FIAT Doblo MOT Results

Registered in 2009
64.0% pass rate
from 2,241 tests in 2020
(22% better than other 2009 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Doblo is unusually good or bad.

  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (41% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Stop lamp (43% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.27% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.045% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (67% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Direction indicators (55% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Flashing type (55% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 1.0% fail on Individual direction indicators (41% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.18% fail on Side repeaters (78% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.045% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.98% fail on Position lamps (73% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.89% fail on Position lamp (75% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.045% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.045% fail on Switch
    • 0.67% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.40% fail on Electrical equipment (69% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.13% fail on Horn (86% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.045% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.36% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (83% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Rear fog lamp (83% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.36% fail on Rear fog lamp (83% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.089% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.089% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 8.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 8.3% fail on Exhaust emissions (23% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 5.7% fail on Compression ignition
        • 3.0% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 2.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.49% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.27% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (6 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.089% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.045% fail on Particulate filter
          • 0.045% fail on Other emission control equipment
      • 2.8% fail on Spark ignition (110% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 1.0% fail on Catalyst emissions (8 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.67% fail on Emissions not tested (13 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.45% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.36% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.045% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.045% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.089% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.089% fail on Undertray (5 times worse than other 2009 vans)
  • 7.6% fail on Tyres (22% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on Condition (69% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.18% fail on Size/type
  • 6.7% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.0% fail on Exhaust system (120% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Fuel system (77% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.58% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (150% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Tank
      • 0.18% fail on Pipe
      • 0.089% fail on System
      • 0.045% fail on Hose
    • 0.94% fail on Transmission (74% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.89% fail on Drive shafts (72% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.89% fail on Joints (72% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.045% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.045% fail on Joints
    • 0.36% fail on Doors
      • 0.36% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.31% fail on Door condition
        • 0.045% fail on Catch
    • 0.31% fail on Spare wheel (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Carrier
      • 0.13% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.27% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.22% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.045% fail on Bracket
    • 0.13% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.13% fail on Seats
      • 0.089% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.045% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.13% fail on Boot lid (9 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Boot lid condition (13 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.045% fail on Load security
      • 0.045% fail on Loading door
  • 6.6% fail on Visibility (23% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on Wipers
    • 2.4% fail on Washers (39% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.31% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.31% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.27% fail on View to rear (69% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Mirrors (68% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.22% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.045% fail on Bonnet
  • 6.0% fail on Suspension (62% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Suspension arms (37% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint (37% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint dust cover (74% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.045% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.045% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.89% fail on Macpherson strut (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.45% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.089% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.80% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.80% fail on Anti-roll bars (86% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Linkage ball joints (85% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.13% fail on Pins and bushes (87% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (89% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.089% fail on Ball joint (83% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.36% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.18% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.13% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.045% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.18% fail on Wheel bearings (87% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Springs (96% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Leaf springs (92% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.045% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
        • 0.045% fail on Shackle bracket
        • 0.045% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
      • 0.045% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.045% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.045% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.045% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.045% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 5.7% fail on Brakes (61% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Mechanical brake components (44% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.9% fail on Brake discs
      • 1.1% fail on Brake linings and pads (66% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Brake pads (65% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.045% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.045% fail on Cable
    • 2.3% fail on Brake performance (70% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance (47% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt (46% better than other 2009 vans)
          • 1.0% fail on Service brake performance (43% better than other 2009 vans)
          • 0.31% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.62% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (88% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.62% fail on Rbt (sp) (88% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.54% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.31% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.22% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.36% fail on Parking brake performance (83% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.36% fail on Rbt (82% better than other 2009 vans)
          • 0.36% fail on Parking brake performance (80% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.045% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.40% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (60% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Anti-lock braking system (55% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.36% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.36% fail on Lever
    • 0.13% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (80% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Pedal (73% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.13% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.089% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.089% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.089% fail on Rigid brake pipes (97% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.089% fail on Load sensing valves
  • 1.6% fail on Steering (67% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Steering linkage components (67% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Track rod end (66% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.045% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.22% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.13% fail on Operation
      • 0.089% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.045% fail on Power steering
      • 0.045% fail on Other components
    • 0.045% fail on Steering play
      • 0.045% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.58% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (75% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.36% fail on Seat belts (74% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Condition (73% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.089% fail on Requirements
      • 0.045% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.045% fail on Attachment
    • 0.22% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (77% better than other 2009 vans)
  • 0.31% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.31% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.22% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.13% fail on Attachment
    • 0.089% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

  • Fiat Doblo (2001 - 2009)
    Utilitarian looking. Bigger than Berlingo. Available with seven seats. Best with 1.3 Multijet diesel. Handles decently.