Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Ford Ranger MOT Results

Registered in 1999
53.5% pass rate
from 396 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 vans and highlighted areas where the Ford Ranger is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 12% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (190% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 12% fail on Rear fog lamp (190% worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 12% fail on Rear fog lamp (200% worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 0.25% fail on Switch
    • 7.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 7.1% fail on Headlamp (71% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 6.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 5.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.51% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 5.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.8% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.3% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.0% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.76% fail on Trailer electrical socket (5 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.51% fail on Horn (80% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.5% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.25% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.51% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.51% fail on Switch
    • 0.25% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.25% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.25% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 17% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 5.8% fail on Transmission
      • 5.3% fail on Drive shafts
        • 5.3% fail on Joints
      • 0.51% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.51% fail on Joints
    • 4.8% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.5% fail on Chassis
      • 3.5% fail on Chassis condition
    • 2.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 2.3% fail on Fuel system (150% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Pipe (3 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.76% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.25% fail on Tank
    • 1.3% fail on Body
      • 0.51% fail on Body condition (7 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.51% fail on Other body component
      • 0.25% fail on Panel
    • 0.51% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.25% fail on Spare wheel condition
      • 0.25% fail on Carrier
    • 0.51% fail on Floor
    • 0.51% fail on Cabs
      • 0.51% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.25% fail on Seats
      • 0.25% fail on Driver's seat
  • 16% fail on Brakes
    • 7.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes (73% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 5.3% fail on Brake performance (49% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 3.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.5% fail on Rbt
          • 2.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.25% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.25% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.76% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (84% better than other 1999 vans)
        • 0.76% fail on Rbt (sp) (83% better than other 1999 vans)
          • 0.51% fail on Service brake imbalance (81% better than other 1999 vans)
          • 0.25% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.76% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (81% better than other 1999 vans)
        • 0.76% fail on Rbt (sp) (81% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.51% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.5% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 2.0% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 1.0% fail on Other braking system component (10 times worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 0.51% fail on Actuating linkage mounting (14 times worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 0.25% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
        • 0.25% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
    • 1.5% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.25% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.25% fail on Cable
    • 1.0% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (4 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (9 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.25% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.25% fail on Brake fluid
  • 14% fail on Suspension
    • 5.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.5% fail on Ball joint dust cover (150% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 3.0% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.51% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 5.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.5% fail on Linkage (4 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.25% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.25% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.25% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.5% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.5% fail on Springs
      • 1.0% fail on Leaf springs
        • 1.0% fail on Leaf spring
        • 0.25% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
      • 0.51% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.25% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.25% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.25% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.25% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.25% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 8.3% fail on Visibility
    • 5.1% fail on Washers
    • 4.0% fail on Wipers
    • 0.51% fail on View to rear
      • 0.51% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.25% fail on Bonnet
  • 5.8% fail on Steering
    • 5.6% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 5.1% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.25% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.25% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.25% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.25% fail on Flexible coupling
  • 5.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.8% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.5% fail on Compression ignition
        • 2.5% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (2 times worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 1.0% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 1.0% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.25% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.25% fail on Other emission control equipment
      • 0.25% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.25% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.25% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.25% fail on Undertray
  • 4.5% fail on Tyres
    • 3.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.25% fail on Size/type
  • 2.0% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 2.0% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.76% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (82% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.51% fail on Seat belts (87% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.51% fail on Condition
    • 0.25% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp