Do you want the Road Tax system to change? Do you have thoughts on the potential changes to the Road Tax system? | No thanks
FIAT Ducato MOT Results
Registered in 200060.4% pass rate
from 1,750 tests in 2017
(20% better than other 2000 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Ducato is unusually good or bad.
-
21% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(26% better than other 2000 vans)
- 5.1% fail on Horn (84% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 5.0% fail on Headlamp aim
-
4.5% fail on
Position lamps
(39% better than other 2000 vans)
- 2.5% fail on Front lamps (48% better than other 2000 vans)
- 2.4% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.11% fail on All position lamps
- 0.057% fail on Switch
- 4.4% fail on Registration plate lamp (49% better than other 2000 vans)
-
4.0% fail on
Direction indicators
-
4.0% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.9% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.97% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.29% fail on All direction indicators
-
4.0% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.4% fail on Stop lamp (43% better than other 2000 vans)
-
2.3% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(46% better than other 2000 vans)
- 2.1% fail on Fog lamp (50% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.17% fail on Switch
- 0.057% fail on Tell tale
-
1.7% fail on
Headlamps
(57% better than other 2000 vans)
- 1.5% fail on Headlamp (60% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.17% fail on Switch (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.057% fail on Dipswitch
- 0.97% fail on Battery (54% better than other 2000 vans)
-
0.57% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.23% fail on Lamp
- 0.17% fail on Switch
- 0.17% fail on Tell tale
- 0.46% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.23% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.17% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.057% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
15% fail on
Brakes
(28% better than other 2000 vans)
-
9.1% fail on
Brake performance
(29% better than other 2000 vans)
- 3.5% fail on Front wheels (27% better than other 2000 vans)
- 3.5% fail on Rear wheels (35% better than other 2000 vans)
- 2.5% fail on Service brake performance
- 2.3% fail on Parking brake performance (57% better than other 2000 vans)
- 1.7% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.17% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
7.8% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(23% better than other 2000 vans)
-
7.4% fail on
Components
(22% better than other 2000 vans)
- 6.6% fail on Pipes
- 0.57% fail on Hoses (72% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.34% fail on Valves (88% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.057% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.34% fail on Leaks
- 0.23% fail on Operation
-
7.4% fail on
Components
(22% better than other 2000 vans)
-
0.63% fail on
Hub components
(71% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.40% fail on Brake pads (71% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.17% fail on Brake discs (78% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.057% fail on Wheel cylinder
-
0.34% fail on
Parking brake
(72% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.34% fail on Condition (72% better than other 2000 vans)
-
0.29% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.17% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
- 0.11% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
-
0.23% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.23% fail on Cable
- 0.23% fail on Restricted movement
- 0.11% fail on ABS
-
0.057% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.057% fail on
Pedal
- 0.057% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.057% fail on
Pedal
-
9.1% fail on
Brake performance
(29% better than other 2000 vans)
-
13% fail on
Suspension
(43% better than other 2000 vans)
-
9.5% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 4.1% fail on Component mounting (39% better than other 2000 vans)
- 3.9% fail on Subframe mounting (83% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 3.7% fail on Spring mounting
-
2.2% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 1.4% fail on Rear (110% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.97% fail on Front
-
1.2% fail on
Drive shafts
(66% better than other 2000 vans)
-
1.2% fail on
Front drive shafts
(66% better than other 2000 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Constant velocity joints (65% better than other 2000 vans)
-
1.2% fail on
Front drive shafts
(66% better than other 2000 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Front suspension joints (57% better than other 2000 vans)
-
1.1% fail on
Shock absorbers
(45% better than other 2000 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Condition (45% better than other 2000 vans)
-
0.80% fail on
Suspension arms
(79% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.80% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (78% better than other 2000 vans)
-
0.17% fail on
Leaf springs
(86% better than other 2000 vans)
-
0.057% fail on
Pins and bushes
- 0.057% fail on Shackle
- 0.057% fail on Anchor bracket
- 0.057% fail on Shackle bracket
-
0.057% fail on
Pins and bushes
-
0.11% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.11% fail on Condition
-
0.11% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.11% fail on Condition
-
0.057% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.057% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.057% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.057% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
9.5% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
10% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 5.9% fail on Wipers
- 4.7% fail on Washers
- 0.34% fail on Windscreen (62% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.29% fail on Mirrors (67% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.057% fail on Bonnet
-
5.6% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(33% better than other 2000 vans)
-
3.0% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 3.0% fail on Chassis
- 2.3% fail on Body condition (49% better than other 2000 vans)
-
0.40% fail on
Doors
(60% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.17% fail on Passengers front
- 0.11% fail on Drivers
- 0.057% fail on Emergency exits
- 0.057% fail on Passengers other
- 0.11% fail on Spare wheel
- 0.057% fail on Speedometer
- 0.057% fail on Body security
-
0.057% fail on
Seats
- 0.057% fail on Drivers
-
3.0% fail on
Vehicle structure
-
4.2% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(52% better than other 2000 vans)
- 3.1% fail on Exhaust system (46% better than other 2000 vans)
-
0.51% fail on
Fuel system
(67% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.23% fail on System
- 0.11% fail on Tank
- 0.11% fail on Cap
- 0.057% fail on Pipe
- 0.46% fail on Emissions (75% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.29% fail on Emissions not tested (65% better than other 2000 vans)
-
3.3% fail on
Tyres
(56% better than other 2000 vans)
- 2.2% fail on Condition (34% better than other 2000 vans)
- 1.0% fail on Tread depth (75% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.057% fail on Size/type
-
2.6% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(55% better than other 2000 vans)
-
2.5% fail on
Seat belts
(53% better than other 2000 vans)
- 2.3% fail on Prescribed areas (42% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.11% fail on Condition (88% better than other 2000 vans)
-
0.057% fail on
Installation check
- 0.057% fail on Anchorage's
-
0.11% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(82% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.11% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (82% better than other 2000 vans)
-
2.5% fail on
Seat belts
(53% better than other 2000 vans)
-
1.7% fail on
Steering
(77% better than other 2000 vans)
-
0.91% fail on
Steering system
(86% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.74% fail on Track rod end (81% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.057% fail on Steering rack
- 0.057% fail on Ball joint
- 0.057% fail on Steering arm
-
0.51% fail on
Power steering
- 0.46% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.17% fail on Operation
-
0.23% fail on
Steering control
- 0.11% fail on Steering column
- 0.057% fail on Steering lock
- 0.057% fail on Steering wheel
- 0.11% fail on Steering operation
-
0.91% fail on
Steering system
(86% better than other 2000 vans)
-
0.46% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
(68% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.46% fail on Registration plate (67% better than other 2000 vans)
-
0.11% fail on
Towbars
- 0.11% fail on Vehicle structure
-
0.11% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.11% fail on Attachment