Ford Transit Connect MOT Results
Registered in 200248.9% pass rate
from 595 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the Ford Transit Connect is unusually good or bad.
-
28% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(35% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
9.2% fail on
Headlamps
(110% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 7.7% fail on Headlamp (100% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 2.0% fail on Headlamp levelling device (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 8.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (150% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 7.4% fail on Stop lamp
-
5.0% fail on
Direction indicators
-
5.0% fail on
Flashing type
- 4.0% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 1.0% fail on All direction indicators (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
-
5.0% fail on
Flashing type
-
4.0% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.17% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
2.5% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 1.8% fail on Battery(ies) (190% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 1.0% fail on Horn
-
2.0% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
2.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 2.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
2.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.67% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.67% fail on Position lamp
-
0.67% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.67% fail on Switch
- 0.17% fail on Rear reflectors
-
9.2% fail on
Headlamps
(110% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
28% fail on
Suspension
(40% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 14% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (92% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
12% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(190% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 5.2% fail on Linkage ball joints (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 3.2% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 2.0% fail on Pins and bushes
- 1.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.84% fail on Linkage
- 0.50% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.34% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.34% fail on Ball joint
-
4.5% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover (130% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.84% fail on Ball joint (74% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.67% fail on Pins and bushes
- 3.5% fail on Wheel bearings (77% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
2.9% fail on
Springs
-
1.8% fail on
Leaf springs
- 0.84% fail on Leaf spring
- 0.67% fail on Shackle bracket (10 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.34% fail on Anchor bracket (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.17% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
- 0.84% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
0.17% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.17% fail on Coil spring
-
1.8% fail on
Leaf springs
-
1.3% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.67% fail on Ball joint
- 0.67% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.17% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.84% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.34% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.17% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.17% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
0.17% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.17% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
23% fail on
Brakes
(23% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
16% fail on
Brake performance
-
8.9% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(66% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
8.9% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(67% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 5.9% fail on Service brake imbalance (110% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 4.2% fail on Service brake performance
-
8.9% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(67% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
6.4% fail on
Service brake performance
-
6.2% fail on
Rbt
- 5.5% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.5% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.34% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.34% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
6.2% fail on
Rbt
-
5.0% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 5.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
2.5% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
2.5% fail on
Rbt
- 2.2% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.34% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
2.5% fail on
Rbt
- 0.34% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
8.9% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(66% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 10% fail on Rigid brake pipes (110% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
1.8% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.3% fail on Brake pads
-
0.50% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.50% fail on Brake discs
-
0.34% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.34% fail on Cable
-
1.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
1.2% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 1.0% fail on Pedal
- 0.17% fail on Hand lever
-
0.67% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.67% fail on Lever
- 0.67% fail on Flexible brake hoses
- 0.67% fail on Load sensing valves (69% better than other 2002 vans)
-
0.50% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.17% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.17% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.17% fail on Valves
-
0.34% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.34% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
16% fail on
Brake performance
-
13% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
5.0% fail on
Transmission
-
5.0% fail on
Drive shafts
- 5.0% fail on Joints
-
5.0% fail on
Drive shafts
-
2.5% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 2.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
- 2.0% fail on Bumpers (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 1.5% fail on Exhaust system (55% better than other 2002 vans)
-
1.2% fail on
Chassis
(61% better than other 2002 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Chassis condition (61% better than other 2002 vans)
-
1.0% fail on
Seats
- 0.67% fail on Passenger's seat (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.34% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.84% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.34% fail on Tank
- 0.17% fail on Hose
- 0.17% fail on Pipe
- 0.17% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.67% fail on
Engine mounting
(3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.50% fail on Engine mounting condition
- 0.17% fail on Bracket
-
0.50% fail on
Body
- 0.50% fail on Other body component
-
0.17% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.17% fail on Carrier
-
0.17% fail on
Towbar
- 0.17% fail on Coupling
- 0.17% fail on Floor
-
0.17% fail on
Cabs
- 0.17% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.17% fail on Undertray
-
5.0% fail on
Transmission
-
10% fail on
Visibility
- 5.5% fail on Washers
- 5.0% fail on Wipers
-
0.67% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.67% fail on Windscreen
- 0.34% fail on Bonnet
-
0.34% fail on
View to rear
- 0.34% fail on Mirrors
-
9.6% fail on
Tyres
(81% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 6.1% fail on Tread depth (99% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 3.4% fail on Condition
- 0.50% fail on Size/type
-
7.4% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(74% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
6.7% fail on
Seat belts
(120% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 6.2% fail on Prescribed areas (190% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.50% fail on Condition
- 0.67% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
6.7% fail on
Seat belts
(120% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
3.2% fail on
Steering
(52% better than other 2002 vans)
-
1.5% fail on
Steering linkage components
(65% better than other 2002 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Track rod end (70% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.34% fail on Ball joint
-
1.2% fail on
Steering gear
- 1.2% fail on Steering rack
-
0.50% fail on
Power steering
- 0.34% fail on Other components
- 0.17% fail on Pipes and hoses
-
1.5% fail on
Steering linkage components
(65% better than other 2002 vans)
-
3.0% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
1.8% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 1.8% fail on Engine oil leaks (140% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
1.5% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(59% better than other 2002 vans)
-
1.5% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.84% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.50% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.17% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 0.17% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
1.5% fail on
Compression ignition
-
1.8% fail on
Fluid leaks
-
1.7% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.7% fail on Registration plates
-
1.2% fail on
Road Wheels
(2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 1.0% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.34% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
-
0.17% fail on
Speedometer and speed limiter
- 0.17% fail on Speedometer