MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » FIAT » Doblo » 2009

FIAT Doblo MOT Results

Registered in 2009
62.4% pass rate
from 1,987 tests in 2021
(21% better than other 2009 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Doblo is unusually good or bad.

  • 11% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (44% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.25% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.9% fail on Stop lamp (53% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.050% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (58% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Direction indicators (62% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Flashing type (62% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.91% fail on Individual direction indicators (49% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.10% fail on Side repeaters (88% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.70% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.60% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (76% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.60% fail on Rear fog lamp (76% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.60% fail on Rear fog lamp (75% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.20% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.15% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.050% fail on Switch
    • 0.20% fail on Electrical equipment (80% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.050% fail on Horn
    • 0.050% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.050% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.050% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.050% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 9.3% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 5.8% fail on Exhaust system (180% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Transmission (67% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Drive shafts (62% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Joints (61% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Fuel system (100% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.60% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (150% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Tank (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.050% fail on Pipe
      • 0.050% fail on System
    • 0.50% fail on Doors
      • 0.45% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.45% fail on Door condition (150% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.050% fail on Hinge
      • 0.050% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.050% fail on Door condition
      • 0.050% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.050% fail on Door condition
    • 0.25% fail on Spare wheel (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Carrier (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.25% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.25% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.10% fail on Integral vehicle structure (91% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (90% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.10% fail on Boot lid (5 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Boot lid condition (7 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.10% fail on Passenger compartment (34 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.10% fail on Undertray
    • 0.050% fail on Body
      • 0.050% fail on Other body component
    • 0.050% fail on Seats
      • 0.050% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.050% fail on Cabs
      • 0.050% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 9.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (32% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 8.8% fail on Exhaust emissions (34% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 5.3% fail on Compression ignition
        • 2.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 1.9% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.96% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.40% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.20% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 3.7% fail on Spark ignition (160% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Catalyst emissions (10 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 1.0% fail on Emissions not tested (10 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.20% fail on Non catalyst emissions (9 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.50% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.25% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.20% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.050% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 8.1% fail on Visibility
    • 5.5% fail on Wipers (35% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.9% fail on Washers (33% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.20% fail on View to rear (71% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Mirrors (71% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.10% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.10% fail on Windscreen
  • 7.6% fail on Tyres
    • 4.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 4.0% fail on Condition (53% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.20% fail on Size/type
  • 6.6% fail on Brakes (56% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Brake performance (60% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.3% fail on Rbt
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.81% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.81% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (86% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.81% fail on Rbt (sp) (86% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.65% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.65% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.45% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.25% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.20% fail on Parking brake performance (91% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Rbt (93% better than other 2009 vans)
          • 0.10% fail on Parking brake performance (95% better than other 2009 vans)
          • 0.050% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.050% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.050% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
    • 2.6% fail on Mechanical brake components (40% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.7% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.96% fail on Brake linings and pads (65% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.96% fail on Brake pads (65% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.15% fail on Cable
    • 0.45% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (67% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.45% fail on Anti-lock braking system (64% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.40% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.30% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.10% fail on Pedal (80% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.40% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.40% fail on Lever
    • 0.20% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.15% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.050% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.20% fail on Rigid brake pipes (94% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.10% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.10% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.050% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.050% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.050% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.050% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.050% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.050% fail on Other braking system component
  • 6.6% fail on Suspension (63% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Suspension arms (51% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Ball joint (46% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes (46% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Ball joint dust cover (73% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.050% fail on Suspension arm
    • 1.2% fail on Macpherson strut (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.65% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Pins and bushes (180% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Macpherson strut (5 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Anti-roll bars (81% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.50% fail on Pins and bushes (55% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Linkage ball joints (87% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.10% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (82% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.050% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.050% fail on Linkage
      • 0.050% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.050% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.050% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.50% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (72% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.40% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.25% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.050% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.050% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.050% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.35% fail on Springs (93% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Coil springs (93% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.20% fail on Coil spring (93% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Leaf springs (95% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.050% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
        • 0.050% fail on Shackle bracket
      • 0.050% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.30% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.15% fail on Wheel bearings (91% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.050% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.050% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 2.1% fail on Steering (59% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Steering linkage components (57% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Track rod end (55% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.050% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.25% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.25% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.10% fail on Power steering
      • 0.050% fail on Operation
      • 0.050% fail on Other components
  • 0.86% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (71% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.81% fail on Seat belts (59% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.60% fail on Condition
      • 0.20% fail on Requirements
      • 0.050% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.050% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.35% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.35% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.15% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.10% fail on Attachment
    • 0.050% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

  • Fiat Doblo (2001 - 2009)
    Utilitarian looking. Bigger than Berlingo. Available with seven seats. Best with 1.3 Multijet diesel. Handles decently.