MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » FIAT » Doblo » 2005
Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

FIAT Doblo MOT Results

Registered in 2005
52.3% pass rate
from 2,846 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Doblo is unusually good or bad.

  • 30% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 11% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 10.0% fail on Headlamp aim (58% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 7.1% fail on Position lamps (16% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 5.8% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.3% fail on Rear lamps (54% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.035% fail on Switch
    • 7.0% fail on Headlamps (87% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 6.9% fail on Headlamp (87% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Switch
      • 0.070% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.035% fail on Headlamp levelling device
        • 0.035% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 4.9% fail on Stop lamp (31% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.5% fail on Individual lamps (34% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.53% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.35% fail on Side repeaters (63% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (62% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Fog lamp (62% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.035% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.035% fail on Switch
    • 0.98% fail on Battery
    • 0.28% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.18% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.14% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.14% fail on Horn (92% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.070% fail on Hazard warning (89% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.035% fail on Lamp
      • 0.035% fail on Switch
    • 0.035% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 15% fail on Suspension (37% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 5.6% fail on Suspension arms (24% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 5.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (26% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.070% fail on Attachment
      • 0.035% fail on Condition
    • 2.7% fail on Shock absorbers (42% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Condition (42% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Anti-roll bars (67% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (38% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.88% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (79% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Attachment
      • 0.035% fail on Condition
    • 2.0% fail on Drive shafts (49% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Front drive shafts (49% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.9% fail on Constant velocity joints (48% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.070% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.070% fail on Drive shafts
    • 1.9% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.6% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.2% fail on Rear (150% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.46% fail on Front (75% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.74% fail on Leaf springs
      • 0.39% fail on Pins and bushes
        • 0.39% fail on Shackle
      • 0.21% fail on Shackle bracket (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.070% fail on Spring eye
      • 0.070% fail on Securing bolts
      • 0.035% fail on Condition
    • 0.63% fail on Prescribed areas (87% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Component mounting (88% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Spring mounting (90% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.070% fail on Subframe mounting (87% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.35% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.35% fail on Condition
    • 0.035% fail on General condition
    • 0.035% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.035% fail on Condition
    • 0.035% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.035% fail on Condition
    • 0.035% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.035% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 14% fail on Brakes (26% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 9.7% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.3% fail on Rear wheels
      • 4.0% fail on Front wheels (39% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.9% fail on Service brake performance (120% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Parking brake performance (59% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.63% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.28% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.035% fail on Brake operation
    • 3.3% fail on Hydraulic systems (56% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.0% fail on Components (58% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Pipes (70% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.53% fail on Valves
        • 0.42% fail on Hoses (51% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.35% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.070% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.035% fail on Servos
      • 0.28% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.18% fail on Leaks
      • 0.11% fail on Operation
    • 2.5% fail on Hub components
      • 1.4% fail on Brake pads (40% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.070% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 1.6% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.53% fail on ABS (65% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.28% fail on Service brake control components (57% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Pedal (57% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.21% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.070% fail on Condition
    • 0.14% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.035% fail on Additional braking devices
    • 0.035% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.035% fail on Cable
    • 0.035% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.035% fail on Components
        • 0.035% fail on Servos
    • 0.035% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.035% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
  • 11% fail on Tyres (40% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 7.2% fail on Tread depth (48% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.5% fail on Condition (33% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.67% fail on Size/type (100% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.14% fail on Valve stem
  • 11% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.9% fail on Wipers
    • 3.9% fail on Washers
    • 0.84% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.42% fail on Mirrors (60% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.14% fail on Bonnet
  • 11% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (88% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 7.4% fail on Exhaust system (100% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Emissions (170% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.42% fail on Cap
      • 0.39% fail on System
      • 0.14% fail on Tank
      • 0.070% fail on Pipe
    • 0.95% fail on Emissions not tested (94% worse than other 2005 vans)
  • 3.7% fail on Steering (42% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Steering system (45% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Track rod end (30% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Steering rack (79% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint (76% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.070% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.035% fail on Free play
        • 0.035% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.74% fail on Power steering
      • 0.46% fail on Operation
      • 0.25% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.11% fail on Other components
      • 0.035% fail on Drive system
      • 0.035% fail on Rams
  • 2.6% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (46% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 1.1% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.28% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 1.3% fail on Seat belts (59% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.60% fail on Condition
      • 0.53% fail on Prescribed areas (76% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Requirements
      • 0.035% fail on Attachment
  • 2.4% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (55% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Doors
      • 0.84% fail on Passengers other (160% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.070% fail on Drivers
    • 0.46% fail on Engine mountings (150% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.32% fail on Spare wheel (170% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.21% fail on Body condition (92% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.21% fail on Seats
      • 0.21% fail on Passengers
      • 0.035% fail on Drivers
    • 0.18% fail on Load security
      • 0.070% fail on Bootlid (11 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.035% fail on Access panel
      • 0.035% fail on Tailgate
      • 0.035% fail on Loading door
    • 0.070% fail on Vehicle structure (94% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.070% fail on Chassis (94% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.035% fail on Body security
  • 0.77% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.74% fail on Registration plate
    • 0.035% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.35% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.21% fail on Attachment
    • 0.14% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

  • Fiat Doblo (2001 - 2009)
    Utilitarian looking. Bigger than Berlingo. Available with seven seats. Best with 1.3 Multijet diesel. Handles decently.