Ford Ranger MOT Results

Registered in 2016
84.2% pass rate
from 12,203 tests in 2020
(28% better than other 2016 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 vans and highlighted areas where the Ford Ranger is unusually good or bad.

  • 6.7% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (30% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.0082% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.99% fail on Stop lamp (44% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.76% fail on Direction indicators (34% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.76% fail on Flashing type (34% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.71% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.049% fail on Individual direction indicators (82% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.75% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.75% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.75% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.60% fail on Electrical equipment (130% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Trailer electrical socket (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.049% fail on Horn
      • 0.033% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.0082% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.53% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (65% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.44% fail on Headlamps (72% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.43% fail on Headlamp (71% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.016% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.39% fail on Position lamps (65% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Position lamp (65% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.0082% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.25% fail on Reversing lamps (110% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Reversing lamps (100% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.0082% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 0.041% fail on Rear reflectors (81% better than other 2016 vans)
  • 3.0% fail on Tyres (23% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.2% fail on Condition (44% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.074% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.033% fail on Size/type
  • 3.0% fail on Brakes (40% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Mechanical brake components (52% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Brake linings and pads (50% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Brake pads (51% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.049% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.14% fail on Brake discs and drums (74% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Brake discs (75% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.0082% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.016% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.016% fail on Cable
    • 0.64% fail on Brake performance (55% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.40% fail on Rbt
          • 0.25% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.20% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.0082% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.0082% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.26% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (98% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.24% fail on Rbt (sp) (89% worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.21% fail on Service brake imbalance (200% worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.074% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.025% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (80% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Rbt (sp) (82% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.016% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.11% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.11% fail on Rbt
          • 0.090% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.016% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.0082% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.0082% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.025% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.54% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (120% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Anti-lock braking system (200% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Electronic stability control (85% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.0082% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.38% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.35% fail on Pedal
      • 0.025% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.082% fail on Parking brake control (77% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.082% fail on Lever (77% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.074% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.057% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.016% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.049% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.041% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.025% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.016% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 2.0% fail on Suspension
    • 1.4% fail on Springs (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Coil springs (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Coil spring (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Leaf springs (140% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.19% fail on Leaf spring (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.016% fail on Anchor bracket
        • 0.0082% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
    • 0.51% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.11% fail on Anti-roll bars (80% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.066% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.025% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.0082% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.0082% fail on Linkage
      • 0.0082% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 0.033% fail on Suspension arms (92% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.016% fail on Pins and bushes (82% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.016% fail on Ball joint (94% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.0082% fail on Axles
      • 0.0082% fail on Axle
  • 1.5% fail on Visibility (65% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.87% fail on Washers (51% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.43% fail on Wipers (75% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.15% fail on Condition of glass (70% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Windscreen (69% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.041% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.041% fail on View to rear (91% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.041% fail on Mirrors (90% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.0082% fail on Bonnet
  • 0.79% fail on Body, chassis, structure (41% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.21% fail on Transmission (43% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Drive shafts (62% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Joints (61% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.082% fail on Prop shafts (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.074% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.0082% fail on Prop shaft
    • 0.13% fail on Body (68% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Other body component (62% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.0082% fail on Panel
    • 0.090% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.066% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.033% fail on Pipe
      • 0.025% fail on System
      • 0.0082% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.066% fail on Seats
      • 0.057% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.0082% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.057% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.033% fail on Carrier
      • 0.025% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.057% fail on Doors
      • 0.041% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.041% fail on Door condition
      • 0.016% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.016% fail on Door condition
    • 0.041% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.041% fail on Towbar
      • 0.025% fail on Other towbar components
      • 0.0082% fail on Towbar condition
      • 0.0082% fail on Coupling
    • 0.041% fail on Load security
      • 0.033% fail on Tailgate (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.033% fail on Tailgate condition (10 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.0082% fail on Access panel
  • 0.76% fail on Identification of the vehicle (120% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.76% fail on Registration plates (120% worse than other 2016 vans)
  • 0.51% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (55% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.47% fail on Exhaust emissions (55% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Compression ignition (56% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.25% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (54% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.066% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (62% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.016% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.0082% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.0082% fail on Other emission control equipment
      • 0.12% fail on Spark ignition (55% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (53% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.041% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.025% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.016% fail on Other leaks
  • 0.32% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (57% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.23% fail on Seat belts (59% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Condition (65% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.049% fail on Requirements
    • 0.090% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.13% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.11% fail on Attachment
    • 0.016% fail on Condition
  • 0.074% fail on Steering (78% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.066% fail on Steering linkage components (68% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.066% fail on Track rod end (64% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.0082% fail on Steering wheel