MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Citroen » Nemo » 2015

Citroen Nemo MOT Results

Registered in 2015
65.2% pass rate
from 1,942 tests in 2021
(12% worse than other 2015 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2015 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Nemo is unusually good or bad.

  • 12% fail on Suspension (78% worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 8.9% fail on Springs (3 times worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 8.9% fail on Coil springs (3 times worse than other 2015 vans)
        • 8.8% fail on Coil spring (3 times worse than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Mounting (19 times worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Anti-roll bars (44% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.57% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.21% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.10% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.051% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 0.98% fail on Suspension arms (49% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.62% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.26% fail on Pins and bushes (67% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.62% fail on Macpherson strut (5 times worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Pins and bushes (9 times worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (5 times worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.46% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.36% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.051% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.051% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  • 10% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 3.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.15% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.62% fail on Direction indicators (62% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.62% fail on Flashing type (62% better than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.31% fail on Side repeaters (68% better than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.26% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.051% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.62% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.62% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.62% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.46% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.31% fail on Horn
      • 0.10% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.051% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.36% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.36% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.26% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.26% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.051% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 9.0% fail on Tyres (81% worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 5.0% fail on Tread depth (87% worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 5.0% fail on Condition (110% worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.15% fail on Size/type
  • 7.6% fail on Visibility (34% worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Wipers (64% worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Washers
    • 0.88% fail on Condition of glass (96% worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.88% fail on Windscreen (98% worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.31% fail on View to rear
      • 0.31% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.21% fail on Bonnet
  • 5.7% fail on Brakes (28% better than other 2015 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Mechanical brake components (37% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Brake linings and pads (46% better than other 2015 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Brake pads (48% better than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.051% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.77% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.77% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.051% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.051% fail on Lever
    • 2.0% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (3 times worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Pedal (3 times worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Hand lever
    • 1.6% fail on Brake performance (52% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.98% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.98% fail on Rbt
          • 0.72% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.36% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.36% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (83% better than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.36% fail on Rbt (sp) (83% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Parking brake performance (70% better than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Rbt (77% better than other 2015 vans)
          • 0.10% fail on Parking brake performance (82% better than other 2015 vans)
          • 0.051% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.051% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.051% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.10% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.051% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.051% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.051% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 0.46% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.46% fail on Lever
    • 0.051% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.051% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.051% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.051% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.051% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.051% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.051% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.051% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 2.0% fail on Steering
    • 1.4% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.3% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.10% fail on Drag link end (10 times worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.051% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.46% fail on Steering gear (3 times worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Operation (20 times worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.21% fail on Power steering
      • 0.10% fail on Operation
      • 0.10% fail on Other components
      • 0.051% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.10% fail on Steering play
      • 0.10% fail on Steering rack
  • 1.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (43% better than other 2015 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Exhaust emissions (46% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Compression ignition (42% better than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.36% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.36% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (71% better than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.31% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.051% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
      • 0.26% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.26% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.15% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.15% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 1.3% fail on Body, chassis, structure (58% better than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.36% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.36% fail on Transmission (78% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Drive shafts (76% better than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.31% fail on Joints (79% better than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.051% fail on Bearing housing
    • 0.31% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.15% fail on Tank
      • 0.10% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.051% fail on System
    • 0.10% fail on Body
      • 0.10% fail on Other body component
    • 0.10% fail on Doors
      • 0.10% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.10% fail on Door condition
    • 0.10% fail on Seats
      • 0.10% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 0.36% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (68% better than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.15% fail on Seat belts (77% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Condition (83% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.051% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.15% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.051% fail on Airbags
      • 0.051% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.26% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.26% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.10% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.10% fail on Attachment