MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » FIAT » Doblo » 2009
Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

FIAT Doblo MOT Results

Registered in 2009
66.8% pass rate
from 2,080 tests in 2017
(20% better than other 2009 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Doblo is unusually good or bad.

  • 15% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (40% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 5.1% fail on Registration plate lamp (50% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 5.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.3% fail on Stop lamp (51% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.048% fail on Dipswitch
    • 2.2% fail on Position lamps (69% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Front lamps (74% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.67% fail on Rear lamps (66% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on All position lamps
    • 1.6% fail on Direction indicators (38% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Flashing type (38% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.34% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.096% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.72% fail on Rear reflectors (130% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.63% fail on Battery (110% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.34% fail on Rear fog lamp (83% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Fog lamp (85% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.048% fail on Switch
    • 0.19% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.14% fail on Horn (82% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.048% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.048% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.048% fail on Switch
    • 0.048% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 8.8% fail on Suspension (42% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Shock absorbers (180% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 3.8% fail on Condition (180% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.1% fail on Anti-roll bars (78% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.43% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (66% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (89% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Attachment
    • 1.1% fail on Macpherson strut (200% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Condition (200% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.96% fail on Drive shafts (66% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.96% fail on Front drive shafts (65% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.91% fail on Constant velocity joints (66% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.048% fail on Drive shafts
    • 0.58% fail on Leaf springs (51% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Pins and bushes
        • 0.14% fail on Shackle
        • 0.096% fail on Anchor
      • 0.096% fail on Condition (86% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.096% fail on Shackle bracket
      • 0.096% fail on Securing bolts
      • 0.048% fail on Spring eye
      • 0.048% fail on Anchor bracket
    • 0.34% fail on Front suspension joints (72% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.29% fail on Wheel bearings (77% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Front (75% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.048% fail on Rear
    • 0.14% fail on Bonded suspension (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.048% fail on General condition
    • 0.048% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.048% fail on Condition
  • 8.2% fail on Tyres (26% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Condition (54% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.19% fail on Size/type
    • 0.048% fail on Valve stem
  • 7.8% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.1% fail on Wipers
    • 2.3% fail on Washers
    • 0.82% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.24% fail on Mirrors (71% better than other 2009 vans)
  • 5.9% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (150% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Exhaust system (180% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.53% fail on Cap (190% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on System
      • 0.14% fail on Pipe
      • 0.096% fail on Tank
    • 0.63% fail on Emissions (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.43% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 5.4% fail on Brakes (59% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Brake performance (57% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.87% fail on Rear wheels (70% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.77% fail on Parking brake performance (82% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.14% fail on Service brake performance
    • 1.7% fail on Hub components (59% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.96% fail on Brake pads (71% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.048% fail on Brake calipers
    • 0.63% fail on ABS
    • 0.43% fail on Parking brake (56% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.43% fail on Condition (55% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.14% fail on Hydraulic systems (96% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Components (96% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.048% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.048% fail on Pipes
        • 0.048% fail on Hoses
    • 0.14% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.096% fail on Service brake control components (84% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.096% fail on Pedal (84% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.096% fail on Anti-slip (82% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.048% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.048% fail on Cable
  • 1.7% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.67% fail on Doors
      • 0.43% fail on Passengers other (190% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Drivers
      • 0.096% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.43% fail on Engine mountings (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.24% fail on Seats
      • 0.14% fail on Passengers
      • 0.096% fail on Drivers
    • 0.19% fail on Spare wheel
    • 0.096% fail on Load security
      • 0.048% fail on Bootlid
      • 0.048% fail on Tailgate
    • 0.048% fail on Body condition
  • 1.4% fail on Steering (63% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Steering system (65% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.96% fail on Track rod end (63% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.048% fail on Free play
        • 0.048% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.29% fail on Power steering
      • 0.24% fail on Operation
      • 0.096% fail on Other components
  • 0.63% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (61% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.58% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.43% fail on Condition
      • 0.14% fail on Requirements
      • 0.048% fail on Attachment
      • 0.048% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.048% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.048% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 0.63% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.63% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.19% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.19% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

  • Fiat Doblo (2001 - 2009)
    Utilitarian looking. Bigger than Berlingo. Available with seven seats. Best with 1.3 Multijet diesel. Handles decently.