FIAT Doblo MOT Results

Registered in 2010
62.3% pass rate
from 2,519 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Doblo is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Suspension (25% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 8.6% fail on Coil springs (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 8.5% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Location
    • 4.7% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.9% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (35% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (62% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.16% fail on Attachment
      • 0.040% fail on Condition
    • 2.8% fail on Shock absorbers (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.8% fail on Condition (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Suspension arms (40% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (40% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.040% fail on Attachment
    • 0.79% fail on Drive shafts (72% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.75% fail on Front drive shafts (73% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.75% fail on Constant velocity joints (72% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.040% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.040% fail on Drive shafts
    • 0.67% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.67% fail on Condition
    • 0.40% fail on Trailing arms (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.24% fail on Front suspension joints (75% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.20% fail on Radius arms (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Wheel bearings (86% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Front (86% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.040% fail on Rear
    • 0.12% fail on General condition (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.12% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.079% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.040% fail on Condition
    • 0.040% fail on Leaf springs
      • 0.040% fail on Pins and bushes
        • 0.040% fail on Shackle
    • 0.040% fail on Axles
      • 0.040% fail on Clearance
    • 0.040% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.040% fail on Component mounting
  • 17% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (31% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.5% fail on Stop lamp (43% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.1% fail on Side repeaters (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Individual lamps (39% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.16% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.9% fail on Position lamps (59% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Front lamps (55% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Rear lamps (72% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.079% fail on All position lamps
    • 2.6% fail on Registration plate lamp (75% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.040% fail on Matched pair
    • 0.52% fail on Rear fog lamp (71% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Fog lamp (75% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Switch (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.040% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.48% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.48% fail on Horn
    • 0.24% fail on Battery
    • 0.20% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.12% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.12% fail on Switch
    • 0.040% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 9.3% fail on Tyres (50% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.9% fail on Condition (83% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.8% fail on Tread depth (31% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.12% fail on Size/type
    • 0.040% fail on Valve stem
  • 6.6% fail on Brakes (44% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Brake performance (56% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.79% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.75% fail on Rear wheels (67% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.67% fail on Parking brake performance (80% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.64% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.16% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.040% fail on Parking brake operation
      • 0.040% fail on Brake operation
    • 2.0% fail on Hub components (55% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Brake pads (53% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Brake discs (52% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.99% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.99% fail on Pedal
        • 0.99% fail on Anti-slip (71% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.36% fail on Hydraulic systems (87% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Components (86% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.28% fail on Hoses
        • 0.040% fail on Pipes
        • 0.040% fail on Valves
    • 0.24% fail on ABS
    • 0.12% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.12% fail on Cable
    • 0.079% fail on Electronic stability system
  • 5.8% fail on Driver's view of the road (29% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Wipers
    • 2.0% fail on Washers (36% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.56% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.44% fail on Mirrors
  • 2.2% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 1.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.71% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.28% fail on Cap
      • 0.20% fail on System
      • 0.12% fail on Tank
      • 0.079% fail on Pipe
      • 0.040% fail on Hose
    • 0.28% fail on Emissions (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.24% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 1.6% fail on Steering (57% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.79% fail on Power steering (91% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.60% fail on Operation (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.12% fail on Other components
    • 0.40% fail on Steering system (88% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Track rod end (93% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.079% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.040% fail on Free play
        • 0.040% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.40% fail on Steering operation (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.040% fail on Steering control
      • 0.040% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.040% fail on Locking devices
  • 0.64% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.64% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.60% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (48% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.24% fail on Body condition
    • 0.24% fail on Doors
      • 0.12% fail on Drivers
      • 0.12% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.079% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.040% fail on Load security
      • 0.040% fail on Loading door
  • 0.32% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (75% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.28% fail on Seat belts (60% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Condition
    • 0.040% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.040% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 0.28% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.20% fail on Attachment
    • 0.079% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

  • Fiat Doblo (2010 on)
    Huge space. Massively practical. Great diesel engines. Decent ride quality and hardwearing interior.