Ford Ranger MOT Results

Registered in 2000
57.0% pass rate
from 710 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the Ford Ranger is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 10% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (140% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 10% fail on Rear fog lamp (140% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 10% fail on Rear fog lamp (140% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 9.0% fail on Headlamps (100% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 7.3% fail on Headlamp (86% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp levelling device (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Dipswitch
    • 7.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 6.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.56% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.5% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.70% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.56% fail on Trailer electrical socket (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.42% fail on Horn (79% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.1% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.70% fail on Direction indicators (81% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.70% fail on Flashing type (81% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.56% fail on Individual direction indicators (78% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.14% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.14% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.14% fail on Switch
    • 0.14% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.14% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.14% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 15% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 5.1% fail on Transmission
      • 4.9% fail on Drive shafts (59% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 4.6% fail on Joints
        • 0.28% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.14% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.14% fail on Joints
    • 4.5% fail on Chassis
      • 4.5% fail on Chassis condition
    • 3.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 3.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 2.3% fail on Body (120% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.85% fail on Mounting fixings (7 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.70% fail on Panel
      • 0.42% fail on Body condition (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.42% fail on Other body component
    • 1.3% fail on Cabs (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.99% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.56% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.42% fail on Pipe
    • 0.56% fail on Towbar (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Other towbar components
      • 0.14% fail on Towbar condition
      • 0.14% fail on Safety device
    • 0.56% fail on Floor (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.28% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.14% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.14% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.14% fail on Doors
      • 0.14% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.14% fail on Door condition
    • 0.14% fail on Seats
      • 0.14% fail on Driver's seat
  • 13% fail on Suspension (33% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (48% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint (59% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Springs
      • 1.7% fail on Leaf springs (120% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.85% fail on Leaf spring
        • 0.42% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
        • 0.28% fail on Anchor bracket
        • 0.28% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
      • 0.70% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.99% fail on Linkage (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.42% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.28% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.28% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.14% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.14% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.85% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.85% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.42% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.28% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint
  • 12% fail on Brakes (32% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 4.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 4.4% fail on Brake performance (64% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 3.2% fail on Service brake performance (41% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 3.2% fail on Rbt (40% better than other 2000 vans)
          • 2.8% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.99% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.85% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (86% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.85% fail on Rbt (sp) (86% better than other 2000 vans)
          • 0.56% fail on Service brake imbalance (82% better than other 2000 vans)
          • 0.28% fail on Service brake performance (92% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.70% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.42% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (91% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.28% fail on Rbt (sp) (94% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.14% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.14% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.14% fail on Rbt
          • 0.14% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 4.2% fail on Load sensing valves (93% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.1% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.42% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.42% fail on Cable
      • 0.14% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.14% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.1% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (160% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.99% fail on Prescribed areas (180% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.56% fail on Other braking system component
        • 0.28% fail on Actuating linkage mounting (9 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.14% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
      • 0.14% fail on Other components
    • 0.28% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.14% fail on Master cylinder
      • 0.14% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.28% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.28% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.14% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.14% fail on Pedal
    • 0.14% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.14% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.14% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 9.2% fail on Visibility
    • 4.9% fail on Wipers
    • 4.8% fail on Washers
    • 0.70% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.70% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.14% fail on View to rear
      • 0.14% fail on Mirrors
  • 5.1% fail on Tyres
    • 3.8% fail on Tread depth (68% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Condition
  • 3.9% fail on Steering (42% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.4% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.70% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.28% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.14% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.28% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.28% fail on Steering play
      • 0.14% fail on Steering box
      • 0.14% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.14% fail on Power steering
      • 0.14% fail on Operation
  • 3.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.4% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.4% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.3% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.99% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.85% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.14% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.14% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.14% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.14% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
  • 1.7% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plates
  • 1.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (60% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Seat belts (59% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
      • 0.42% fail on Prescribed areas (85% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.14% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.70% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.70% fail on Attachment
  • 0.14% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.14% fail on Speedometer