MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » FIAT » Fiorino » 2010
Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

FIAT Fiorino MOT Results

Registered in 2010
55.0% pass rate
from 931 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Fiorino is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 6.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.9% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.32% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.11% fail on All direction indicators
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.11% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.6% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.11% fail on All position lamps
    • 1.5% fail on Reversing lamps (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Reversing lamps (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 1.4% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.86% fail on Horn
      • 0.43% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.11% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.64% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (67% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.64% fail on Rear fog lamp (66% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.64% fail on Rear fog lamp (66% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.11% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 15% fail on Suspension
    • 8.3% fail on Springs (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 8.3% fail on Coil springs (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 8.3% fail on Coil spring (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.11% fail on Mounting
    • 2.9% fail on Anti-roll bars (47% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.97% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.32% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.21% fail on Linkage
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.5% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.32% fail on Pins and bushes (82% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.5% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.2% fail on Macpherson strut (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.86% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.54% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.21% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.11% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.32% fail on Wheel bearings (76% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.21% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.21% fail on Sub-frame (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
  • 11% fail on Visibility (44% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.9% fail on Washers (64% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.3% fail on Wipers
    • 1.8% fail on View to rear (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Mirrors (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.54% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.54% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.21% fail on Driver's view
  • 9.8% fail on Tyres (63% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.5% fail on Tread depth (45% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.7% fail on Condition (98% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.43% fail on Size/type
  • 7.9% fail on Brakes (41% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.9% fail on Mechanical brake components (40% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.97% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.86% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.11% fail on Brake drums
    • 2.1% fail on Brake performance (67% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.97% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.97% fail on Rbt
          • 0.75% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.21% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.64% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (85% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.64% fail on Rbt (sp) (85% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.43% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.43% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.32% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.11% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.32% fail on Parking brake performance (81% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.32% fail on Rbt (80% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.32% fail on Parking brake performance (78% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.8% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Pedal (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Hand lever
    • 1.4% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.2% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.21% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.75% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.75% fail on Lever
    • 0.21% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.11% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.11% fail on Brake fluid
  • 3.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (43% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Exhaust emissions (48% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Compression ignition (61% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.86% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (61% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.75% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (62% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.11% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 1.1% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.54% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.32% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.21% fail on Other leaks
  • 3.0% fail on Body, chassis, structure (54% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.97% fail on Transmission (73% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.86% fail on Drive shafts (73% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.75% fail on Joints (76% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.11% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.11% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.11% fail on Joints
    • 0.64% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.64% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.43% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.11% fail on Tank
      • 0.11% fail on System
    • 0.21% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.21% fail on Doors
      • 0.21% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.21% fail on Door condition
    • 0.11% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.11% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.11% fail on Body
      • 0.11% fail on Other body component
    • 0.11% fail on Undertray
  • 1.6% fail on Steering (66% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.97% fail on Steering linkage components (76% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.97% fail on Track rod end (74% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.43% fail on Power steering
      • 0.21% fail on Operation
      • 0.11% fail on Rams
      • 0.11% fail on Other components
    • 0.21% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.21% fail on Operation (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
  • 0.75% fail on Road Wheels (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.43% fail on Attachment
    • 0.32% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
  • 0.54% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.54% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.32% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (82% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.21% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.11% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.11% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.11% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.11% fail on Anchorages