MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » FIAT » Fiorino » 2010
Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

FIAT Fiorino MOT Results

Registered in 2010
58.1% pass rate
from 852 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Fiorino is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 11% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 7.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.2% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.9% fail on Rear lamps
    • 4.8% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.0% fail on Stop lamp (35% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.2% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.82% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.23% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.1% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.23% fail on Switch (11 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.94% fail on Horn
    • 0.59% fail on Battery (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.12% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.12% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 18% fail on Suspension (35% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 9.2% fail on Coil springs (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 9.0% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Location
    • 5.3% fail on Shock absorbers (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 5.3% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.5% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.47% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.23% fail on Linkage condition
    • 1.6% fail on Macpherson strut (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.59% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.59% fail on Drive shafts (79% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Front drive shafts (79% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.59% fail on Constant velocity joints (79% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.12% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.12% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.12% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.12% fail on Attachment
    • 0.12% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.12% fail on Front
  • 9.7% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.4% fail on Washers (74% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.8% fail on Wipers
    • 1.2% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.47% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.12% fail on Bonnet
  • 9.6% fail on Tyres (55% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 6.0% fail on Tread depth (63% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.23% fail on Size/type
    • 0.12% fail on Valve stem
  • 6.5% fail on Brakes (45% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Service brake control components (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Pedal (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 2.0% fail on Anti-slip (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Hub components (60% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Brake pads (54% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.47% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.6% fail on ABS (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Brake performance (78% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Parking brake performance (83% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.47% fail on Rear wheels (80% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.12% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 0.94% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.94% fail on Condition
    • 0.23% fail on Hydraulic systems (92% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Components (91% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.23% fail on Hoses
    • 0.12% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.12% fail on Lever
  • 1.9% fail on Steering (50% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Power steering (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Operation (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Other components
      • 0.12% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.35% fail on Steering system (89% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Track rod end (91% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.12% fail on Steering operation
  • 0.82% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 0.47% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.35% fail on Cap
      • 0.12% fail on Tank
    • 0.23% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.12% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 0.70% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.59% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.59% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
    • 0.12% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.12% fail on Condition
  • 0.70% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.70% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.59% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.23% fail on Spare wheel
    • 0.12% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.12% fail on Body condition
    • 0.12% fail on Seats
      • 0.12% fail on Drivers