MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Citroen » Nemo » 2012

Citroen Nemo MOT Results

Registered in 2012
66.2% pass rate
from 1,519 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Nemo is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (31% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 7.3% fail on Registration plate lamp (29% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.1% fail on Position lamps (58% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Front lamps (64% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.92% fail on Rear lamps
    • 2.6% fail on Stop lamp (50% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.1% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.46% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.20% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.066% fail on Switch
    • 0.86% fail on Headlamps (68% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.79% fail on Headlamp (70% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.066% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.066% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 0.72% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.72% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.33% fail on Horn
    • 0.13% fail on Battery
    • 0.066% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.066% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 12% fail on Suspension (40% worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 7.5% fail on Coil springs (5 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 7.3% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Location (9 times worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 3.2% fail on Shock absorbers (2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 3.2% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Macpherson strut (200% worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Condition (200% worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.86% fail on Anti-roll bars (63% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.72% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (53% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (80% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.46% fail on Suspension arms (66% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.46% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (65% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.39% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.33% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.26% fail on Rear
      • 0.066% fail on Front
    • 0.26% fail on Drive shafts (86% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Front drive shafts (86% better than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.26% fail on Constant velocity joints (86% better than other 2012 vans)
  • 8.5% fail on Tyres (61% worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 5.0% fail on Tread depth (69% worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Condition (56% worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.33% fail on Size/type
  • 7.9% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.9% fail on Washers (58% worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Wipers
    • 0.66% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.59% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.13% fail on Bonnet
  • 5.9% fail on Brakes (32% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Service brake control components (200% worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Pedal (200% worse than other 2012 vans)
        • 1.8% fail on Anti-slip (2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Hub components (51% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Brake pads (58% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.066% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.066% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 1.6% fail on Brake performance (52% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.92% fail on Parking brake performance (55% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.46% fail on Rear wheels (66% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.20% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.20% fail on Service brake performance
    • 1.1% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.20% fail on Hydraulic systems (84% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Components (82% better than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Hoses
        • 0.066% fail on Pipes
    • 0.20% fail on ABS
  • 2.0% fail on Steering
    • 0.92% fail on Power steering (2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.66% fail on Operation (4 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on Pipes and hoses (3 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Other components (6 times worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.53% fail on Steering system (63% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Track rod end (75% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.066% fail on Free play
        • 0.066% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.066% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.53% fail on Steering operation (6 times worse than other 2012 vans)
  • 0.99% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 0.53% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.26% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.066% fail on Tank
      • 0.066% fail on Pipe
      • 0.066% fail on Cap
      • 0.066% fail on System
    • 0.13% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.066% fail on Emissions
  • 0.79% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.79% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.39% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.20% fail on Body condition
    • 0.066% fail on Body security
    • 0.066% fail on Doors
      • 0.066% fail on Drivers
    • 0.066% fail on Seats
      • 0.066% fail on Passengers
  • 0.33% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (66% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.26% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.26% fail on Condition
    • 0.066% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.066% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 0.20% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.13% fail on Condition
    • 0.13% fail on Attachment