MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Ford » Ranger » 2010

Ford Ranger MOT Results

Registered in 2010
57.9% pass rate
from 1,813 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Ford Ranger is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 7.7% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 7.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 7.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.6% fail on Stop lamp (36% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.33% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.0% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.055% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.4% fail on Direction indicators (52% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Flashing type (52% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.0% fail on Individual direction indicators (47% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.17% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.17% fail on Side repeaters (81% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.88% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.33% fail on Trailer electrical socket (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.22% fail on Horn
      • 0.11% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.77% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.77% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.50% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.50% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.17% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.17% fail on Switch
    • 0.17% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.11% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.055% fail on Main beam tell-tale
      • 0.055% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 16% fail on Brakes
    • 8.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.6% fail on Brake performance (28% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.2% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.1% fail on Rbt
          • 2.4% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.88% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.11% fail on Decelerometer (12 times worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.11% fail on Service brake performance (13 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (67% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.88% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.72% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.28% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (18 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (76% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (80% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.22% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.55% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.39% fail on Parking brake performance (80% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.33% fail on Rbt (82% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.22% fail on Parking brake performance (87% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.11% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.055% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.055% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 2.3% fail on Load sensing valves (29 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Mechanical brake components (56% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Brake linings and pads (41% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.8% fail on Brake pads (41% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Brake discs and drums (73% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.44% fail on Brake discs (73% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.11% fail on Cable
    • 0.94% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.94% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.33% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.22% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.055% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.055% fail on Valves
    • 0.17% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (75% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Pedal
      • 0.055% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.17% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.11% fail on Additional braking device (26 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.055% fail on Other components
    • 0.11% fail on Parking brake control (80% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Lever (80% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.11% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.055% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.055% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.055% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 9.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure (23% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.5% fail on Transmission
      • 2.6% fail on Drive shafts
        • 2.5% fail on Joints
        • 0.055% fail on Drive shaft
      • 2.0% fail on Prop shafts (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Joints (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.50% fail on Prop shaft
        • 0.055% fail on Bearing housing
      • 0.11% fail on Belts (20 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.1% fail on Chassis (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Chassis condition (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Body (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.94% fail on Other body component (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 0.72% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.72% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.55% fail on Bumpers (180% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.44% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.22% fail on Pipe
      • 0.055% fail on Tank
      • 0.055% fail on Hose
      • 0.055% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.055% fail on System
    • 0.22% fail on Boot lid (16 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Boot lid condition (12 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.055% fail on Other boot lid component
    • 0.17% fail on Doors
      • 0.17% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.17% fail on Hinge (25 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.11% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.11% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.11% fail on Towbar
      • 0.055% fail on Coupling
      • 0.055% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.055% fail on Load security
      • 0.055% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.055% fail on Other tailgate component
    • 0.055% fail on Cabs
      • 0.055% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 8.2% fail on Suspension (52% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Springs (49% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Leaf springs
        • 1.9% fail on Leaf spring
        • 0.11% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
      • 0.50% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (61% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.66% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.33% fail on Pins and bushes (68% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting (8 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.3% fail on Suspension arms (77% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Ball joint (65% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Pins and bushes (90% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint dust cover (82% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers (90% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.99% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.11% fail on Other suspension component (82% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.055% fail on Axles
      • 0.055% fail on Axle
    • 0.055% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.055% fail on Ball joint
  • 7.9% fail on Visibility
    • 4.6% fail on Wipers
    • 3.4% fail on Washers
    • 0.39% fail on View to rear
      • 0.39% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.11% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.055% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.055% fail on Windscreen
  • 6.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 6.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 6.0% fail on Compression ignition (33% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 3.1% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (67% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.9% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.99% fail on Emissions not tested (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.11% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.055% fail on Particulate filter
          • 0.055% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.055% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 0.77% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.77% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.50% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.44% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.055% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 3.8% fail on Steering (30% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Steering linkage components (37% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.94% fail on Track rod end (77% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.83% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.77% fail on Drag link end (10 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Locking devices (8 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Intermediate drop arm (37 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Steering arm (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.055% fail on Other components
        • 0.055% fail on Steering linkage
      • 0.055% fail on Lock stop
    • 0.66% fail on Steering play (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.66% fail on Steering box (82 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.33% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.28% fail on Steering box (68 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.055% fail on Operation
    • 0.055% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.055% fail on Power steering
      • 0.055% fail on Other components
    • 0.055% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.055% fail on Flexible coupling
  • 3.3% fail on Tyres (46% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Tread depth (34% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.72% fail on Condition (73% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.22% fail on Size/type
  • 1.8% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.6% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.88% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.72% fail on Condition
    • 0.22% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (75% better than other 2010 vans)
  • 0.94% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.94% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.39% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.39% fail on Attachment
  • 0.055% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.055% fail on Speedometer
Read the Honest John Review