Ford Ranger MOT Results

Registered in 2000
54.2% pass rate
from 928 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the Ford Ranger is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 11% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (150% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 11% fail on Rear fog lamp (150% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 11% fail on Rear fog lamp (150% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Front fog lamps
        • 0.11% fail on Front fog lamp switch
    • 7.9% fail on Headlamps (82% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 6.8% fail on Headlamp (80% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp levelling device (140% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 5.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.22% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.9% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.7% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.22% fail on All position lamps
    • 2.0% fail on Electrical equipment (48% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.54% fail on Horn (80% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.43% fail on Trailer electrical socket (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.97% fail on Direction indicators (70% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.97% fail on Flashing type (70% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.65% fail on Individual direction indicators (71% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.32% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.22% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.11% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.11% fail on Switch
  • 15% fail on Suspension (22% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 5.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.9% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 1.6% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.6% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.22% fail on Suspension arm
    • 5.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (45% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.9% fail on Springs
      • 2.3% fail on Leaf springs (130% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Leaf spring (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.43% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
        • 0.11% fail on Anchor bracket
      • 0.65% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.6% fail on Linkage (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.32% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.22% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.6% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.86% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.65% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.54% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.54% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.54% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.11% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.11% fail on Suspension rod
  • 15% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 5.8% fail on Transmission
      • 5.5% fail on Drive shafts (69% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 5.4% fail on Joints (69% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.11% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.32% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.32% fail on Joints
    • 4.2% fail on Chassis
      • 4.2% fail on Chassis condition
    • 3.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 3.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 2.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.1% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.54% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.43% fail on Pipe
      • 0.11% fail on Tank
    • 1.1% fail on Body
      • 0.43% fail on Other body component
      • 0.32% fail on Mounting fixings
      • 0.22% fail on Panel
      • 0.11% fail on Body condition
    • 0.54% fail on Cabs
      • 0.54% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.22% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.22% fail on Towbar
      • 0.11% fail on Towbar condition
      • 0.11% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.22% fail on Floor
    • 0.11% fail on Seats
      • 0.11% fail on Driver's seat
  • 15% fail on Brakes (19% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 6.8% fail on Brake performance (41% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 5.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.8% fail on Rbt
          • 4.4% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.86% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.32% fail on Decelerometer (11 times worse than other 2000 vans)
          • 0.32% fail on Service brake performance (11 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (80% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (80% better than other 2000 vans)
          • 0.65% fail on Service brake performance (81% better than other 2000 vans)
          • 0.43% fail on Service brake imbalance (85% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.75% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (84% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.65% fail on Rbt (sp) (86% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.11% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.65% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.32% fail on Parking brake performance (78% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.32% fail on Rbt (77% better than other 2000 vans)
          • 0.22% fail on Parking brake performance (82% better than other 2000 vans)
          • 0.11% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 6.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 4.0% fail on Load sensing valves (88% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Mechanical brake components (51% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.2% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.22% fail on Brake discs and drums (80% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.22% fail on Brake discs (80% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.11% fail on Cable
    • 0.54% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.54% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.32% fail on Other braking system component
        • 0.22% fail on Actuating linkage mounting (11 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.11% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
    • 0.43% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.32% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.11% fail on Valves
    • 0.22% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.22% fail on Pedal
  • 9.8% fail on Visibility
    • 5.3% fail on Washers
    • 4.1% fail on Wipers
    • 0.75% fail on View to rear
      • 0.75% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.43% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.43% fail on Windscreen
  • 5.3% fail on Tyres
    • 3.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.32% fail on Size/type
  • 3.7% fail on Steering (46% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.7% fail on Track rod end (51% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.97% fail on Ball joint (190% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Locking devices (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.43% fail on Power steering
      • 0.43% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.22% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.11% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.11% fail on Steering box
    • 0.11% fail on Steering play
      • 0.11% fail on Steering box
  • 3.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.2% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.2% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.8% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.32% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.43% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.43% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.11% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 2.3% fail on Identification of the vehicle (140% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Registration plates (140% worse than other 2000 vans)
  • 1.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (73% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Seat belts (75% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Prescribed areas (84% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Condition
    • 0.22% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.22% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.22% fail on Attachment
  • 0.11% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.11% fail on Anchorages