FIAT Fiorino MOT Results
Registered in 201058.1% pass rate
from 852 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Fiorino is unusually good or bad.
-
23% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 11% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
7.6% fail on
Position lamps
- 6.2% fail on Front lamps
- 1.9% fail on Rear lamps
- 4.8% fail on Headlamp aim
- 4.0% fail on Stop lamp (35% better than other 2010 vans)
-
2.2% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.2% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.2% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.82% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.23% fail on All direction indicators
-
2.2% fail on
Flashing type
-
2.1% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.1% fail on Headlamp
-
1.1% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.1% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.23% fail on Switch (11 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.94% fail on Horn
- 0.59% fail on Battery (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.12% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.12% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
18% fail on
Suspension
(35% worse than other 2010 vans)
-
9.2% fail on
Coil springs
(3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 9.0% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.12% fail on Location
-
5.3% fail on
Shock absorbers
(3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 5.3% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
3.1% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.5% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.47% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.23% fail on Linkage condition
-
1.6% fail on
Macpherson strut
(3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 1.6% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
1.2% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.59% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.59% fail on
Drive shafts
(79% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.59% fail on
Front drive shafts
(79% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.59% fail on Constant velocity joints (79% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.59% fail on
Front drive shafts
(79% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.12% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.12% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.12% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.12% fail on Attachment
-
0.12% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.12% fail on Front
-
9.2% fail on
Coil springs
(3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
9.7% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 5.4% fail on Washers (74% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 4.8% fail on Wipers
- 1.2% fail on Windscreen
- 0.47% fail on Mirrors
- 0.12% fail on Bonnet
-
9.6% fail on
Tyres
(55% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 6.0% fail on Tread depth (63% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 4.1% fail on Condition
- 0.23% fail on Size/type
- 0.12% fail on Valve stem
-
6.5% fail on
Brakes
(45% better than other 2010 vans)
-
2.0% fail on
Service brake control components
(2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
2.0% fail on
Pedal
(2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 2.0% fail on Anti-slip (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
2.0% fail on
Pedal
(2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
1.8% fail on
Hub components
(60% better than other 2010 vans)
- 1.6% fail on Brake pads (54% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.47% fail on Brake discs
- 1.6% fail on ABS (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
1.2% fail on
Brake performance
(78% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.59% fail on Parking brake performance (83% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.47% fail on Rear wheels (80% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.35% fail on Front wheels
- 0.12% fail on Brake imbalance
-
0.94% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.94% fail on Condition
-
0.23% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(92% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.23% fail on
Components
(91% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.23% fail on Hoses
-
0.23% fail on
Components
(91% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.12% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.12% fail on Lever
-
2.0% fail on
Service brake control components
(2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
1.9% fail on
Steering
(50% better than other 2010 vans)
-
1.4% fail on
Power steering
(2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Operation (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.23% fail on Other components
- 0.12% fail on Pipes and hoses
-
0.35% fail on
Steering system
(89% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.23% fail on Track rod end (91% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.12% fail on Steering rack
- 0.12% fail on Steering operation
-
1.4% fail on
Power steering
(2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
0.82% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
-
0.47% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.35% fail on Cap
- 0.12% fail on Tank
- 0.23% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.12% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.47% fail on
Fuel system
-
0.70% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
0.59% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.59% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
0.12% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.12% fail on Condition
-
0.59% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
-
0.70% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.70% fail on Registration plate
-
0.59% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 0.23% fail on Spare wheel
- 0.12% fail on Engine mountings
- 0.12% fail on Body condition
-
0.12% fail on
Seats
- 0.12% fail on Drivers