FIAT Doblo MOT Results
Registered in 200347.1% pass rate
from 951 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Doblo is unusually good or bad.
-
24% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
11% fail on
Headlamps
(140% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 10% fail on Headlamp (170% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.42% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 5.5% fail on Stop lamp
-
5.0% fail on
Direction indicators
-
5.0% fail on
Flashing type
- 4.1% fail on Individual direction indicators (66% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.74% fail on All direction indicators (190% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.42% fail on Side repeaters
-
5.0% fail on
Flashing type
-
4.4% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.63% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 3.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.8% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(49% better than other 2003 vans)
-
1.8% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(49% better than other 2003 vans)
- 1.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (48% better than other 2003 vans)
-
1.8% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(49% better than other 2003 vans)
-
1.3% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.95% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.32% fail on Horn (77% better than other 2003 vans)
-
0.32% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.21% fail on Switch
- 0.11% fail on Position lamp
- 0.32% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.11% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.11% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
11% fail on
Headlamps
(140% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
23% fail on
Suspension
- 9.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (33% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
6.5% fail on
Suspension arms
- 4.2% fail on Ball joint
- 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes
- 1.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.42% fail on Suspension arm
-
3.9% fail on
Springs
-
2.3% fail on
Coil springs
- 1.9% fail on Coil spring
- 0.42% fail on Mounting (9 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
0.42% fail on
Leaf springs
- 0.21% fail on Leaf spring
- 0.11% fail on Anchor bracket
- 0.11% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
-
2.3% fail on
Coil springs
-
2.9% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(43% better than other 2003 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.84% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.42% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.32% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.11% fail on Linkage
- 0.11% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 1.9% fail on Wheel bearings
- 1.4% fail on Shock absorbers
-
1.2% fail on
Macpherson strut
(3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.84% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (5 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.21% fail on Macpherson strut (5 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.11% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.42% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.32% fail on Ball joint
- 0.11% fail on Other suspension component
-
0.32% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.21% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.11% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
0.11% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.11% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
18% fail on
Brakes
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
-
8.1% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(53% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
8.1% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(54% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 4.6% fail on Service brake imbalance (67% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 4.0% fail on Service brake performance
-
8.1% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(54% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
5.9% fail on
Service brake performance
-
5.5% fail on
Rbt
- 4.0% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.7% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.11% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.21% fail on
Decelerometer
(5 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.11% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.11% fail on Service brake performance (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.21% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.21% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
5.5% fail on
Rbt
-
3.0% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(50% better than other 2003 vans)
- 3.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (49% better than other 2003 vans)
-
1.5% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt
- 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.11% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.11% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.11% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt
- 0.84% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
8.1% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(53% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
3.4% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.2% fail on Brake pads
-
1.2% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.1% fail on Brake discs
- 0.11% fail on Brake drums
-
1.2% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.84% fail on Cable
- 0.42% fail on Lever (4 times worse than other 2003 vans)
-
1.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 3.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes (37% better than other 2003 vans)
-
1.2% fail on
Parking brake control
- 1.2% fail on Lever
- 1.2% fail on Load sensing valves
-
0.95% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.74% fail on Hand lever (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.21% fail on Pedal
-
0.42% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.42% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.11% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.11% fail on Reservoirs
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
-
14% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 7.8% fail on Exhaust system (140% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
2.9% fail on
Transmission
(41% better than other 2003 vans)
-
2.8% fail on
Drive shafts
- 2.8% fail on Joints
-
0.11% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.11% fail on Joints
-
2.8% fail on
Drive shafts
-
1.9% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 1.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
1.7% fail on
Chassis
- 1.7% fail on Chassis condition
-
1.5% fail on
Doors
-
1.3% fail on
Other passenger's door
(2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Door condition (170% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.21% fail on Catch (14 times worse than other 2003 vans)
-
0.21% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.11% fail on Door condition
- 0.11% fail on Catch
-
1.3% fail on
Other passenger's door
(2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
-
0.53% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.53% fail on Engine mounting condition
-
0.32% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.11% fail on Tank
- 0.11% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.11% fail on System
-
0.32% fail on
Load security
-
0.21% fail on
Tailgate
(10 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.21% fail on Tailgate condition (16 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.11% fail on Loading door
-
0.21% fail on
Tailgate
(10 times worse than other 2003 vans)
-
0.21% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.11% fail on Spare wheel condition
- 0.11% fail on Carrier
- 0.11% fail on Bumpers
-
0.11% fail on
Towbar
- 0.11% fail on Towbar condition
-
0.11% fail on
Seats
- 0.11% fail on Passenger's seat
-
12% fail on
Visibility
- 6.5% fail on Wipers
- 5.7% fail on Washers
- 0.21% fail on Bonnet
-
0.21% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.21% fail on Windscreen
-
0.21% fail on
View to rear
- 0.21% fail on Mirrors
- 0.11% fail on Driver's view
-
9.1% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(100% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
8.0% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(120% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
7.2% fail on
Compression ignition
(140% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 4.1% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (140% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.84% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.63% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.21% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
-
0.11% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.11% fail on Oxygen sensor
- 0.11% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
-
0.84% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.42% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.21% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.21% fail on Emissions not tested
-
7.2% fail on
Compression ignition
(140% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
1.3% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.84% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.21% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
- 0.21% fail on Other leaks
-
8.0% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(120% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
8.2% fail on
Tyres
(37% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 5.2% fail on Tread depth (48% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 3.3% fail on Condition
- 0.63% fail on Size/type
-
2.8% fail on
Steering
(60% better than other 2003 vans)
-
1.9% fail on
Steering linkage components
(61% better than other 2003 vans)
- 1.7% fail on Track rod end (61% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.21% fail on Ball joint
-
0.74% fail on
Power steering
- 0.42% fail on Operation
- 0.42% fail on Other components
- 0.11% fail on Pipes and hoses
-
0.21% fail on
Steering gear
(86% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.21% fail on Operation
-
1.9% fail on
Steering linkage components
(61% better than other 2003 vans)
-
2.7% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(46% better than other 2003 vans)
-
2.4% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.6% fail on Condition
- 0.74% fail on Prescribed areas (69% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.21% fail on Attachment
- 0.32% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (82% better than other 2003 vans)
-
2.4% fail on
Seat belts
-
1.3% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.3% fail on Registration plates
-
0.32% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.21% fail on Condition
- 0.11% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review
-
Fiat Doblo (2001 - 2009)
Utilitarian looking. Bigger than Berlingo. Available with seven seats. Best with 1.3 Multijet diesel. Handles decently.