Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Ford Ranger MOT Results

Registered in 1999
52.6% pass rate
from 460 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 vans and highlighted areas where the Ford Ranger is unusually good or bad.

  • 28% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 12% fail on Rear fog lamp (170% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 12% fail on Fog lamp (180% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 6.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 6.7% fail on Headlamp (60% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 6.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.9% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 5.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.8% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.8% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.43% fail on All position lamps
    • 5.7% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.1% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.65% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.22% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.22% fail on Switch
    • 1.5% fail on Battery
    • 0.65% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.43% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.22% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.22% fail on Horn
  • 21% fail on Suspension
    • 6.5% fail on Prescribed areas (40% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 3.7% fail on Component mounting (49% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 3.5% fail on Spring mounting
    • 4.8% fail on Drive shafts
      • 4.8% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 4.8% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 4.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 3.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.0% fail on Linkage condition (4 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.43% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 2.6% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 2.6% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.6% fail on Condition
    • 2.4% fail on Leaf springs (120% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Pins and bushes
        • 0.22% fail on Shackle
    • 0.87% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.87% fail on Front
    • 0.22% fail on General condition
  • 18% fail on Brakes
    • 12% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 11% fail on Components
        • 7.0% fail on Pipes
        • 5.0% fail on Valves (110% worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 0.22% fail on Hoses
        • 0.22% fail on Reservoirs
      • 1.1% fail on Leaks
      • 0.43% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 8.3% fail on Brake performance (33% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 4.1% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.5% fail on Rear wheels (70% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance (73% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Brake performance not tested (3 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance (65% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.43% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.43% fail on Brake operation (5 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Hub components
      • 1.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.22% fail on Brake calipers
    • 0.43% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.43% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.22% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
      • 0.22% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
    • 0.22% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.22% fail on Cable
  • 8.5% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.9% fail on Washers
    • 4.6% fail on Wipers
    • 0.22% fail on Mirrors
  • 8.0% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 5.2% fail on Body condition
    • 3.0% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 3.0% fail on Chassis
    • 0.43% fail on Doors
      • 0.22% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.22% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.22% fail on Seats
      • 0.22% fail on Drivers
  • 7.6% fail on Tyres
    • 5.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.6% fail on Condition
  • 5.9% fail on Steering
    • 4.6% fail on Steering system
      • 3.7% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.87% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.22% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.22% fail on Other components
        • 0.22% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 0.87% fail on Power steering
      • 0.87% fail on Pipes and hoses (3 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Operation
    • 0.22% fail on Steering control
      • 0.22% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.22% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 5.9% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 3.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.7% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.87% fail on Cap
      • 0.65% fail on Tank
      • 0.22% fail on System
    • 0.87% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.43% fail on Emissions
  • 2.6% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 2.6% fail on Registration plate
  • 1.3% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (75% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.87% fail on Seat belts (83% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.65% fail on Prescribed areas (84% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.43% fail on Condition
    • 0.43% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.43% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp