MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Ford » Ranger » 2009
Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Ford Ranger MOT Results

Registered in 2009
64.5% pass rate
from 3,148 tests in 2017
(14% better than other 2009 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 vans and highlighted areas where the Ford Ranger is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (11% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 8.8% fail on Registration plate lamp (15% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 8.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.5% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.0% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.16% fail on All position lamps
    • 4.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (110% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 4.1% fail on Fog lamp (110% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.064% fail on Tell tale
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.064% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.064% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
        • 0.032% fail on Headlamp levelling device
        • 0.032% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
      • 0.032% fail on Matched pair
    • 3.0% fail on Stop lamp (54% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Direction indicators (52% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Flashing type (52% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.95% fail on Individual lamps (44% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.29% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.032% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.67% fail on Rear reflectors (110% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.60% fail on Trailer electrical socket (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.35% fail on Battery
    • 0.25% fail on Horn (69% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.13% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.095% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.064% fail on Lamp
      • 0.032% fail on Tell tale
  • 12% fail on Brakes
    • 8.5% fail on Hydraulic systems (140% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 8.2% fail on Components (150% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 6.9% fail on Pipes (160% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Valves (10 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.35% fail on Hoses
        • 0.064% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.60% fail on Leaks (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.095% fail on Operation
    • 3.3% fail on Brake performance (50% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.89% fail on Rear wheels (69% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.60% fail on Parking brake performance (86% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Brake performance not tested (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.19% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.095% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.032% fail on Parking brake operation
    • 2.2% fail on Hub components (48% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Brake pads (35% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 0.32% fail on Parking brake (67% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Condition (67% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.19% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.095% fail on Cable
      • 0.064% fail on Lever
      • 0.032% fail on Brake slack adjuster
    • 0.16% fail on ABS (74% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.13% fail on Service brake control components (79% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Pedal (79% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.095% fail on Anti-slip (82% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.032% fail on Condition
    • 0.095% fail on Restricted movement
  • 7.1% fail on Suspension (53% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Shock absorbers (110% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.8% fail on Condition (110% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Drive shafts (40% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Front drive shafts (45% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Constant velocity joints (44% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.16% fail on Universal joint (10 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.98% fail on Front
      • 0.44% fail on Rear
    • 1.4% fail on Leaf springs
      • 1.3% fail on Condition (83% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.095% fail on Pins and bushes
        • 0.095% fail on Shackle
      • 0.032% fail on Spring eye
      • 0.032% fail on Spring saddle
      • 0.032% fail on Securing bolts
    • 0.51% fail on Anti-roll bars (90% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (80% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (95% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.064% fail on Attachment
      • 0.064% fail on Linkage condition (81% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.19% fail on Suspension arms (93% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (94% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on Attachment
    • 0.16% fail on Front suspension joints (87% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.095% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.032% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.032% fail on Spring mounting
      • 0.032% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 0.032% fail on Torsion bars
      • 0.032% fail on Condition
    • 0.032% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 6.2% fail on Driver's view of the road (28% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Wipers
    • 2.7% fail on Washers
    • 0.32% fail on Mirrors (62% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.29% fail on Windscreen (70% better than other 2009 vans)
  • 3.8% fail on Tyres (42% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Tread depth (34% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Condition (54% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.13% fail on Valve stem
    • 0.032% fail on Size/type
  • 2.3% fail on Steering (39% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Steering system (36% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.70% fail on Other components (19 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.70% fail on Steering pivot point (21 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.57% fail on Ball joint (180% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Drag link end (6 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Track rod end (90% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Free play
        • 0.19% fail on Steering box (37 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.13% fail on Steering box (35 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.064% fail on Lock stop (29 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.095% fail on Power steering (77% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.064% fail on Operation
      • 0.064% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.032% fail on Other components
    • 0.064% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.032% fail on Steering operation
  • 1.5% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (37% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.41% fail on Emissions not tested (120% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.13% fail on Fuel system (82% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.064% fail on Cap
      • 0.032% fail on Pipe
      • 0.032% fail on System
    • 0.032% fail on Emissions
  • 1.3% fail on Registration plates and VIN (51% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate (52% worse than other 2009 vans)
  • 1.0% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.73% fail on Body condition
    • 0.095% fail on Spare wheel
    • 0.064% fail on Doors (86% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.064% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.064% fail on Load security
      • 0.064% fail on Hinged tailboard (17 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.032% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.032% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.032% fail on Chassis
    • 0.032% fail on Body security
  • 0.98% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (38% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.57% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.32% fail on Condition
      • 0.22% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.032% fail on Attachment
      • 0.032% fail on Installation check
        • 0.032% fail on Belt(s)/padding
    • 0.41% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.38% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.032% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.19% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.16% fail on Attachment
    • 0.032% fail on Condition
  • 0.13% fail on Towbars (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.13% fail on Towbar (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)