Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Daihatsu Hijet MOT Results

Registered in 2002
55.4% pass rate
from 204 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the Daihatsu Hijet is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 9.3% fail on Headlamp aim (85% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 8.8% fail on Headlamp aim (86% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.49% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 9.3% fail on Direction indicators (150% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 9.3% fail on Flashing type (150% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 8.3% fail on Individual direction indicators (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.98% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.98% fail on Side repeaters
    • 7.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 7.8% fail on Headlamp (97% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.49% fail on Dipswitch
    • 6.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 6.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 6.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 4.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.9% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 3.4% fail on Horn
      • 0.49% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 3.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.98% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.98% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.49% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 23% fail on Brakes
    • 18% fail on Brake performance
      • 15% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (180% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 15% fail on Rbt (sp) (180% worse than other 2002 vans)
          • 9.3% fail on Service brake performance (190% worse than other 2002 vans)
          • 7.4% fail on Service brake imbalance (150% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 10% fail on Service brake performance (100% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 10% fail on Rbt (110% worse than other 2002 vans)
          • 8.8% fail on Service brake performance (130% worse than other 2002 vans)
          • 2.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.0% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.0% fail on Rbt
          • 2.0% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (75% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (75% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.49% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.5% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 1.5% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.49% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.49% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.49% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.49% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.49% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.49% fail on Cable
    • 0.49% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.49% fail on Pedal
    • 0.49% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.49% fail on Servos
    • 0.49% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.49% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.49% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
  • 13% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (140% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 13% fail on Exhaust emissions (190% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 13% fail on Spark ignition (14 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 7.4% fail on Catalyst emissions (17 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 5.9% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (15 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Emissions not tested (9 times worse than other 2002 vans)
  • 13% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 7.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.4% fail on Fuel system (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.98% fail on Tank
      • 0.49% fail on Hose
      • 0.49% fail on Pipe
    • 0.98% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.98% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.98% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.98% fail on Doors
      • 0.98% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.49% fail on Door condition
        • 0.49% fail on Hinge
    • 0.49% fail on Chassis
      • 0.49% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.49% fail on Transmission
      • 0.49% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.49% fail on Joints
  • 11% fail on Visibility
    • 6.4% fail on Wipers
    • 4.4% fail on Washers
    • 1.5% fail on View to rear
      • 0.98% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.49% fail on Indirect vision devices
  • 9.3% fail on Suspension (56% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Springs
      • 1.5% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.98% fail on Leaf spring
        • 0.49% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
      • 1.5% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.98% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.98% fail on Coil spring
    • 2.9% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.5% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.98% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.49% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.49% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.49% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.49% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 3.9% fail on Steering
    • 2.5% fail on Prescribed areas (25 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.98% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.49% fail on Drag link end
  • 2.9% fail on Tyres
    • 2.0% fail on Condition
    • 2.0% fail on Tread depth
  • 1.5% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.49% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.49% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.49% fail on Prescribed areas