MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » FIAT » Doblo » 2013
Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

FIAT Doblo MOT Results

Registered in 2013
79.2% pass rate
from 7,297 tests in 2017
(31% better than other 2013 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2013 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Doblo is unusually good or bad.

  • 10% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (47% better than other 2013 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.2% fail on Stop lamp (53% better than other 2013 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Headlamps (24% better than other 2013 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp (24% better than other 2013 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Position lamps (77% better than other 2013 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Front lamps (74% better than other 2013 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Rear lamps (91% better than other 2013 vans)
      • 0.014% fail on All position lamps
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate lamp (85% better than other 2013 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.84% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.32% fail on Individual lamps (61% better than other 2013 vans)
        • 0.096% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.34% fail on Horn
    • 0.19% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.082% fail on Rear fog lamp (92% better than other 2013 vans)
      • 0.069% fail on Fog lamp (93% better than other 2013 vans)
      • 0.027% fail on Switch
      • 0.014% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.082% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.041% fail on Battery
    • 0.041% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.041% fail on Switch
    • 0.027% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 7.2% fail on Suspension (44% worse than other 2013 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Coil springs (4 times worse than other 2013 vans)
      • 3.7% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2013 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Location (4 times worse than other 2013 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (49% worse than other 2013 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (50% better than other 2013 vans)
      • 0.082% fail on Linkage condition
    • 1.1% fail on Shock absorbers (61% worse than other 2013 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Condition (61% worse than other 2013 vans)
    • 0.63% fail on Macpherson strut (110% worse than other 2013 vans)
      • 0.63% fail on Condition (110% worse than other 2013 vans)
    • 0.33% fail on Suspension arms (52% better than other 2013 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (55% better than other 2013 vans)
      • 0.027% fail on Attachment
    • 0.19% fail on Wheel bearings (58% better than other 2013 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Front (65% better than other 2013 vans)
      • 0.069% fail on Rear
    • 0.15% fail on Drive shafts (81% better than other 2013 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Front drive shafts (80% better than other 2013 vans)
        • 0.14% fail on Constant velocity joints (82% better than other 2013 vans)
        • 0.014% fail on Couplings
    • 0.14% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.069% fail on General condition
    • 0.027% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.027% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.014% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.014% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.014% fail on Axles
      • 0.014% fail on Clearance
    • 0.014% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
    • 0.014% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.014% fail on Component mounting
  • 3.7% fail on Tyres (22% better than other 2013 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on Tread depth (48% better than other 2013 vans)
    • 0.11% fail on Valve stem
    • 0.069% fail on Size/type
  • 3.2% fail on Brakes (53% better than other 2013 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Hub components (70% better than other 2013 vans)
      • 0.89% fail on Brake pads (71% better than other 2013 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Brake discs (48% better than other 2013 vans)
      • 0.014% fail on Brake calipers
    • 0.84% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.84% fail on Pedal
        • 0.79% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.041% fail on Condition
    • 0.69% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.69% fail on Condition
    • 0.59% fail on Brake performance (74% better than other 2013 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Rear wheels (78% better than other 2013 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.15% fail on Front wheels (68% better than other 2013 vans)
      • 0.055% fail on Parking brake performance (96% better than other 2013 vans)
      • 0.041% fail on Service brake performance (82% better than other 2013 vans)
      • 0.014% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.11% fail on Hydraulic systems (79% better than other 2013 vans)
      • 0.096% fail on Components (76% better than other 2013 vans)
        • 0.041% fail on Hoses (78% better than other 2013 vans)
        • 0.041% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.014% fail on Pipes
      • 0.027% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 0.11% fail on ABS
    • 0.096% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.055% fail on Cable
      • 0.041% fail on Lever
    • 0.069% fail on Prescribed areas (19 times worse than other 2013 vans)
      • 0.069% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings (19 times worse than other 2013 vans)
    • 0.014% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.014% fail on Restricted movement
  • 2.5% fail on Driver's view of the road (62% better than other 2013 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Washers (48% better than other 2013 vans)
    • 0.96% fail on Wipers (72% better than other 2013 vans)
    • 0.25% fail on Windscreen (73% better than other 2013 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Mirrors (69% better than other 2013 vans)
    • 0.027% fail on Bonnet
  • 0.62% fail on Steering
    • 0.27% fail on Power steering
      • 0.16% fail on Operation
      • 0.12% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.014% fail on Pump
    • 0.19% fail on Steering operation (2 times worse than other 2013 vans)
    • 0.14% fail on Steering system (78% better than other 2013 vans)
      • 0.096% fail on Track rod end (77% better than other 2013 vans)
      • 0.041% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.014% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.027% fail on Steering control
      • 0.027% fail on Steering lock (6 times worse than other 2013 vans)
  • 0.62% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.32% fail on Body condition
    • 0.22% fail on Doors
      • 0.11% fail on Drivers (2 times worse than other 2013 vans)
      • 0.082% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.027% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.027% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.027% fail on Spare wheel
    • 0.014% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.014% fail on Chassis
    • 0.014% fail on Seats
      • 0.014% fail on Drivers
    • 0.014% fail on Load security
      • 0.014% fail on Loading door
  • 0.52% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 0.26% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.16% fail on Fuel system (52% better than other 2013 vans)
      • 0.069% fail on Cap
      • 0.055% fail on System
      • 0.014% fail on Tank
      • 0.014% fail on Hose
      • 0.014% fail on Pipe
    • 0.082% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.055% fail on Emissions (4 times worse than other 2013 vans)
  • 0.21% fail on Registration plates and VIN (63% better than other 2013 vans)
    • 0.21% fail on Registration plate (63% better than other 2013 vans)
  • 0.12% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (83% better than other 2013 vans)
    • 0.069% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (77% better than other 2013 vans)
      • 0.055% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (80% better than other 2013 vans)
      • 0.014% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.055% fail on Seat belts (88% better than other 2013 vans)
      • 0.041% fail on Condition (89% better than other 2013 vans)
      • 0.014% fail on Attachment
  • 0.082% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.082% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

  • Fiat Doblo (2010 on)
    Huge space. Massively practical. Great diesel engines. Decent ride quality and hardwearing interior.