Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Ford Ranger MOT Results

Registered in 2010
70.1% pass rate
from 1,710 tests in 2017
(24% better than other 2010 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Ford Ranger is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (23% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 6.5% fail on Registration plate lamp (36% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 6.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.2% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.94% fail on Rear lamps (49% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on All position lamps
    • 4.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.5% fail on Fog lamp (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.058% fail on Tell tale
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim (46% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Stop lamp (63% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamps (58% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp (60% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.058% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.058% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 0.76% fail on Trailer electrical socket (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.53% fail on Direction indicators (81% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.53% fail on Flashing type (81% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.29% fail on Individual lamps (83% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.23% fail on Side repeaters (71% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.29% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.23% fail on Battery
    • 0.23% fail on Horn
    • 0.18% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.18% fail on Switch
    • 0.058% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 9.5% fail on Brakes (19% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.3% fail on Hydraulic systems (89% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 5.1% fail on Components (100% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 4.7% fail on Pipes (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.47% fail on Valves (8 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.058% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.18% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.18% fail on Leaks
      • 0.058% fail on Operation
    • 2.6% fail on Brake performance (50% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.99% fail on Rear wheels (57% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.82% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.53% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.53% fail on Parking brake performance (85% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.058% fail on Brake operation
    • 2.4% fail on Hub components (45% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Brake pads (39% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Brake discs (89% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.058% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.058% fail on Brake back plates
      • 0.058% fail on Brake calipers
    • 0.82% fail on ABS
    • 0.29% fail on Parking brake (66% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Condition (66% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.29% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.18% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.18% fail on Cable
    • 0.058% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.058% fail on Pedal
        • 0.058% fail on Anti-slip
  • 6.4% fail on Driver's view of the road (22% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Wipers
    • 2.0% fail on Washers
    • 0.23% fail on Windscreen (77% better than other 2010 vans)
  • 4.0% fail on Suspension (70% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.6% fail on Condition
    • 1.2% fail on Leaf springs
      • 1.1% fail on Condition (180% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Pins and bushes
        • 0.12% fail on Shackle
        • 0.058% fail on Anchor
    • 0.70% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.53% fail on Front
      • 0.18% fail on Rear
    • 0.58% fail on Drive shafts (79% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.58% fail on Front drive shafts (79% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.58% fail on Constant velocity joints (79% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.23% fail on Anti-roll bars (95% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (90% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Attachment
      • 0.058% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.058% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.058% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.058% fail on Panhard rods
      • 0.058% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.058% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 3.1% fail on Tyres (50% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.41% fail on Condition (85% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.058% fail on Size/type
  • 1.6% fail on Steering (56% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Steering system (53% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.47% fail on Drag link end (10 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.29% fail on Track rod end (89% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Other components (8 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.18% fail on Steering pivot point (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.058% fail on Steering component
      • 0.12% fail on Free play
        • 0.12% fail on Steering box (98 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.058% fail on Steering box
      • 0.058% fail on Intermediate drop arm
      • 0.058% fail on Lock stop
    • 0.058% fail on Steering control
      • 0.058% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.058% fail on Locking devices
  • 1.1% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.82% fail on Body condition
    • 0.18% fail on Seats
      • 0.18% fail on Passengers
    • 0.058% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.058% fail on Chassis
    • 0.058% fail on Body security
    • 0.058% fail on Load security
      • 0.058% fail on Bootlid
  • 1.1% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 0.99% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.23% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.058% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.058% fail on Cap
  • 0.94% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.94% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.64% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.53% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.41% fail on Condition
      • 0.058% fail on Requirements
      • 0.058% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.12% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (81% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (80% better than other 2010 vans)
  • 0.12% fail on Towbars
    • 0.12% fail on Towbar