MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » FIAT » Ducato » 2000

FIAT Ducato MOT Results

Registered in 2000
58.7% pass rate
from 1,689 tests in 2021
(12% better than other 2000 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Ducato is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.0% fail on Direction indicators (36% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 5.0% fail on Flashing type (36% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 3.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.6% fail on Side repeaters (77% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.36% fail on All direction indicators
    • 5.0% fail on Electrical equipment (60% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 4.2% fail on Horn (110% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.83% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.24% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.24% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp (37% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp levelling device (130% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Dipswitch
    • 3.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.8% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (34% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (34% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 2.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (34% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (52% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.59% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.59% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.18% fail on Outline marker lamps
      • 0.18% fail on Outline marker lamp
    • 0.18% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.18% fail on Switch
    • 0.18% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 16% fail on Brakes
    • 11% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 5.2% fail on Rbt
          • 4.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.18% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.12% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.059% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 4.7% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 4.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.5% fail on Service brake performance
          • 2.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.12% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.059% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.059% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 3.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (32% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 2.8% fail on Rbt (sp) (37% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.18% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.12% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 1.1% fail on Brake performance not tested (92% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Parking brake performance (63% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.53% fail on Rbt (65% better than other 2000 vans)
          • 0.41% fail on Parking brake performance (70% better than other 2000 vans)
          • 0.059% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.059% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.059% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.059% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 5.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.3% fail on Mechanical brake components (54% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.47% fail on Brake linings and pads (62% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.47% fail on Brake pads (62% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.47% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.47% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.41% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.36% fail on Cable
        • 0.059% fail on Linkage
    • 0.71% fail on Load sensing valves (68% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.47% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.41% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.24% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.18% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.059% fail on Valves
    • 0.36% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.36% fail on Lever
    • 0.36% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.36% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.36% fail on Other braking system component
    • 0.24% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.18% fail on Pedal
      • 0.059% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.059% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.059% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 12% fail on Suspension (35% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 7.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.1% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 2.0% fail on Sub-frames (67% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (83% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Sub-frame
    • 1.3% fail on Suspension arms (73% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.65% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.59% fail on Ball joint (79% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.059% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.89% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.71% fail on Springs (73% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.059% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.059% fail on Leaf spring
      • 0.059% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.059% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.36% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.30% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.30% fail on Anti-roll bars (90% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (84% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.059% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.059% fail on Linkage
  • 12% fail on Visibility
    • 6.3% fail on Wipers
    • 6.2% fail on Washers (29% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.18% fail on View to rear
      • 0.18% fail on Mirrors
  • 9.7% fail on Body, chassis, structure (36% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 3.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.12% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.12% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 2.9% fail on Chassis
      • 2.8% fail on Chassis condition
      • 0.059% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 2.7% fail on Exhaust system (31% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Transmission (68% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Drive shafts (58% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Joints (59% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.059% fail on Bearing housing
    • 0.30% fail on Body (71% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Panel
      • 0.12% fail on Other body component
      • 0.059% fail on Body condition
      • 0.059% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 0.24% fail on Floor
    • 0.18% fail on Fuel system (78% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.059% fail on Tank
      • 0.059% fail on Hose
      • 0.059% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.12% fail on Doors (87% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.059% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.059% fail on Catch
      • 0.059% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.059% fail on Door condition
    • 0.059% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.059% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.059% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.059% fail on Cabs
      • 0.059% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.059% fail on Undertray
  • 3.2% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.1% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.8% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.24% fail on Condition (71% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.059% fail on Attachment
    • 0.12% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 1.7% fail on Steering (75% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.95% fail on Steering linkage components (75% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.83% fail on Track rod end (75% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.059% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.059% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.36% fail on Steering gear (84% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Steering rack (87% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.059% fail on Operation
    • 0.36% fail on Power steering
      • 0.30% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.059% fail on Other components
    • 0.059% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.059% fail on Steering column
  • 1.5% fail on Tyres (66% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Condition (50% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.36% fail on Tread depth (84% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.059% fail on Size/type
  • 1.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (71% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.77% fail on Exhaust emissions (79% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.77% fail on Compression ignition (70% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.41% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.24% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (81% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 0.59% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.41% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.12% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.059% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 0.18% fail on Identification of the vehicle (82% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Registration plates (82% better than other 2000 vans)