MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » FIAT » Ducato » 2000
Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

FIAT Ducato MOT Results

Registered in 2000
58.7% pass rate
from 1,919 tests in 2020
(14% better than other 2000 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Ducato is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (11% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 6.1% fail on Electrical equipment (55% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 5.1% fail on Horn (90% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.83% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.31% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.052% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 4.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp (38% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp levelling device (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Dipswitch
    • 3.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.8% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.89% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.16% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.10% fail on Switch
    • 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim (26% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim (27% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.4% fail on Stop lamp (32% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (30% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 3.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (30% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 3.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (29% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.052% fail on Switch
    • 2.1% fail on Position lamps (35% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Position lamp (36% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on All position lamps
    • 1.6% fail on Outline marker lamps (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Outline marker lamp (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on All outline marker lamps
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (58% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.36% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.36% fail on Switch
    • 0.10% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.10% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.10% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 13% fail on Brakes (26% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 7.7% fail on Brake performance (33% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 4.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.1% fail on Rbt
          • 3.4% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.052% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 2.8% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (48% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 2.8% fail on Rbt (sp) (48% better than other 2000 vans)
          • 2.0% fail on Service brake performance (41% better than other 2000 vans)
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance (55% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (54% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt (sp) (57% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.21% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.73% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.47% fail on Parking brake performance (68% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.47% fail on Rbt (67% better than other 2000 vans)
          • 0.31% fail on Parking brake performance (75% better than other 2000 vans)
          • 0.16% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 6.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.4% fail on Mechanical brake components (52% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.63% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.63% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.52% fail on Brake linings and pads (60% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.52% fail on Brake pads (59% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.31% fail on Cable
    • 0.57% fail on Load sensing valves (73% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.36% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.31% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.31% fail on Lever
    • 0.31% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.31% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.21% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
        • 0.052% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
        • 0.052% fail on Other braking system component
    • 0.21% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.16% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.052% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.10% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (84% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Pedal (80% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.052% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.052% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 12% fail on Suspension (38% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 6.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (25% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Sub-frames (75% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (97% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Sub-frame
    • 1.8% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.2% fail on Suspension arms (77% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.73% fail on Ball joint (75% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Ball joint dust cover (74% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Pins and bushes (85% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.0% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.83% fail on Springs (69% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.73% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.10% fail on Coil springs (89% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.052% fail on Coil spring
        • 0.052% fail on Mounting
      • 0.052% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.052% fail on Leaf spring
    • 0.26% fail on Other suspension component (69% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.21% fail on Anti-roll bars (94% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (88% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.052% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.10% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.052% fail on Operation
      • 0.052% fail on Suspension unit
    • 0.052% fail on Axles
      • 0.052% fail on Axle
    • 0.052% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.052% fail on Macpherson strut
  • 10% fail on Body, chassis, structure (33% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Chassis
      • 3.4% fail on Chassis condition
      • 0.052% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 3.0% fail on Exhaust system (29% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.052% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.052% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 1.7% fail on Transmission (61% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Drive shafts (49% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Joints (48% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.052% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.052% fail on Joints
    • 0.36% fail on Fuel system (64% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Hose
      • 0.10% fail on Pipe
      • 0.10% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.052% fail on System
    • 0.36% fail on Body (69% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Panel
      • 0.10% fail on Other body component (80% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.052% fail on Body condition
    • 0.36% fail on Cabs
      • 0.31% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.052% fail on Steps
    • 0.21% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.16% fail on Doors (82% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.16% fail on Door condition
    • 0.16% fail on Seats (74% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.052% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.052% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.052% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.052% fail on Bracket
    • 0.052% fail on Load security
      • 0.052% fail on Loading door
    • 0.052% fail on Floor
    • 0.052% fail on Undertray
  • 10% fail on Visibility
    • 5.6% fail on Washers
    • 5.3% fail on Wipers
    • 0.10% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.052% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.052% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.052% fail on Windscreen
  • 3.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (32% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Seat belts (29% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.42% fail on Condition
      • 0.052% fail on Attachment
    • 0.21% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.052% fail on Airbags
      • 0.052% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 2.4% fail on Tyres (52% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Condition
    • 0.99% fail on Tread depth (66% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.052% fail on Size/type
  • 1.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (75% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Exhaust emissions (73% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Compression ignition (66% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.57% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (67% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.47% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.052% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 0.10% fail on Spark ignition (92% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.052% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.052% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.21% fail on Fluid leaks (81% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Engine oil leaks (88% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.052% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.052% fail on Other leaks
  • 1.3% fail on Steering (81% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.52% fail on Power steering
      • 0.47% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.10% fail on Operation
      • 0.052% fail on Other components
    • 0.47% fail on Steering linkage components (88% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.42% fail on Track rod end (88% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.052% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.21% fail on Steering gear (89% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Steering rack (91% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.052% fail on Operation
    • 0.052% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.052% fail on Steering wheel
  • 0.42% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.42% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.052% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests
    • 0.052% fail on Doors
      • 0.052% fail on Passenger entrance/exit doors
  • 0.052% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.052% fail on Belt(s)/padding