Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Citroen Nemo MOT Results

Registered in 2012
62.1% pass rate
from 2,041 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Nemo is unusually good or bad.

  • 12% fail on Suspension
    • 7.3% fail on Springs (170% worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 7.3% fail on Coil springs (2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
        • 7.3% fail on Coil spring (2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.049% fail on Mounting
    • 1.6% fail on Anti-roll bars (58% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Linkage ball joints (61% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.49% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.34% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.049% fail on Linkage
    • 1.5% fail on Shock absorbers (86% worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Macpherson strut (2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.15% fail on Macpherson strut (4 times worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Suspension arms (69% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Ball joint (67% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.15% fail on Pins and bushes (91% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.098% fail on Suspension arm
    • 0.54% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.20% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.15% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (14 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.049% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.44% fail on Wheel bearings (58% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.049% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.049% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (42% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.5% fail on Stop lamp (56% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (62% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.1% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.9% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.24% fail on Side repeaters (68% better than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.049% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.6% fail on Position lamps (59% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Position lamp (60% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.049% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.049% fail on Switch
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamps (63% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp (63% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.049% fail on Dipswitch
    • 0.64% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.29% fail on Battery(ies) (3 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Horn
      • 0.15% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.54% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (64% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Rear fog lamp (64% better than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.54% fail on Rear fog lamp (64% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.54% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.44% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.098% fail on Reversing lamp switch (5 times worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.049% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 8.9% fail on Tyres (66% worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 5.0% fail on Tread depth (48% worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 4.3% fail on Condition (99% worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.24% fail on Size/type
  • 6.8% fail on Brakes (39% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Mechanical brake components (44% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Brake linings and pads (51% better than other 2012 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Brake pads (52% better than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.049% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.88% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.88% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.2% fail on Brake performance (57% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt
          • 0.59% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.54% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (68% better than other 2012 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (67% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Parking brake performance (72% better than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.34% fail on Rbt (71% better than other 2012 vans)
          • 0.24% fail on Parking brake performance (76% better than other 2012 vans)
          • 0.098% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.20% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.20% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.098% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.098% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.049% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.7% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (190% worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Pedal (170% worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Hand lever (3 times worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Parking brake control (130% worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Lever (130% worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.20% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (72% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.15% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.098% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.098% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 6.6% fail on Visibility
    • 3.3% fail on Wipers
    • 2.8% fail on Washers
    • 0.39% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.39% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.34% fail on View to rear
      • 0.34% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.29% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.20% fail on Driver's view
  • 5.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (32% worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 4.9% fail on Exhaust emissions (37% worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 3.7% fail on Compression ignition (35% worse than other 2012 vans)
        • 1.8% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (88% worse than other 2012 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.59% fail on Emissions not tested (180% worse than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.049% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 1.2% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.93% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.29% fail on Catalyst emissions (9 times worse than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Non catalyst emissions (19 times worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.24% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.20% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.049% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 2.3% fail on Body, chassis, structure (56% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.88% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.54% fail on Transmission (83% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Drive shafts (81% better than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.54% fail on Joints (81% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.39% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.15% fail on Tank
      • 0.15% fail on System
      • 0.098% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.15% fail on Seats
      • 0.098% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.049% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.098% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.098% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.098% fail on Towbar
      • 0.098% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.098% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.098% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.098% fail on Doors
      • 0.098% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.098% fail on Door condition
    • 0.049% fail on Body
      • 0.049% fail on Other body component
  • 1.9% fail on Steering (39% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.73% fail on Steering linkage components (71% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.64% fail on Track rod end (73% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.098% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.73% fail on Power steering (200% worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Pipes and hoses (3 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Other components (2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.098% fail on Operation
    • 0.39% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.20% fail on Operation (7 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.49% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.49% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.44% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (68% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.29% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.15% fail on Seat belts (78% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.098% fail on Condition (83% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.049% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.24% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.24% fail on Attachment