Citroen Nemo MOT Results

Registered in 2010
59.1% pass rate
from 2,036 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Nemo is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (15% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 9.3% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 5.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.2% fail on Front lamps (25% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.049% fail on All position lamps
    • 4.2% fail on Stop lamp (32% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim (26% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.1% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.83% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.20% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.049% fail on Tell tales
    • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.0% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.049% fail on Switch
    • 1.1% fail on Headlamps (63% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp (63% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.49% fail on Horn
    • 0.39% fail on Battery
    • 0.098% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.098% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.049% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 20% fail on Suspension (49% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 11% fail on Coil springs (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 10% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Location (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 6.1% fail on Shock absorbers (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 6.1% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Anti-roll bars (43% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.29% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (74% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.098% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.049% fail on Condition
    • 1.5% fail on Macpherson strut (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Drive shafts (53% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Front drive shafts (52% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Constant velocity joints (52% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Suspension arms (48% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (47% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.88% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.098% fail on Wheel bearings (91% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.098% fail on Rear
    • 0.049% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.049% fail on Condition
    • 0.049% fail on Axles
      • 0.049% fail on Swivel joints/housing
    • 0.049% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 9.6% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.7% fail on Wipers
    • 3.0% fail on Washers
    • 1.5% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.93% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.15% fail on Bonnet
  • 9.5% fail on Tyres (53% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.8% fail on Tread depth (58% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Condition (57% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.15% fail on Size/type
  • 6.8% fail on Brakes (42% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Hub components (55% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Brake pads (46% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Brake discs (73% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Service brake control components (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Pedal (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Anti-slip (200% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Brake performance (68% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.69% fail on Parking brake performance (80% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Rear wheels (74% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.29% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.049% fail on Service brake performance
    • 0.98% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.98% fail on Condition
    • 0.69% fail on ABS
    • 0.29% fail on Hydraulic systems (89% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Components (92% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.098% fail on Hoses
        • 0.098% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.098% fail on Leaks
    • 0.049% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.049% fail on Additional braking devices
    • 0.049% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.049% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
  • 2.5% fail on Steering (33% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Power steering (180% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.64% fail on Operation (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Pipes and hoses (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.098% fail on Other components
    • 1.1% fail on Steering system (67% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.74% fail on Track rod end (72% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.25% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.049% fail on Locking devices
  • 1.2% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 0.64% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.44% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.20% fail on Tank
      • 0.098% fail on Cap
      • 0.098% fail on System
      • 0.049% fail on Pipe
    • 0.15% fail on Emissions
    • 0.049% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 0.74% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.74% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.49% fail on Road Wheels (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.34% fail on Attachment
    • 0.15% fail on Condition
  • 0.49% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (57% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.25% fail on Doors
      • 0.098% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.098% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.049% fail on Drivers
    • 0.098% fail on Body condition (79% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.098% fail on Load security
      • 0.049% fail on Access panel
      • 0.049% fail on Loading door
    • 0.049% fail on Spare wheel
  • 0.39% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (69% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.25% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.25% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
    • 0.15% fail on Seat belts (79% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Condition