Citroen Nemo MOT Results
Registered in 201266.2% pass rate
from 1,519 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Nemo is unusually good or bad.
-
16% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(31% better than other 2012 vans)
- 7.3% fail on Registration plate lamp (29% better than other 2012 vans)
- 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim
-
3.1% fail on
Position lamps
(58% better than other 2012 vans)
- 2.2% fail on Front lamps (64% better than other 2012 vans)
- 0.92% fail on Rear lamps
- 2.6% fail on Stop lamp (50% better than other 2012 vans)
-
1.8% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.8% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.1% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.46% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.20% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.066% fail on Switch
-
1.8% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.86% fail on
Headlamps
(68% better than other 2012 vans)
- 0.79% fail on Headlamp (70% better than other 2012 vans)
-
0.066% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.066% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
-
0.72% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.72% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.33% fail on Horn
- 0.13% fail on Battery
- 0.066% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.066% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
12% fail on
Suspension
(40% worse than other 2012 vans)
-
7.5% fail on
Coil springs
(5 times worse than other 2012 vans)
- 7.3% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2012 vans)
- 0.26% fail on Location (9 times worse than other 2012 vans)
-
3.2% fail on
Shock absorbers
(2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
- 3.2% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
-
1.1% fail on
Macpherson strut
(200% worse than other 2012 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Condition (200% worse than other 2012 vans)
-
0.86% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(63% better than other 2012 vans)
- 0.72% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (53% better than other 2012 vans)
- 0.13% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (80% better than other 2012 vans)
-
0.46% fail on
Suspension arms
(66% better than other 2012 vans)
- 0.46% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (65% better than other 2012 vans)
- 0.39% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.33% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.26% fail on Rear
- 0.066% fail on Front
-
0.26% fail on
Drive shafts
(86% better than other 2012 vans)
-
0.26% fail on
Front drive shafts
(86% better than other 2012 vans)
- 0.26% fail on Constant velocity joints (86% better than other 2012 vans)
-
0.26% fail on
Front drive shafts
(86% better than other 2012 vans)
-
7.5% fail on
Coil springs
(5 times worse than other 2012 vans)
-
8.5% fail on
Tyres
(61% worse than other 2012 vans)
- 5.0% fail on Tread depth (69% worse than other 2012 vans)
- 3.8% fail on Condition (56% worse than other 2012 vans)
- 0.33% fail on Size/type
-
7.9% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 3.9% fail on Washers (58% worse than other 2012 vans)
- 3.4% fail on Wipers
- 0.66% fail on Windscreen
- 0.59% fail on Mirrors
- 0.13% fail on Bonnet
-
5.9% fail on
Brakes
(32% better than other 2012 vans)
-
1.8% fail on
Service brake control components
(200% worse than other 2012 vans)
-
1.8% fail on
Pedal
(200% worse than other 2012 vans)
- 1.8% fail on Anti-slip (2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
-
1.8% fail on
Pedal
(200% worse than other 2012 vans)
-
1.8% fail on
Hub components
(51% better than other 2012 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Brake pads (58% better than other 2012 vans)
- 0.59% fail on Brake discs
- 0.066% fail on Brake linings
- 0.066% fail on Wheel cylinder
-
1.6% fail on
Brake performance
(52% better than other 2012 vans)
- 0.92% fail on Parking brake performance (55% better than other 2012 vans)
- 0.46% fail on Rear wheels (66% better than other 2012 vans)
- 0.33% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.20% fail on Front wheels
- 0.20% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.1% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.1% fail on Condition
-
0.20% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(84% better than other 2012 vans)
-
0.20% fail on
Components
(82% better than other 2012 vans)
- 0.13% fail on Hoses
- 0.066% fail on Pipes
-
0.20% fail on
Components
(82% better than other 2012 vans)
- 0.20% fail on ABS
-
1.8% fail on
Service brake control components
(200% worse than other 2012 vans)
-
2.0% fail on
Steering
-
0.92% fail on
Power steering
(2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
- 0.66% fail on Operation (4 times worse than other 2012 vans)
- 0.33% fail on Pipes and hoses (3 times worse than other 2012 vans)
- 0.26% fail on Other components (6 times worse than other 2012 vans)
-
0.53% fail on
Steering system
(63% better than other 2012 vans)
- 0.26% fail on Track rod end (75% better than other 2012 vans)
- 0.13% fail on Ball joint
-
0.066% fail on
Free play
- 0.066% fail on Steering rack
- 0.066% fail on Steering rack
- 0.53% fail on Steering operation (6 times worse than other 2012 vans)
-
0.92% fail on
Power steering
(2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
-
0.99% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 0.53% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.26% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.066% fail on Tank
- 0.066% fail on Pipe
- 0.066% fail on Cap
- 0.066% fail on System
- 0.13% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.066% fail on Emissions
-
0.79% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.79% fail on Registration plate
-
0.39% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 0.20% fail on Body condition
- 0.066% fail on Body security
-
0.066% fail on
Doors
- 0.066% fail on Drivers
-
0.066% fail on
Seats
- 0.066% fail on Passengers
-
0.33% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(66% better than other 2012 vans)
-
0.26% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.26% fail on Condition
-
0.066% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.066% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
0.26% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.20% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.13% fail on Condition
- 0.13% fail on Attachment