MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Daihatsu » Hijet » 1996

Daihatsu Hijet MOT Results

Registered in 1996
54.0% pass rate
from 63 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 vans and highlighted areas where the Daihatsu Hijet is unusually good or bad.

  • 33% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 17% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (3 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 17% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 17% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 7.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 7.9% fail on Headlamp
    • 7.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 7.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 7.9% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 4.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.8% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 4.8% fail on Horn
    • 1.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.6% fail on Hazard warning
      • 1.6% fail on Switch
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.6% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 21% fail on Brakes
    • 16% fail on Brake performance
      • 14% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (130% worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 14% fail on Rbt (sp) (140% worse than other 1996 vans)
          • 11% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
          • 4.8% fail on Service brake performance
      • 6.3% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.8% fail on Rbt
          • 3.2% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 1.6% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
    • 3.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.6% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.6% fail on Lever
    • 1.6% fail on Load sensing valves
  • 21% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (3 times worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 21% fail on Exhaust emissions (4 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 21% fail on Spark ignition (9 times worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 9.5% fail on Emissions not tested (20 times worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 6.3% fail on Catalyst emissions (3 times worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 4.8% fail on Non catalyst emissions (41 times worse than other 1996 vans)
  • 16% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 9.5% fail on Exhaust system
    • 4.8% fail on Doors (4 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 4.8% fail on Other passenger's door (46 times worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 4.8% fail on Door condition (46 times worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.6% fail on Towbar
      • 1.6% fail on Coupling
    • 1.6% fail on Cabs
      • 1.6% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 14% fail on Visibility
    • 7.9% fail on Wipers
    • 6.3% fail on Washers
  • 11% fail on Suspension
    • 4.8% fail on Springs
      • 3.2% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
      • 1.6% fail on Coil springs
        • 1.6% fail on Coil spring
    • 4.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.6% fail on Wheel bearings
  • 3.2% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.2% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 3.2% fail on Tyres
    • 3.2% fail on Condition
    • 1.6% fail on Size/type
  • 1.6% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plates
  • 1.6% fail on Steering
    • 1.6% fail on Steering coupling
      • 1.6% fail on Flexible coupling