MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » FIAT » Ducato » 2000

FIAT Ducato MOT Results

Registered in 2000
60.4% pass rate
from 1,750 tests in 2017
(20% better than other 2000 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Ducato is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (26% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 5.1% fail on Horn (84% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 5.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.5% fail on Position lamps (39% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Front lamps (48% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.11% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.057% fail on Switch
    • 4.4% fail on Registration plate lamp (49% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.9% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.97% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.29% fail on All direction indicators
    • 3.4% fail on Stop lamp (43% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (46% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Fog lamp (50% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Switch
      • 0.057% fail on Tell tale
    • 1.7% fail on Headlamps (57% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp (60% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Switch (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.057% fail on Dipswitch
    • 0.97% fail on Battery (54% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.57% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.23% fail on Lamp
      • 0.17% fail on Switch
      • 0.17% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.46% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.23% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.17% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.057% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 15% fail on Brakes (28% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 9.1% fail on Brake performance (29% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 3.5% fail on Front wheels (27% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 3.5% fail on Rear wheels (35% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.3% fail on Parking brake performance (57% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.17% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 7.8% fail on Hydraulic systems (23% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 7.4% fail on Components (22% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 6.6% fail on Pipes
        • 0.57% fail on Hoses (72% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.34% fail on Valves (88% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.057% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.34% fail on Leaks
      • 0.23% fail on Operation
    • 0.63% fail on Hub components (71% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Brake pads (71% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Brake discs (78% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.057% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 0.34% fail on Parking brake (72% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Condition (72% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.29% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.17% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
      • 0.11% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
    • 0.23% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.23% fail on Cable
    • 0.23% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.11% fail on ABS
    • 0.057% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.057% fail on Pedal
        • 0.057% fail on Anti-slip
  • 13% fail on Suspension (43% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 9.5% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 4.1% fail on Component mounting (39% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 3.9% fail on Subframe mounting (83% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 3.7% fail on Spring mounting
    • 2.2% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.4% fail on Rear (110% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.97% fail on Front
    • 1.2% fail on Drive shafts (66% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Front drive shafts (66% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Constant velocity joints (65% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Front suspension joints (57% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Shock absorbers (45% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Condition (45% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.80% fail on Suspension arms (79% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.80% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (78% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.17% fail on Leaf springs (86% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.057% fail on Pins and bushes
        • 0.057% fail on Shackle
      • 0.057% fail on Anchor bracket
      • 0.057% fail on Shackle bracket
    • 0.11% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.11% fail on Condition
    • 0.11% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.11% fail on Condition
    • 0.057% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.057% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.057% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.057% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 10% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.9% fail on Wipers
    • 4.7% fail on Washers
    • 0.34% fail on Windscreen (62% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.29% fail on Mirrors (67% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.057% fail on Bonnet
  • 5.6% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (33% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 3.0% fail on Chassis
    • 2.3% fail on Body condition (49% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.40% fail on Doors (60% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.11% fail on Drivers
      • 0.057% fail on Emergency exits
      • 0.057% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.11% fail on Spare wheel
    • 0.057% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.057% fail on Body security
    • 0.057% fail on Seats
      • 0.057% fail on Drivers
  • 4.2% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (52% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Exhaust system (46% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.51% fail on Fuel system (67% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on System
      • 0.11% fail on Tank
      • 0.11% fail on Cap
      • 0.057% fail on Pipe
    • 0.46% fail on Emissions (75% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.29% fail on Emissions not tested (65% better than other 2000 vans)
  • 3.3% fail on Tyres (56% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Condition (34% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Tread depth (75% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.057% fail on Size/type
  • 2.6% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (55% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Seat belts (53% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Prescribed areas (42% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Condition (88% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.057% fail on Installation check
        • 0.057% fail on Anchorage's
    • 0.11% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (82% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (82% better than other 2000 vans)
  • 1.7% fail on Steering (77% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.91% fail on Steering system (86% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.74% fail on Track rod end (81% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.057% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.057% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.057% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.51% fail on Power steering
      • 0.46% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.17% fail on Operation
    • 0.23% fail on Steering control
      • 0.11% fail on Steering column
      • 0.057% fail on Steering lock
      • 0.057% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.11% fail on Steering operation
  • 0.46% fail on Registration plates and VIN (68% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.46% fail on Registration plate (67% better than other 2000 vans)
  • 0.11% fail on Towbars
    • 0.11% fail on Vehicle structure
  • 0.11% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.11% fail on Attachment