Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Ford Ranger MOT Results

Registered in 2002
50.6% pass rate
from 2,005 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the Ford Ranger is unusually good or bad.

  • 28% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (11% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 12% fail on Rear fog lamp (180% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 11% fail on Fog lamp (180% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.050% fail on Switch
    • 7.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.8% fail on Front lamps
      • 3.0% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.25% fail on All position lamps
    • 7.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 5.7% fail on Stop lamp (21% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Registration plate lamp (58% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.9% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.050% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.050% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.5% fail on Direction indicators (63% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Flashing type (63% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Individual lamps (59% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.35% fail on Side repeaters (71% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.20% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.4% fail on Battery
    • 0.70% fail on Horn (72% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.55% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.50% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.25% fail on Lamp
      • 0.15% fail on Switch
      • 0.100% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.35% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.15% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.100% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 24% fail on Suspension
    • 9.1% fail on Drive shafts (98% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 9.1% fail on Front drive shafts (100% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 9.1% fail on Constant velocity joints (100% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.050% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.050% fail on Universal joint
    • 5.7% fail on Prescribed areas (33% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.3% fail on Spring mounting
      • 3.1% fail on Component mounting (37% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Subframe mounting (75% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Shock absorbers (150% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 4.6% fail on Condition (150% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Leaf springs (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes (180% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.85% fail on Shackle (140% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.45% fail on Anchor (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.050% fail on Other pins and bushes
      • 0.15% fail on Securing bolts
      • 0.100% fail on Anchor bracket
      • 0.050% fail on Spring slippers
    • 3.2% fail on Anti-roll bars (33% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Linkage condition (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.85% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (71% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Attachment
      • 0.30% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (78% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.050% fail on Condition
    • 2.4% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 2.2% fail on Front
      • 0.15% fail on Rear (78% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Suspension arms (56% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (57% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.100% fail on Attachment
      • 0.050% fail on Condition
    • 0.55% fail on Front suspension joints (79% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.050% fail on General condition
    • 0.050% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.050% fail on Condition
    • 0.050% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 19% fail on Brakes (13% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 13% fail on Hydraulic systems (26% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 13% fail on Components (27% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 9.5% fail on Pipes (53% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 3.6% fail on Valves
        • 1.2% fail on Hoses
        • 0.25% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.95% fail on Leaks (95% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.050% fail on Operation
    • 6.8% fail on Brake performance (48% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 4.0% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.5% fail on Rear wheels (74% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.90% fail on Service brake performance (71% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.75% fail on Parking brake performance (88% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.70% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.35% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.30% fail on Brake operation (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.050% fail on Parking brake operation
      • 0.050% fail on Gradient hand brake
    • 2.6% fail on Hub components
      • 2.2% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.40% fail on Brake discs (63% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.050% fail on Brake drums
    • 0.35% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.30% fail on Cable
      • 0.050% fail on Relay lever
    • 0.30% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.30% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.20% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
      • 0.100% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
    • 0.100% fail on Parking brake (93% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.100% fail on Condition (93% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.100% fail on ABS
    • 0.050% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.050% fail on Pedal
        • 0.050% fail on Anti-slip
  • 9.7% fail on Driver's view of the road (22% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 5.5% fail on Wipers
    • 4.3% fail on Washers
    • 0.85% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.20% fail on Mirrors (85% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.050% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.050% fail on Bonnet
  • 7.3% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 3.7% fail on Vehicle structure (61% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.7% fail on Chassis (61% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Body condition
    • 0.20% fail on Seats
      • 0.100% fail on Passengers
      • 0.100% fail on Drivers
    • 0.15% fail on Doors (87% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.050% fail on Drivers
      • 0.050% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.050% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.100% fail on Body security
    • 0.100% fail on Load security
      • 0.050% fail on Access panel
      • 0.050% fail on Tailgate
  • 6.8% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 4.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.4% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.50% fail on Pipe (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Cap
      • 0.30% fail on Tank
      • 0.25% fail on System
    • 1.00% fail on Emissions
    • 0.50% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 5.3% fail on Tyres (35% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.2% fail on Condition (63% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.20% fail on Size/type
    • 0.15% fail on Valve stem
  • 3.2% fail on Steering (58% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Steering system (65% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.90% fail on Track rod end (80% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.70% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.25% fail on Other components
        • 0.25% fail on Steering pivot point
      • 0.20% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.15% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.100% fail on Free play
        • 0.100% fail on Steering box
      • 0.100% fail on Steering box
      • 0.050% fail on Intermediate drop arm
    • 0.40% fail on Power steering
      • 0.15% fail on Operation
      • 0.15% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.050% fail on Drive system
      • 0.050% fail on Other components
    • 0.35% fail on Locking devices (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.25% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.050% fail on Steering control
      • 0.050% fail on Steering column
  • 2.0% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (63% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Seat belts (62% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Condition
      • 0.35% fail on Prescribed areas (89% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Requirements
    • 0.45% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (66% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.45% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (63% better than other 2002 vans)
  • 1.9% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.9% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.60% fail on Towbars
    • 0.35% fail on Towbar (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.20% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.050% fail on Swivelling towbar
  • 0.60% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.60% fail on Attachment