MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Ford » Ranger » 2002
Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Ford Ranger MOT Results

Registered in 2002
53.3% pass rate
from 1,719 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the Ford Ranger is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 10% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (180% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 10% fail on Rear fog lamp (180% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 10% fail on Rear fog lamp (190% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.23% fail on Switch
    • 7.3% fail on Headlamp aim (44% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 6.6% fail on Headlamp aim (40% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.70% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 6.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.0% fail on Headlamp
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp levelling device (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 4.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.7% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.12% fail on All position lamps
    • 2.7% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.3% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.93% fail on Horn (59% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.47% fail on Trailer electrical socket (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 2.0% fail on Direction indicators (47% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Flashing type (47% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.29% fail on Side repeaters (75% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.058% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (55% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.35% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.35% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.17% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.17% fail on Switch
    • 0.12% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 20% fail on Body, chassis, structure (27% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 9.5% fail on Transmission (89% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 8.7% fail on Drive shafts (130% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 8.6% fail on Joints (130% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.17% fail on Drive shaft
      • 1.2% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.93% fail on Joints (200% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.17% fail on Prop shaft (75% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.058% fail on Bearing housing
    • 4.9% fail on Chassis (64% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 4.9% fail on Chassis condition (64% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.058% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 3.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.2% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.47% fail on Pipe
      • 0.47% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.12% fail on Tank
      • 0.12% fail on Hose
    • 0.87% fail on Body
      • 0.41% fail on Panel
      • 0.29% fail on Other body component
      • 0.17% fail on Mounting fixings
      • 0.058% fail on Body condition
    • 0.64% fail on Towbar
      • 0.41% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.17% fail on Other towbar components
      • 0.058% fail on Towbar condition
    • 0.29% fail on Floor
    • 0.29% fail on Cabs
      • 0.29% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.23% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.12% fail on Spare wheel condition
      • 0.12% fail on Carrier
    • 0.17% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.12% fail on Load security
      • 0.12% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.058% fail on Tailgate condition
        • 0.058% fail on Other tailgate component
    • 0.12% fail on Doors (88% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.058% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.058% fail on Hinge
      • 0.058% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.058% fail on Door condition
    • 0.058% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.058% fail on Engine mounting condition
  • 17% fail on Brakes (17% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 7.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes (38% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 5.6% fail on Brake performance (55% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 4.5% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.2% fail on Rbt
          • 3.8% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.87% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.23% fail on Decelerometer (7 times worse than other 2002 vans)
          • 0.23% fail on Service brake performance (7 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.058% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.058% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.99% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (82% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.87% fail on Rbt (sp) (84% better than other 2002 vans)
          • 0.52% fail on Service brake imbalance (82% better than other 2002 vans)
          • 0.35% fail on Service brake performance (89% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.87% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (85% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.87% fail on Rbt (sp) (85% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.29% fail on Parking brake performance (86% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.29% fail on Rbt (85% better than other 2002 vans)
          • 0.29% fail on Parking brake performance (83% better than other 2002 vans)
          • 0.058% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 4.1% fail on Load sensing valves (54% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.0% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.29% fail on Brake discs and drums (78% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.29% fail on Brake discs (77% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.058% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.058% fail on Cable
    • 0.58% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.29% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.17% fail on Valves
      • 0.12% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.29% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.23% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.23% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.23% fail on Other braking system component
    • 0.12% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (83% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Pedal
    • 0.12% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.058% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
      • 0.058% fail on Servos
    • 0.12% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.12% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.058% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.058% fail on Lever
  • 14% fail on Suspension (32% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (44% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Suspension arms (48% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.87% fail on Ball joint (74% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.76% fail on Ball joint dust cover (49% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.058% fail on Suspension arm
    • 3.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.76% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.12% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.12% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.058% fail on Anti-roll bar
    • 3.0% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 2.9% fail on Springs
      • 2.2% fail on Leaf springs (120% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Leaf spring (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.52% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
        • 0.058% fail on Anchor bracket
        • 0.058% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
        • 0.058% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
      • 0.87% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.93% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.29% fail on Other suspension component (70% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.058% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.17% fail on Sub-frames (81% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (84% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.058% fail on Sub-frame
  • 8.6% fail on Visibility (20% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Washers
    • 4.0% fail on Wipers (29% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.41% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.41% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.35% fail on View to rear (65% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Mirrors (70% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.058% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.12% fail on Driver's view
  • 6.2% fail on Tyres
    • 4.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.29% fail on Size/type
  • 3.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (30% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.4% fail on Compression ignition
        • 2.0% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.17% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.12% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 0.17% fail on Spark ignition (80% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.058% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.35% fail on Fluid leaks (71% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Engine oil leaks (82% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Other leaks
  • 3.6% fail on Steering (48% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Steering linkage components (50% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Track rod end (74% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.81% fail on Ball joint (160% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Locking devices (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.12% fail on Intermediate drop arm
      • 0.058% fail on Other components
        • 0.058% fail on Steering linkage
    • 0.58% fail on Prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.35% fail on Power steering
      • 0.29% fail on Other components
      • 0.058% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.29% fail on Steering gear (79% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Steering box (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.058% fail on Operation
    • 0.23% fail on Steering play
      • 0.23% fail on Steering box (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
  • 1.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (61% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Seat belts (54% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
      • 0.47% fail on Prescribed areas (82% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.23% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (81% better than other 2002 vans)
  • 1.5% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.058% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.058% fail on Speedometer
  • 0.058% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.058% fail on Attachment