FIAT Doblo MOT Results

Registered in 2010
60.0% pass rate
from 2,765 tests in 2020
(6.1% better than other 2010 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Doblo is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (22% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.9% fail on Stop lamp (20% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.33% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.6% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.036% fail on Matched pair
      • 0.036% fail on Dipswitch
      • 0.036% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.6% fail on Side repeaters (92% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.14% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.0% fail on Position lamps (44% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Position lamp (44% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.072% fail on All position lamps
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (76% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.83% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.36% fail on Horn
      • 0.29% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.14% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.036% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.43% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (77% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.43% fail on Rear fog lamp (77% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.43% fail on Rear fog lamp (77% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.43% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.40% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.036% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 0.40% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.14% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.14% fail on Switch
    • 0.072% fail on Daytime running lamps (16 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.036% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.036% fail on Main beam tell-tale
      • 0.036% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 16% fail on Suspension
    • 7.1% fail on Springs (91% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 7.0% fail on Coil springs (180% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 6.9% fail on Coil spring (180% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.14% fail on Mounting (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Leaf springs (91% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.036% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
        • 0.036% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
        • 0.036% fail on Shackle bracket
    • 4.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.8% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.4% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.54% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.40% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.29% fail on Linkage
      • 0.18% fail on Pins and bushes (81% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.072% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.072% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (87% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.036% fail on Anti-roll bar
    • 3.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.6% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.25% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.072% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.072% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.0% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.0% fail on Macpherson strut (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.58% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.58% fail on Wheel bearings (57% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.40% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.072% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.072% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.036% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.25% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.14% fail on Axles
      • 0.14% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.072% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.072% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.036% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.036% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 8.7% fail on Tyres (46% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.9% fail on Tread depth (29% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on Condition (72% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Size/type
  • 7.6% fail on Brakes (44% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Brake performance (53% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.54% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.036% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.036% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.94% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (79% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.94% fail on Rbt (sp) (78% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.43% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.43% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.29% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.18% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.43% fail on Parking brake performance (74% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.40% fail on Rbt (76% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.33% fail on Parking brake performance (77% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.072% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.036% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.036% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.11% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.5% fail on Mechanical brake components (49% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Brake linings and pads (60% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Brake pads (60% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.3% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.14% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.11% fail on Cable
        • 0.036% fail on Lever
    • 1.6% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.90% fail on Pedal (72% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.69% fail on Hand lever (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.80% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.80% fail on Lever
    • 0.40% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (55% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on Anti-lock braking system (57% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.072% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.18% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.18% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.11% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.036% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.036% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.036% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.036% fail on Load sensing valves
  • 6.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.9% fail on Compression ignition
        • 2.1% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 1.7% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.43% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.072% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.036% fail on Pre 01/01/1980 visual
        • 0.036% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 1.6% fail on Spark ignition (54% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.98% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.40% fail on Catalyst emissions (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.25% fail on Emissions not tested (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.036% fail on Non catalyst emissions
    • 0.69% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.47% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.14% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.072% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 5.6% fail on Visibility (29% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Wipers (29% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Washers (32% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.51% fail on View to rear
      • 0.51% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.33% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.33% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.036% fail on Driver's view
  • 5.0% fail on Body, chassis, structure (24% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Exhaust system (93% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.72% fail on Transmission (80% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.69% fail on Drive shafts (78% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.65% fail on Joints (79% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.036% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.036% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.036% fail on Joints
    • 0.69% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.22% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.18% fail on Hose
      • 0.11% fail on Tank
      • 0.11% fail on Pipe
      • 0.072% fail on System
    • 0.47% fail on Doors
      • 0.25% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.25% fail on Door condition
      • 0.14% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.14% fail on Door condition
      • 0.072% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.072% fail on Door condition
    • 0.33% fail on Body
      • 0.29% fail on Other body component
      • 0.036% fail on Panel
    • 0.25% fail on Engine mounting (180% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Engine mounting condition (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.14% fail on Undertray
    • 0.11% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.072% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.072% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.072% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.036% fail on Spare wheel condition
      • 0.036% fail on Carrier
    • 0.072% fail on Load security
      • 0.036% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.036% fail on Tailgate condition
      • 0.036% fail on Loading door
    • 0.036% fail on Chassis
      • 0.036% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.036% fail on Floor
    • 0.036% fail on Seats
      • 0.036% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 1.2% fail on Steering (74% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.65% fail on Power steering
      • 0.29% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.22% fail on Other components
      • 0.18% fail on Operation
    • 0.43% fail on Steering linkage components (89% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on Track rod end (91% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.11% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.072% fail on Operation
      • 0.036% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.036% fail on Steering wheel
  • 0.65% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (64% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.54% fail on Seat belts (49% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Condition
      • 0.072% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.072% fail on Attachment
    • 0.072% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (90% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.036% fail on Airbags
      • 0.036% fail on Passengers airbag
  • 0.58% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.58% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.36% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.29% fail on Attachment
    • 0.072% fail on Condition
  • 0.036% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.036% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review

  • Fiat Doblo (2010 on)
    Huge space. Massively practical. Great diesel engines. Decent ride quality and hardwearing interior.