MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Ford » Ranger » 2009
Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Ford Ranger MOT Results

Registered in 2009
60.3% pass rate
from 3,509 tests in 2020
(11% better than other 2009 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 vans and highlighted areas where the Ford Ranger is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.7% fail on Position lamps (58% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 5.5% fail on Position lamp (56% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on All position lamps
    • 4.8% fail on Headlamps (44% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 4.7% fail on Headlamp (48% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 4.8% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (120% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 4.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (120% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 4.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (120% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.057% fail on Switch
    • 4.0% fail on Stop lamp (39% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (31% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim (22% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim (27% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.37% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.3% fail on Direction indicators (48% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Flashing type (48% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.88% fail on Individual direction indicators (49% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.37% fail on Side repeaters (55% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.085% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.85% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.34% fail on Trailer electrical socket (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Horn (73% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.028% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.77% fail on Rear reflectors (88% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.17% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.17% fail on Switch
    • 0.057% fail on Reversing lamps (80% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.057% fail on Reversing lamps (79% better than other 2009 vans)
  • 13% fail on Brakes
    • 7.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes (110% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.6% fail on Brake performance (52% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.2% fail on Rbt
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.43% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.11% fail on Decelerometer (8 times worse than other 2009 vans)
          • 0.11% fail on Service brake performance (9 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.057% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.028% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.028% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.68% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.66% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.37% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.34% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.028% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.68% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (87% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.60% fail on Rbt (sp) (88% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.085% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.40% fail on Brake performance not tested (120% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Parking brake performance (86% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.28% fail on Rbt (86% better than other 2009 vans)
          • 0.23% fail on Parking brake performance (87% better than other 2009 vans)
          • 0.057% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 2.6% fail on Mechanical brake components (45% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Brake linings and pads (32% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 2.2% fail on Brake pads (33% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.028% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.26% fail on Brake discs and drums (83% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.23% fail on Brake discs (85% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.028% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.23% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.23% fail on Cable
    • 1.8% fail on Load sensing valves (10 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.85% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.85% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.26% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (62% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Pedal (60% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.057% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.26% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.17% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.028% fail on Master cylinder
      • 0.028% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.028% fail on Valves
    • 0.11% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.085% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.028% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.057% fail on Flexible brake hoses (80% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.028% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.028% fail on Lever
    • 0.028% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.028% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.028% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
  • 7.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.7% fail on Transmission
      • 2.0% fail on Drive shafts (39% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 2.0% fail on Joints (38% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Prop shafts (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Joints (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.48% fail on Prop shaft (190% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.057% fail on Flexible couplings
        • 0.057% fail on Bearing housing
    • 2.5% fail on Exhaust system (35% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.51% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.51% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.46% fail on Chassis
      • 0.46% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.34% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.26% fail on Towbar (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Other towbar components (5 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.028% fail on Safety device
      • 0.028% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.23% fail on Fuel system (64% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Pipe
      • 0.057% fail on Tank
      • 0.028% fail on System
    • 0.17% fail on Body (65% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Other body component
      • 0.028% fail on Panel
    • 0.14% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.11% fail on Spare wheel condition (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.028% fail on Carrier
    • 0.14% fail on Doors (72% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.085% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.085% fail on Hinge (9 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.057% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.057% fail on Door condition
    • 0.057% fail on Cabs
      • 0.057% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.028% fail on Load security
      • 0.028% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.028% fail on Other tailgate component
    • 0.028% fail on Passenger compartment
    • 0.028% fail on Undertray
  • 6.6% fail on Suspension (58% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Shock absorbers (90% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Springs (63% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Leaf springs
        • 1.3% fail on Leaf spring
        • 0.11% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
        • 0.028% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
      • 0.11% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (77% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.46% fail on Pins and bushes (57% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.46% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.40% fail on Linkage
      • 0.14% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.028% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 1.3% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.68% fail on Suspension arms (86% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.48% fail on Ball joint (80% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint dust cover (87% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.057% fail on Pins and bushes (97% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.028% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.66% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.057% fail on Other suspension component (91% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.057% fail on Ball joint (85% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.028% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.028% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 6.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 6.3% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 5.7% fail on Compression ignition
        • 3.4% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (33% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (51% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 1.00% fail on Emissions not tested (160% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.14% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.057% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.028% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.028% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.028% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 0.60% fail on Spark ignition (55% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.57% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (52% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.028% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.28% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.11% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.085% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.057% fail on Engine oil leaks (87% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.057% fail on Transmission oil leaks
    • 0.028% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.028% fail on Undertray
  • 6.4% fail on Visibility (25% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Wipers
    • 3.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.17% fail on Condition of glass (66% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Windscreen (65% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.14% fail on View to rear (83% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Mirrors (83% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.11% fail on Driver's view
  • 4.0% fail on Tyres (36% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Tread depth (22% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.00% fail on Condition (59% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.14% fail on Size/type
  • 3.8% fail on Steering
    • 3.0% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint (5 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.68% fail on Drag link end (10 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.60% fail on Track rod end (83% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Intermediate drop arm (38 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Locking devices (5 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.085% fail on Other components (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.085% fail on Steering linkage (6 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.028% fail on Lock stop
    • 0.31% fail on Steering play
      • 0.31% fail on Steering box (25 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.28% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.23% fail on Steering box (34 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.028% fail on Operation
      • 0.028% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.20% fail on Power steering
      • 0.085% fail on Pump
      • 0.085% fail on Other components
      • 0.028% fail on Operation
      • 0.028% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.085% fail on Prescribed areas (13 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.028% fail on Steering shaft
    • 0.028% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.028% fail on Flexible coupling
      • 0.028% fail on Universal joint
  • 1.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (35% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.60% fail on Condition
      • 0.54% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.085% fail on Requirements
    • 0.37% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (61% better than other 2009 vans)
  • 0.94% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.94% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.28% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.28% fail on Attachment
  • 0.028% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.028% fail on Speedometer
  • 0.028% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.028% fail on Anchorages