Ford Ranger MOT Results

Registered in 2010
62.2% pass rate
from 1,798 tests in 2020
(13% better than other 2010 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Ford Ranger is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (9.3% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 6.0% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (190% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 6.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (190% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 6.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (200% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Stop lamp (38% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (33% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim (12% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim (11% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (28% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamps (33% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp (32% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Headlamp levelling device (39% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Direction indicators (49% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Flashing type (49% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.89% fail on Individual direction indicators (53% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.50% fail on Side repeaters (39% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.056% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.2% fail on Electrical equipment (3.7% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.50% fail on Battery(ies) (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Trailer electrical socket (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Electrical wiring (100% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Horn (80% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.67% fail on Position lamps (68% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.67% fail on Position lamp (75% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.39% fail on Reversing lamps (39% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Reversing lamps (36% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.28% fail on Rear reflectors (15% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.056% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.056% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 15% fail on Brakes (4.9% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 8.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Brake performance (34% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Service brake performance (27% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 2.4% fail on Rbt (21% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 2.1% fail on Service brake performance (29% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.56% fail on Service brake imbalance (2.5% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.11% fail on Decelerometer (11 times worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.11% fail on Service brake performance (11 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.056% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.056% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.95% fail on Brake performance not tested (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.83% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (0.99% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.83% fail on Rbt (sp) (0.95% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.44% fail on Service brake performance (12% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.39% fail on Service brake imbalance (4.2% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.61% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (87% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.56% fail on Rbt (sp) (88% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.056% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.44% fail on Parking brake performance (75% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.44% fail on Rbt (74% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.44% fail on Parking brake performance (71% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Mechanical brake components (58% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Brake linings and pads (47% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Brake pads (46% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Brake discs and drums (86% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.22% fail on Brake discs (86% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Load sensing valves (22 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (8.4% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.95% fail on Anti-lock braking system (0.37% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.056% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.33% fail on Hydraulic systems (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Brake fluid (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.056% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.056% fail on Valves
    • 0.22% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (66% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Pedal (68% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.056% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.17% fail on Parking brake control (69% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Lever (69% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.056% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.056% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.056% fail on Other components
  • 6.6% fail on Body, chassis, structure (7.9% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.9% fail on Transmission (23% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Drive shafts (41% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.9% fail on Joints (42% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.056% fail on Bearing housing
      • 1.1% fail on Prop shafts (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.67% fail on Joints (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.39% fail on Prop shaft (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.056% fail on Flexible couplings
    • 0.83% fail on Exhaust system (36% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.78% fail on Bumpers (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.78% fail on Body (94% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.67% fail on Other body component (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.056% fail on Mounting fixings
      • 0.056% fail on Panel
    • 0.44% fail on Chassis (82% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Chassis condition (83% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.44% fail on Fuel system (5.1% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on Pipe (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.056% fail on Tank
      • 0.056% fail on System
    • 0.17% fail on Integral vehicle structure (58% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (57% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.17% fail on Seats (17% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Driver's seat (16% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.056% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.11% fail on Spare wheel (64% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Carrier (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.11% fail on Load security (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Tailgate (13 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.11% fail on Tailgate condition (31 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.11% fail on Cabs (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.056% fail on Doors
      • 0.056% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.056% fail on Door condition
    • 0.056% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.056% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 6.4% fail on Visibility (21% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Washers (5.2% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.9% fail on Wipers (24% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.33% fail on View to rear (57% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on Mirrors (56% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.22% fail on Condition of glass (51% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Windscreen (51% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.056% fail on Driver's view
  • 6.0% fail on Suspension (61% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Springs (51% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Leaf springs (31% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.9% fail on Leaf spring (69% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Shock absorbers (55% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Wheel bearings (21% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Anti-roll bars (80% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.56% fail on Linkage (77% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (38% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Pins and bushes (73% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.056% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.44% fail on Suspension arms (91% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on Ball joint (87% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.056% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.056% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.056% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.28% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (57% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.056% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.056% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  • 4.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (16% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Exhaust emissions (15% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.1% fail on Compression ignition (3.5% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 2.3% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (24% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (38% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.28% fail on Emissions not tested (13% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.17% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.056% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.056% fail on Particulate filter
      • 0.39% fail on Spark ignition (64% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.33% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (66% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.056% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.33% fail on Fluid leaks (34% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Other leaks (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Engine oil leaks (71% better than other 2010 vans)
  • 3.4% fail on Tyres (44% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Tread depth (42% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Condition (51% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.11% fail on Size/type (41% better than other 2010 vans)
  • 3.3% fail on Steering (33% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Steering linkage components (35% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.95% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.67% fail on Drag link end (12 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Track rod end (88% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Intermediate drop arm (60 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Other components (17 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.11% fail on Steering component (31 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.11% fail on Steering linkage (11 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Locking devices (12 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.056% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.33% fail on Steering gear (15% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Steering box (42 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.056% fail on Operation
    • 0.22% fail on Power steering (44% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Other components (6.6% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.056% fail on Operation
      • 0.056% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.22% fail on Steering play (29% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Steering box (75 times worse than other 2010 vans)
  • 1.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (24% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.83% fail on Seat belts (27% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Condition (27% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on Prescribed areas (28% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.056% fail on Requirements
    • 0.56% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (27% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.11% fail on Airbags (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Drivers airbag (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
  • 0.95% fail on Identification of the vehicle (38% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.95% fail on Registration plates (39% worse than other 2010 vans)
  • 0.33% fail on Road Wheels (22% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.33% fail on Attachment (59% worse than other 2010 vans)