MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Ford » Ranger » 2002

Ford Ranger MOT Results

Registered in 2002
53.4% pass rate
from 1,259 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the Ford Ranger is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 9.5% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (160% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 9.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (160% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 9.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (160% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.079% fail on Switch
    • 6.6% fail on Headlamp aim (42% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 6.1% fail on Headlamp aim (42% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.48% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 5.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.1% fail on Headlamp
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp levelling device (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.079% fail on Dipswitch
    • 4.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.1% fail on Direction indicators (71% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Flashing type (71% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.71% fail on Individual direction indicators (73% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.32% fail on Side repeaters (73% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.079% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.079% fail on Switch
    • 1.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.0% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.0% fail on Electrical equipment (57% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.48% fail on Horn (70% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.24% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.079% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.24% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.24% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 0.16% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.16% fail on Switch
    • 0.079% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 19% fail on Body, chassis, structure (28% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 8.0% fail on Transmission (64% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 7.5% fail on Drive shafts (100% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 7.5% fail on Joints (100% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.079% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.48% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.40% fail on Joints
        • 0.079% fail on Prop shaft
    • 4.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 4.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 3.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.6% fail on Chassis
      • 3.3% fail on Chassis condition
      • 0.24% fail on Strengthening plate (7 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.95% fail on Cabs (140% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.95% fail on Prescribed areas (160% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.87% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.40% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.24% fail on Pipe
      • 0.16% fail on Tank
      • 0.079% fail on System
    • 0.79% fail on Body
      • 0.56% fail on Panel
      • 0.16% fail on Other body component
      • 0.079% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 0.48% fail on Floor (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.40% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.40% fail on Spare wheel (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Spare wheel condition (9 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.24% fail on Seats
      • 0.16% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.079% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.079% fail on Doors
      • 0.079% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.079% fail on Door condition
  • 16% fail on Suspension (21% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 5.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (29% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.0% fail on Linkage (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.71% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.40% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.16% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.16% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.079% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.079% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.1% fail on Springs
      • 2.5% fail on Leaf springs (160% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 2.1% fail on Leaf spring (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.32% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
        • 0.079% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
      • 0.64% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.9% fail on Suspension arms (51% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint (65% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.56% fail on Ball joint dust cover (61% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Suspension arm
    • 2.8% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.48% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.32% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.24% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.079% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.24% fail on Sub-frames (76% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (79% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.079% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.079% fail on Axles
      • 0.079% fail on Axle
    • 0.079% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.079% fail on Suspension rod
  • 14% fail on Brakes (26% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 6.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes (33% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 5.6% fail on Brake performance (55% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.6% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.3% fail on Rbt
          • 2.8% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.71% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.16% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.16% fail on Service brake performance (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.079% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.079% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (76% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (79% better than other 2002 vans)
          • 0.71% fail on Service brake performance (78% better than other 2002 vans)
          • 0.56% fail on Service brake imbalance (80% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.16% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (8 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (82% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.95% fail on Rbt (sp) (83% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.079% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.87% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.32% fail on Parking brake performance (83% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.32% fail on Rbt (82% better than other 2002 vans)
          • 0.32% fail on Parking brake performance (79% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.9% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 1.4% fail on Mechanical brake components (55% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.1% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.079% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.079% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.079% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.079% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.079% fail on Cable
    • 0.64% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.48% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.32% fail on Other braking system component
        • 0.16% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
      • 0.16% fail on Other components
    • 0.40% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.16% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.16% fail on Valves
      • 0.079% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.32% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.32% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.24% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.079% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.24% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.16% fail on Pedal
      • 0.079% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.079% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.079% fail on Lever
  • 8.3% fail on Visibility
    • 4.4% fail on Wipers
    • 4.4% fail on Washers
    • 0.40% fail on View to rear
      • 0.40% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.16% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.16% fail on Windscreen
  • 4.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.3% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.3% fail on Compression ignition
        • 2.3% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.95% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.079% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.079% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.079% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
    • 0.87% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.64% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.16% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.079% fail on Other leaks
  • 3.8% fail on Tyres
    • 2.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.5% fail on Condition
  • 2.8% fail on Steering (58% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Steering linkage components (38% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Track rod end (71% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.87% fail on Ball joint (180% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.56% fail on Drag link end (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Locking devices (7 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.079% fail on Intermediate drop arm
      • 0.079% fail on Other components
        • 0.079% fail on Steering linkage
    • 0.079% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.079% fail on Steering wheel
  • 1.7% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plates
  • 1.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (61% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Seat belts (56% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
      • 0.16% fail on Requirements
      • 0.079% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.40% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (67% better than other 2002 vans)
  • 0.64% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.64% fail on Attachment