Ford Ranger MOT Results

Registered in 2000
54.9% pass rate
from 751 tests in 2020
(0.039% better than other 2000 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the Ford Ranger is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (16% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 9.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (130% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 9.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (130% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 9.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (130% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Switch
    • 8.8% fail on Headlamps (110% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 7.9% fail on Headlamp (110% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp levelling device (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 5.5% fail on Stop lamp (10% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim (6.0% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim (8.6% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.53% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (52% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (37% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Direction indicators (44% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Flashing type (44% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Individual direction indicators (49% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.40% fail on Side repeaters (53% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.27% fail on All direction indicators (18% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Electrical equipment (50% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.93% fail on Battery(ies) (0.028% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.67% fail on Horn (75% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Trailer electrical socket (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Position lamps (170% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Position lamp (180% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.27% fail on Rear reflectors (28% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.13% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.13% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 16% fail on Body, chassis, structure (6.0% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 5.1% fail on Transmission (28% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 4.8% fail on Drive shafts (59% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 4.8% fail on Joints (62% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Prop shafts (73% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Prop shaft
        • 0.13% fail on Joints
    • 4.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure (22% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 4.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (24% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Exhaust system (9.0% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Chassis (13% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 3.3% fail on Chassis condition (15% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Fuel system (51% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.53% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (73% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Tank (81% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Pipe (62% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Body (5.0% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.53% fail on Panel (20% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Mounting fixings (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Body condition
      • 0.13% fail on Other body component
    • 0.80% fail on Cabs (130% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.80% fail on Prescribed areas (160% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 0.40% fail on Bumpers (51% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.27% fail on Spare wheel (180% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Spare wheel condition (7 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.13% fail on Towbar
      • 0.13% fail on Safety device
    • 0.13% fail on Load security
      • 0.13% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.13% fail on Tailgate condition
    • 0.13% fail on Doors
      • 0.13% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.13% fail on Door condition
    • 0.13% fail on Floor
    • 0.13% fail on Seats
      • 0.13% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.13% fail on Undertray
  • 14% fail on Brakes (17% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 6.4% fail on Brake performance (43% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 4.5% fail on Service brake performance (9.6% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 4.3% fail on Rbt (12% better than other 2000 vans)
          • 3.6% fail on Service brake performance (7.8% better than other 2000 vans)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance (25% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.13% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.13% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.13% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (79% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (79% better than other 2000 vans)
          • 0.93% fail on Service brake imbalance (67% better than other 2000 vans)
          • 0.53% fail on Service brake performance (83% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.93% fail on Brake performance not tested (82% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.67% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (85% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.67% fail on Rbt (sp) (84% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.53% fail on Parking brake performance (63% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.40% fail on Rbt (72% better than other 2000 vans)
          • 0.40% fail on Parking brake performance (68% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.13% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
    • 5.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes (24% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Load sensing valves (95% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Mechanical brake components (45% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Brake linings and pads (0.25% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Brake pads (1.4% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (65% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Rod
        • 0.13% fail on Cable
      • 0.13% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.13% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.53% fail on Hydraulic systems (58% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Master cylinder
      • 0.13% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.13% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.13% fail on Valves
    • 0.40% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (21% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Prescribed areas (38% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.40% fail on Other braking system component (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.27% fail on Flexible brake hoses (51% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.27% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (25% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (92% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.13% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.13% fail on Pedal
    • 0.13% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.13% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 12% fail on Suspension (34% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (47% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Suspension arms (46% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint (45% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover (3.3% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.53% fail on Pins and bushes (44% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Anti-roll bars (33% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Pins and bushes (62% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (78% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.13% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 2.1% fail on Springs (11% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Leaf springs (67% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.93% fail on Leaf spring (200% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.27% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (12% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
      • 0.80% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (0.73% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Wheel bearings (0.36% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.53% fail on Shock absorbers (51% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.53% fail on Other suspension component (37% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Ball joint (22% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.13% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.13% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 9.6% fail on Visibility (2.4% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 5.1% fail on Wipers (2.1% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Washers (2.2% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.40% fail on Condition of glass (46% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Windscreen (56% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.13% fail on View to rear
      • 0.13% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.5% fail on Tyres (7.8% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 3.2% fail on Tread depth (14% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Condition (25% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.40% fail on Size/type (32% worse than other 2000 vans)
  • 3.9% fail on Steering (39% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Steering linkage components (18% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Track rod end (32% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.67% fail on Ball joint (130% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Intermediate drop arm
      • 0.13% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.13% fail on Lock stop
    • 0.53% fail on Power steering (26% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.53% fail on Pipes and hoses (130% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.27% fail on Prescribed areas (140% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.13% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.13% fail on Steering box
    • 0.13% fail on Steering play
      • 0.13% fail on Steering box
  • 3.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (22% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 3.6% fail on Exhaust emissions (9.2% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 3.3% fail on Compression ignition (23% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.9% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.80% fail on Emissions not tested (4.7% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.67% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (54% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Spark ignition (69% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.27% fail on Emissions not tested (16% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.13% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.13% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 1.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (61% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Seat belts (70% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.67% fail on Condition (23% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Prescribed areas (85% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Attachment
    • 0.53% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (6.9% worse than other 2000 vans)
  • 1.3% fail on Identification of the vehicle (55% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plates (59% worse than other 2000 vans)
  • 0.40% fail on Road Wheels (92% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.40% fail on Attachment (140% worse than other 2000 vans)