition (180% worse than other 2009 vans)