Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Citroen Nemo MOT Results

Registered in 2010
58.9% pass rate
from 3,184 tests in 2020
(8.7% better than other 2010 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Nemo is unusually good or bad.

  • 15% fail on Suspension
    • 7.7% fail on Springs (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 7.7% fail on Coil springs (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 7.7% fail on Coil spring (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Anti-roll bars (50% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage ball joints (39% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.91% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.31% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint (59% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.094% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (84% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.031% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.031% fail on Linkage
    • 2.4% fail on Suspension arms (46% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.28% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.25% fail on Pins and bushes (86% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.031% fail on Suspension arm
    • 1.9% fail on Shock absorbers (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Macpherson strut (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.60% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Macpherson strut (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.031% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.38% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.13% fail on Other suspension component (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.063% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.063% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.16% fail on Wheel bearings (88% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.13% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (30% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (22% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim (24% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.16% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.8% fail on Stop lamp (54% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.6% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.0% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.60% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.063% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.3% fail on Position lamps (34% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Position lamp (34% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.063% fail on All position lamps
    • 1.8% fail on Headlamps (47% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Headlamp (47% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.063% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (38% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (38% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (41% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.094% fail on Switch
    • 0.82% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.38% fail on Horn
      • 0.35% fail on Battery(ies) (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.38% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.38% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.031% fail on Outline marker lamps
      • 0.031% fail on Outline marker lamp
  • 9.5% fail on Visibility (19% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.5% fail on Wipers (25% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Washers
    • 0.85% fail on View to rear
      • 0.85% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.75% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.75% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.35% fail on Bonnet (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.25% fail on Driver's view
  • 9.4% fail on Tyres (56% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 6.1% fail on Tread depth (62% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Condition (56% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.47% fail on Size/type (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
  • 7.4% fail on Brakes (45% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Mechanical brake components (45% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Brake linings and pads (44% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 2.0% fail on Brake pads (43% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.0% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.0% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (200% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Pedal (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.53% fail on Hand lever (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Brake performance (70% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.88% fail on Service brake performance (54% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.85% fail on Rbt (55% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.60% fail on Service brake performance (59% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.31% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.031% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.031% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.69% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (84% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.69% fail on Rbt (sp) (84% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.41% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.35% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.063% fail on Service brake performance (86% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Parking brake performance (89% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.19% fail on Rbt (88% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.19% fail on Parking brake performance (87% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.063% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.97% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.97% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.60% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.60% fail on Lever
    • 0.19% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.094% fail on Rigid brake pipes (97% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.063% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.031% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.031% fail on Brake fluid
  • 4.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.9% fail on Compression ignition (35% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.91% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (58% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.25% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.031% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.031% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.031% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 1.7% fail on Spark ignition (61% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.38% fail on Catalyst emissions (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Emissions not tested (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.44% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.35% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.063% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.031% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.031% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 2.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure (57% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Transmission (56% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Drive shafts (53% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Joints (52% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.031% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.031% fail on Joints
    • 0.66% fail on Exhaust system (45% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.22% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.13% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.063% fail on Pipe
      • 0.031% fail on System
    • 0.19% fail on Doors
      • 0.19% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.19% fail on Door condition
    • 0.16% fail on Seats
      • 0.094% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.063% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.063% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.063% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.063% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.063% fail on Body (85% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.063% fail on Other body component (79% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.031% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.031% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.031% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.031% fail on Engine mounting condition
  • 2.5% fail on Steering (47% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Power steering (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.79% fail on Pipes and hoses (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Operation
      • 0.22% fail on Other components
      • 0.031% fail on Pump
    • 0.75% fail on Steering linkage components (81% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.69% fail on Track rod end (81% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.094% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.60% fail on Steering gear (90% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Operation (8 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.031% fail on Steering box
    • 0.031% fail on Steering column
  • 0.75% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (58% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.50% fail on Seat belts (53% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Condition
      • 0.094% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.031% fail on Attachment
    • 0.25% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (66% better than other 2010 vans)
  • 0.44% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.44% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.19% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.16% fail on Attachment
    • 0.031% fail on Condition
  • 0.031% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.031% fail on Anchorages