Ford Ranger MOT Results

Registered in 2010
64.5% pass rate
from 1,918 tests in 2020
(17% better than other 2010 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Ford Ranger is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (15% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.8% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 5.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 5.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.10% fail on Switch
    • 4.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.1% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.16% fail on All position lamps
    • 3.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (34% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.10% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.9% fail on Stop lamp (52% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.10% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.89% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.36% fail on Trailer electrical socket (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Horn (65% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.10% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.78% fail on Direction indicators (71% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.78% fail on Flashing type (71% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.63% fail on Individual direction indicators (65% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.16% fail on Side repeaters (82% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.052% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.52% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.52% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.42% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.10% fail on Outline marker lamps
      • 0.10% fail on Outline marker lamp
    • 0.052% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.052% fail on Switch
  • 12% fail on Brakes
    • 7.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Brake performance (49% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.2% fail on Rbt
          • 1.8% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.63% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.10% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.052% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.052% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.052% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.052% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.63% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.57% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.36% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.26% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.052% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.42% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.31% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (93% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.26% fail on Rbt (sp) (94% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.052% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
    • 2.5% fail on Mechanical brake components (49% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Brake linings and pads (38% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 2.2% fail on Brake pads (37% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Brake discs and drums (83% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.26% fail on Brake discs (83% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.10% fail on Cable
    • 1.4% fail on Load sensing valves (23 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.2% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.21% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (69% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Pedal (80% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.16% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.10% fail on Valves (15 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.052% fail on Servos
    • 0.052% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.052% fail on Lever
    • 0.052% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.052% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.052% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 6.1% fail on Visibility (23% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Wipers
    • 2.8% fail on Washers
    • 0.42% fail on View to rear
      • 0.42% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.10% fail on Condition of glass (79% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Windscreen (79% better than other 2010 vans)
  • 6.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.9% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 5.3% fail on Compression ignition
        • 3.3% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (51% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.73% fail on Emissions not tested (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.10% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
      • 0.68% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.52% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.10% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.052% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.10% fail on Fluid leaks (81% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.052% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.052% fail on Transmission oil leaks
    • 0.052% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.052% fail on Sound deadening material
  • 5.4% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 2.1% fail on Transmission (41% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Drive shafts (59% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Joints (58% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.052% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.83% fail on Prop shafts (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.52% fail on Joints (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.26% fail on Prop shaft
        • 0.052% fail on Flexible couplings
    • 1.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.78% fail on Body
      • 0.78% fail on Other body component (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.36% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.31% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.21% fail on Pipe
      • 0.052% fail on Tank
      • 0.052% fail on Hose
    • 0.26% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.21% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.052% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.16% fail on Load security
      • 0.16% fail on Tailgate (11 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.16% fail on Tailgate condition (22 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.052% fail on Other tailgate component
    • 0.10% fail on Towbar
      • 0.052% fail on Towbar condition
      • 0.052% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.052% fail on Chassis
      • 0.052% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.052% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.052% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.052% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.052% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.052% fail on Passenger compartment
  • 5.0% fail on Suspension (65% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Shock absorbers (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Springs (64% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Leaf springs
        • 1.4% fail on Leaf spring
    • 0.89% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.89% fail on Anti-roll bars (84% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.42% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.21% fail on Linkage
      • 0.16% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.052% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.052% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.21% fail on Suspension arms (95% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Ball joint (95% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.052% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.052% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.16% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.052% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 2.9% fail on Tyres (52% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Tread depth (45% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.94% fail on Condition (61% better than other 2010 vans)
  • 2.6% fail on Steering (45% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Steering linkage components (47% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.68% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Drag link end (10 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.47% fail on Track rod end (87% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Intermediate drop arm (44 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Lock stop (39 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.052% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.052% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.21% fail on Power steering
      • 0.10% fail on Other components
      • 0.052% fail on Operation
      • 0.052% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.052% fail on Pump
    • 0.16% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.16% fail on Steering box (29 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Steering play
      • 0.16% fail on Steering box (36 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.052% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.052% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.052% fail on Flexible coupling
  • 1.2% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.1% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.78% fail on Condition
      • 0.21% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.16% fail on Requirements
    • 0.16% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (79% better than other 2010 vans)
  • 0.99% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.99% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.16% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.16% fail on Attachment
  • 0.052% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.052% fail on Anchorages