Ford Ranger MOT Results

Registered in 2000
53.8% pass rate
from 1,117 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the Ford Ranger is unusually good or bad.

  • 30% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 11% fail on Rear fog lamp (160% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 11% fail on Fog lamp (170% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.090% fail on Switch
    • 7.3% fail on Headlamps (84% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 7.2% fail on Headlamp (84% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest (10 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.18% fail on Headlamp levelling device (19 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.090% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
      • 0.090% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.090% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
      • 0.090% fail on Switch
    • 6.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.5% fail on Front lamps
      • 3.2% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.18% fail on All position lamps
    • 6.7% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 6.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.1% fail on Individual lamps (56% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.27% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.3% fail on Battery
    • 0.90% fail on Horn (68% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.54% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.18% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.18% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.090% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 21% fail on Suspension
    • 7.5% fail on Prescribed areas (31% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 4.3% fail on Spring mounting
      • 3.9% fail on Component mounting (42% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.63% fail on Subframe mounting (71% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 6.4% fail on Drive shafts (81% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 6.4% fail on Front drive shafts (84% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 6.4% fail on Constant velocity joints (84% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.090% fail on Drive shafts
    • 3.3% fail on Leaf springs (170% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.81% fail on Pins and bushes
        • 0.72% fail on Shackle
        • 0.090% fail on Anchor
      • 0.090% fail on Spring eye
      • 0.090% fail on Securing bolts
    • 2.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.090% fail on Attachment
    • 2.1% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.1% fail on Condition
    • 1.9% fail on Anti-roll bars (48% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage condition (150% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.18% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (91% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.090% fail on Condition
      • 0.090% fail on Attachment
    • 1.6% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.6% fail on Front
    • 1.5% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.090% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 15% fail on Brakes (28% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 9.9% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 9.6% fail on Components
        • 5.9% fail on Pipes
        • 4.1% fail on Valves
        • 0.45% fail on Hoses (78% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.18% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.63% fail on Leaks
      • 0.36% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.090% fail on Operation
    • 6.7% fail on Brake performance (48% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 3.5% fail on Front wheels
      • 2.1% fail on Rear wheels (62% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.98% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.81% fail on Brake performance not tested (190% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Service brake performance (85% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Parking brake performance (90% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.090% fail on Brake operation
    • 1.6% fail on Hub components
      • 1.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.27% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.090% fail on Brake linings
    • 0.54% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.36% fail on Actuating linkage mounting (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.090% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
      • 0.090% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
    • 0.27% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.27% fail on Pedal
        • 0.18% fail on Condition
        • 0.090% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.27% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.27% fail on Cable
    • 0.18% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.090% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.090% fail on Condition
  • 10% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.8% fail on Wipers
    • 4.4% fail on Washers
    • 0.72% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.090% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.090% fail on Mirrors
  • 6.8% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 4.0% fail on Body condition
    • 3.0% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 3.0% fail on Chassis
    • 0.18% fail on Doors (82% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.090% fail on Drivers
      • 0.090% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.090% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.090% fail on Seats
      • 0.090% fail on Passengers
    • 0.090% fail on Load security
      • 0.090% fail on Bootlid
  • 6.2% fail on Tyres
    • 4.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.5% fail on Condition (55% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.36% fail on Size/type
    • 0.27% fail on Valve stem
  • 5.1% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (41% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.81% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.54% fail on Cap
      • 0.18% fail on Pipe
      • 0.090% fail on System
    • 0.72% fail on Emissions (60% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.54% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 3.0% fail on Steering (61% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Steering system (65% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Track rod end (63% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.45% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.090% fail on Free play
        • 0.090% fail on Steering box
      • 0.090% fail on Steering box
      • 0.090% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.090% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.54% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Power steering (80% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.090% fail on Operation
      • 0.090% fail on Other components
  • 2.1% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 2.1% fail on Registration plate
  • 1.7% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (70% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Seat belts (71% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
      • 0.27% fail on Prescribed areas (93% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.090% fail on Requirements
    • 0.18% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.18% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 0.72% fail on Towbars
    • 0.54% fail on Towbar (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Vehicle structure
  • 0.54% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.54% fail on Attachment