Citroen Relay MOT Results

Registered in 2016
71.9% pass rate
from 7,333 tests in 2020
(32% worse than other 2016 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Relay is unusually good or bad.

  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (42% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 5.0% fail on Headlamp aim (48% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 4.6% fail on Headlamp aim (41% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.42% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 4.7% fail on Headlamps (200% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 4.6% fail on Headlamp (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.095% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.7% fail on Direction indicators (130% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Flashing type (130% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 2.3% fail on Side repeaters (160% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.35% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.014% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.014% fail on Switch
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.79% fail on Position lamps (29% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.79% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.61% fail on Electrical equipment (140% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Electrical wiring (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Horn
      • 0.11% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.014% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.57% fail on Stop lamp (67% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.48% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.48% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.48% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.45% fail on Outline marker lamps (120% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Outline marker lamp (120% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.068% fail on All outline marker lamps
    • 0.095% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.041% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.041% fail on Switch
    • 0.027% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.027% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.014% fail on Daytime running lamps
  • 11% fail on Brakes (120% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 6.9% fail on Brake performance (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 5.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 5.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.014% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance (6 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt (6 times worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.27% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (9 times worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.041% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.027% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.027% fail on Parking brake performance (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.014% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.014% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.0% fail on Service brake performance (110% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 1.0% fail on Rbt (110% worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.72% fail on Service brake performance (110% worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.30% fail on Service brake imbalance (96% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.014% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.014% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.26% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (95% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.25% fail on Rbt (sp) (95% worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.18% fail on Service brake imbalance (150% worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.14% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.014% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.014% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.11% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.8% fail on Mechanical brake components (23% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 3.4% fail on Brake linings and pads (21% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 3.3% fail on Brake pads (20% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.055% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.50% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.50% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.34% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.16% fail on Lever (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Cable (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.027% fail on Pivot (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.014% fail on Linkage
        • 0.014% fail on Relay lever
    • 1.8% fail on Parking brake control (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Lever (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.37% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.27% fail on Pedal
      • 0.095% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.26% fail on Flexible brake hoses (110% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.11% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.095% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.095% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (180% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.082% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.014% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.027% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.014% fail on Master cylinder
      • 0.014% fail on Reservoirs
  • 6.6% fail on Visibility (56% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Wipers (54% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Washers (28% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on View to rear (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Mirrors (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.014% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.68% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.68% fail on Windscreen
      • 0.014% fail on Window
    • 0.18% fail on Driver's view (130% worse than other 2016 vans)
  • 2.9% fail on Tyres (26% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Condition (21% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Tread depth (34% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.095% fail on Size/type
  • 2.4% fail on Body, chassis, structure (79% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Body (160% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.97% fail on Other body component (180% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.095% fail on Panel
      • 0.014% fail on Body condition
      • 0.014% fail on Pillar
    • 0.68% fail on Transmission (84% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.61% fail on Drive shafts (79% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.61% fail on Joints (82% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.068% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.068% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Doors
      • 0.068% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.055% fail on Door condition
        • 0.014% fail on Catch
      • 0.055% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.027% fail on Catch (6 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.014% fail on Door condition
        • 0.014% fail on Hinge
      • 0.055% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.041% fail on Door condition
        • 0.014% fail on Catch
    • 0.16% fail on Seats (150% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Driver's seat (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.014% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.12% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.11% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.041% fail on System
      • 0.027% fail on Hose (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.027% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.014% fail on Tank
    • 0.082% fail on Load security (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.082% fail on Loading door (6 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.041% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.027% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.014% fail on Bracket
    • 0.027% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.027% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.027% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.027% fail on Floor (8 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.014% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.014% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
  • 2.1% fail on Suspension
    • 1.0% fail on Suspension arms (130% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.80% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.095% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.42% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.30% fail on Other suspension component (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.014% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.16% fail on Springs (64% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.082% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.055% fail on Leaf spring
        • 0.027% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
      • 0.068% fail on Coil springs (81% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.068% fail on Coil spring (81% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.014% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.12% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.095% fail on Anti-roll bars (82% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.041% fail on Linkage ball joints (77% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.027% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (79% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.014% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.014% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.014% fail on Axles
      • 0.014% fail on Axle
    • 0.014% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.014% fail on Operation
  • 1.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (34% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.97% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.74% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.14% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.095% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.027% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.014% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.014% fail on Catalytic converter
      • 0.30% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.29% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.014% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.26% fail on Fluid leaks (200% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Engine oil leaks (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
  • 0.83% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.45% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.41% fail on Condition
      • 0.055% fail on Attachment
    • 0.40% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (120% worse than other 2016 vans)
  • 0.70% fail on Steering (100% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.35% fail on Power steering (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Other components (6 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Pipes and hoses (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.25% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.19% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.041% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.014% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.068% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.055% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.014% fail on Operation
    • 0.027% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.014% fail on Steering column
  • 0.30% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.30% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.18% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.14% fail on Condition (150% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.041% fail on Attachment
  • 0.014% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests
    • 0.014% fail on Steps and stairs
      • 0.014% fail on Retractable steps