MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » FIAT » Doblo » 2017

FIAT Doblo MOT Results

Registered in 2017
75.8% pass rate
from 2,676 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Doblo is unusually good or bad.

  • 7.0% fail on Suspension (140% worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 4.3% fail on Springs (3 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 4.3% fail on Coil springs (4 times worse than other 2017 vans)
        • 4.2% fail on Coil spring (4 times worse than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.075% fail on Mounting (12 times worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Suspension arms (78% worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.93% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.49% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.037% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.037% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.71% fail on Macpherson strut (14 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.45% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (17 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Pins and bushes (17 times worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.52% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.26% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.26% fail on Anti-roll bars (66% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.075% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.075% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.037% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.037% fail on Linkage
      • 0.037% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.037% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.075% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.037% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.037% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.037% fail on Axles
      • 0.037% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.037% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 6.0% fail on Tyres (43% worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 3.6% fail on Condition (60% worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.11% fail on Size/type
  • 5.0% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (41% better than other 2017 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.5% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.2% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.41% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim (46% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim (48% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.82% fail on Stop lamp (49% better than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.45% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (71% better than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.22% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.22% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.22% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.19% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.11% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.075% fail on Reversing lamp switch (22 times worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.11% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.075% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.075% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.037% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.037% fail on Switch
    • 0.037% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.037% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 0.037% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.037% fail on Horn
  • 4.6% fail on Brakes
    • 1.9% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (5 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Pedal (4 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.64% fail on Hand lever (14 times worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Brake performance (48% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.71% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.71% fail on Rbt
          • 0.52% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.26% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.037% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.037% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.037% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.037% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.15% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (88% better than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Rbt (sp) (87% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.11% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.075% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.037% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.075% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.0% fail on Mechanical brake components (67% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.78% fail on Brake linings and pads (70% better than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.78% fail on Brake pads (70% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.45% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.45% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.86% fail on Parking brake control (2 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.86% fail on Lever (2 times worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.19% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.11% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.11% fail on Electronic stability control
  • 4.0% fail on Visibility
    • 2.0% fail on Washers
    • 1.5% fail on Wipers (44% better than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.30% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.26% fail on Windscreen
      • 0.037% fail on Window
    • 0.22% fail on View to rear
      • 0.22% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.075% fail on Bonnet
  • 3.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.0% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.2% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.22% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.15% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.037% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.037% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 0.82% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.67% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.075% fail on Emissions not tested (9 times worse than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.037% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.037% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.037% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.15% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.15% fail on Engine oil leaks
    • 0.037% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.037% fail on Undertray
  • 1.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.56% fail on Fuel system (6 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (13 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.037% fail on Tank
    • 0.37% fail on Transmission
      • 0.37% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.37% fail on Joints
    • 0.34% fail on Body
      • 0.30% fail on Other body component
      • 0.037% fail on Panel
    • 0.30% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.15% fail on Doors
      • 0.075% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.075% fail on Door condition
      • 0.037% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.037% fail on Door condition
      • 0.037% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.037% fail on Door condition
    • 0.11% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.11% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.037% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.037% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.037% fail on Carrier
    • 0.037% fail on Load security
      • 0.037% fail on Dropside
        • 0.037% fail on Dropside condition
    • 0.037% fail on Undertray
  • 0.45% fail on Steering
    • 0.26% fail on Steering gear (4 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Operation (30 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.037% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.19% fail on Power steering
      • 0.075% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.075% fail on Other components
      • 0.037% fail on Pump
  • 0.34% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.26% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.075% fail on Attachment
  • 0.15% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.15% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.11% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (83% better than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.11% fail on Seat belts (78% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Condition (76% better than other 2017 vans)
  • 0.037% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests
    • 0.037% fail on Doors
      • 0.037% fail on Passenger entrance/exit doors
Read the Honest John Review