Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Citroen Nemo MOT Results

Registered in 2011
63.2% pass rate
from 1,152 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2011 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Nemo is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (28% better than other 2011 vans)
    • 8.4% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 4.2% fail on Position lamps (40% better than other 2011 vans)
      • 2.9% fail on Front lamps (48% better than other 2011 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Rear lamps
    • 3.4% fail on Stop lamp (40% better than other 2011 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim (38% better than other 2011 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamps (57% better than other 2011 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp (57% better than other 2011 vans)
      • 0.087% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.087% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 0.95% fail on Direction indicators (61% better than other 2011 vans)
      • 0.95% fail on Flashing type (61% better than other 2011 vans)
        • 0.35% fail on Individual lamps (78% better than other 2011 vans)
        • 0.35% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.17% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.087% fail on Tell tales
    • 0.87% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.87% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.43% fail on Horn
    • 0.087% fail on Battery
    • 0.087% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.087% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 16% fail on Suspension (33% worse than other 2011 vans)
    • 9.5% fail on Coil springs (3 times worse than other 2011 vans)
      • 9.3% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2011 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Location
    • 4.3% fail on Shock absorbers (2 times worse than other 2011 vans)
      • 4.3% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2011 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.2% fail on Anti-roll bars (68% better than other 2011 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (59% better than other 2011 vans)
      • 0.087% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.087% fail on Linkage condition
    • 1.0% fail on Macpherson strut (170% worse than other 2011 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Condition (170% worse than other 2011 vans)
    • 0.61% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.61% fail on Drive shafts (75% better than other 2011 vans)
      • 0.61% fail on Front drive shafts (75% better than other 2011 vans)
        • 0.52% fail on Constant velocity joints (78% better than other 2011 vans)
        • 0.087% fail on Couplings
    • 0.17% fail on Wheel bearings (82% better than other 2011 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Front
    • 0.087% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.087% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.087% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 8.9% fail on Tyres (50% worse than other 2011 vans)
    • 4.7% fail on Condition (77% worse than other 2011 vans)
    • 4.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.26% fail on Size/type
    • 0.087% fail on Valve stem
  • 7.7% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.9% fail on Wipers
    • 2.3% fail on Washers
    • 0.69% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.43% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.26% fail on Bonnet
  • 6.9% fail on Brakes (31% better than other 2011 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Brake performance (45% better than other 2011 vans)
      • 0.87% fail on Parking brake performance (67% better than other 2011 vans)
      • 0.78% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.78% fail on Rear wheels (57% better than other 2011 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.087% fail on Service brake performance
    • 2.2% fail on Hub components (48% better than other 2011 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Brake pads (50% better than other 2011 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.087% fail on Brake calipers
    • 1.6% fail on Service brake control components (150% worse than other 2011 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Pedal (150% worse than other 2011 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Anti-slip (150% worse than other 2011 vans)
        • 0.17% fail on Condition
    • 1.0% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.43% fail on ABS
    • 0.087% fail on Electronic stability system
  • 2.7% fail on Steering
    • 1.5% fail on Power steering (4 times worse than other 2011 vans)
      • 0.78% fail on Pipes and hoses (7 times worse than other 2011 vans)
      • 0.61% fail on Operation (3 times worse than other 2011 vans)
      • 0.087% fail on Electronic power steering
      • 0.087% fail on Pump
      • 0.087% fail on Other components
    • 0.87% fail on Steering system (68% better than other 2011 vans)
      • 0.43% fail on Track rod end (81% better than other 2011 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.087% fail on Free play
        • 0.087% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.087% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.35% fail on Steering operation (4 times worse than other 2011 vans)
  • 1.7% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 0.87% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.69% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.26% fail on System
      • 0.17% fail on Pipe
      • 0.17% fail on Cap
      • 0.087% fail on Tank
    • 0.26% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 0.78% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.78% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.61% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.52% fail on Doors
      • 0.26% fail on Drivers
      • 0.26% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.087% fail on Seats
      • 0.087% fail on Passengers
  • 0.35% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.17% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.17% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
    • 0.17% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.087% fail on Requirements
      • 0.087% fail on Condition