Ford Transit Connect MOT Results
Registered in 200950.8% pass rate
from 6,704 tests in 2021
(9.9% worse than other 2009 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 vans and highlighted areas where the Ford Transit Connect is unusually good or bad.
-
21% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(8.4% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 9.2% fail on Stop lamp (49% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 5.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
4.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.34% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
4.0% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.9% fail on Headlamp
- 0.16% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
2.2% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.2% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.7% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.39% fail on Side repeaters (54% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.15% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.015% fail on Switch
-
2.2% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.76% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(69% better than other 2009 vans)
-
0.76% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(69% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.76% fail on Rear fog lamp (69% better than other 2009 vans)
-
0.76% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(69% better than other 2009 vans)
-
0.72% fail on
Electrical equipment
(31% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.39% fail on Battery(ies) (87% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.18% fail on Horn (73% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.12% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.060% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
0.36% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.34% fail on Position lamp
- 0.015% fail on All position lamps
-
0.27% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.27% fail on Reversing lamps
-
0.089% fail on
Hazard warning
(74% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.089% fail on Switch (74% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.045% fail on Rear reflectors (89% better than other 2009 vans)
-
18% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(91% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
8.3% fail on
Transmission
(100% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
8.0% fail on
Drive shafts
(120% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 7.9% fail on Joints (120% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.15% fail on Drive shaft (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.015% fail on Flexible couplings
- 0.015% fail on Bearing housing
-
0.31% fail on
Prop shafts
(49% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.30% fail on Joints
- 0.015% fail on Flexible couplings
-
8.0% fail on
Drive shafts
(120% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 4.8% fail on Exhaust system (130% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
3.0% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(180% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 3.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (190% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
2.1% fail on
Fuel system
(2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.78% fail on Hose (9 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.69% fail on Pipe (6 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.37% fail on Tank (190% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.21% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.060% fail on System
-
1.4% fail on
Chassis
(110% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Chassis condition (110% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.015% fail on Strengthening plate
- 0.55% fail on Bumpers (150% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
0.40% fail on
Engine mounting
(200% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.31% fail on Engine mounting condition (180% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.089% fail on Bracket (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
-
0.40% fail on
Seats
(72% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.36% fail on Passenger's seat (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.045% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.30% fail on
Body
(43% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.19% fail on Other body component
- 0.075% fail on Panel
- 0.045% fail on Body condition
-
0.16% fail on
Cabs
- 0.16% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.13% fail on
Doors
(76% better than other 2009 vans)
-
0.075% fail on
Front passenger's door
(69% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.075% fail on Door condition (67% better than other 2009 vans)
-
0.045% fail on
Other passenger's door
(77% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.045% fail on Door condition (75% better than other 2009 vans)
-
0.015% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.015% fail on Door condition
-
0.075% fail on
Front passenger's door
(69% better than other 2009 vans)
-
0.045% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.045% fail on Spare wheel condition
-
0.045% fail on
Towbar
- 0.045% fail on Other towbar components
- 0.045% fail on Undertray
- 0.030% fail on Floor
-
8.3% fail on
Transmission
(100% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
17% fail on
Suspension
-
8.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(31% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 2.9% fail on Linkage ball joints (29% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 2.8% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (94% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover (110% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 1.0% fail on Ball joint (69% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.57% fail on Pins and bushes (50% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.34% fail on Linkage
- 0.15% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (74% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.030% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.015% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.015% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
- 5.9% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
-
2.8% fail on
Suspension arms
(55% better than other 2009 vans)
- 1.7% fail on Ball joint dust cover (36% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.84% fail on Ball joint (72% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.28% fail on Pins and bushes (87% better than other 2009 vans)
- 2.6% fail on Wheel bearings (60% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
0.52% fail on
Springs
(89% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.43% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (140% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
0.060% fail on
Leaf springs
(97% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.015% fail on Leaf spring
- 0.015% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
- 0.015% fail on Spring saddle
- 0.015% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
-
0.030% fail on
Coil springs
(99% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.030% fail on Coil spring (99% better than other 2009 vans)
-
0.49% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.31% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.19% fail on Ball joint (49% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.015% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.19% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.10% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.060% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.015% fail on Ball joint
- 0.015% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.15% fail on Shock absorbers (79% better than other 2009 vans)
-
0.12% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.060% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.045% fail on Ball joint
- 0.015% fail on Suspension rod
-
0.075% fail on
Macpherson strut
(76% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.030% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.015% fail on Macpherson strut
- 0.015% fail on Ball joint
- 0.015% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.015% fail on
Axles
- 0.015% fail on Axle
-
8.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(31% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
17% fail on
Brakes
(12% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
10% fail on
Brake performance
(19% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
6.6% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(16% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 6.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (17% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.015% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
-
3.0% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.0% fail on
Rbt
- 2.3% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.75% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.030% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.030% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.030% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.015% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.015% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
3.0% fail on
Rbt
-
2.7% fail on
Parking brake performance
(26% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
2.7% fail on
Rbt
(27% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 2.4% fail on Parking brake performance (26% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.28% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.030% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.045% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.045% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.015% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.015% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
2.7% fail on
Rbt
(27% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
1.6% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(33% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
1.6% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(36% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 1.0% fail on Service brake imbalance (74% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.66% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.6% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(36% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.33% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
6.6% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(16% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 6.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes (65% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
2.6% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(39% better than other 2009 vans)
-
1.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(41% better than other 2009 vans)
- 1.6% fail on Brake pads (40% better than other 2009 vans)
-
1.1% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(28% better than other 2009 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Brake discs (28% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.030% fail on Brake drums
-
0.18% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
(65% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.13% fail on Cable (65% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.045% fail on Lever
-
1.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(41% better than other 2009 vans)
-
1.1% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.91% fail on Anti-lock braking system (28% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.31% fail on Electronic stability control
-
0.73% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.73% fail on Lever
-
0.69% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.36% fail on Hand lever (120% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.33% fail on Pedal
- 0.25% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.21% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.18% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.030% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
0.18% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.15% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.015% fail on Servos
- 0.015% fail on Reservoirs
-
0.030% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
- 0.030% fail on Other components
- 0.015% fail on Load sensing valves
-
10% fail on
Brake performance
(19% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
9.2% fail on
Visibility
- 5.6% fail on Wipers (37% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 3.3% fail on Washers (24% better than other 2009 vans)
-
0.58% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.57% fail on Windscreen
- 0.015% fail on Window
-
0.37% fail on
View to rear
(47% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.37% fail on Mirrors (46% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.13% fail on Bonnet
- 0.015% fail on Driver's view
-
9.0% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(27% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
8.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(25% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
7.0% fail on
Compression ignition
(32% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 3.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (34% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 2.3% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested (140% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.15% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.089% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.075% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
0.045% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.030% fail on Other emission control equipment
- 0.015% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve
-
1.4% fail on
Spark ignition
- 1.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.13% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.045% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.015% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
7.0% fail on
Compression ignition
(32% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
1.0% fail on
Fluid leaks
(66% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.73% fail on Engine oil leaks (59% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.25% fail on Other leaks (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.030% fail on Transmission oil leaks
-
8.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(25% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
8.8% fail on
Tyres
(40% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 5.3% fail on Tread depth (38% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 4.0% fail on Condition (52% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.31% fail on Size/type
-
5.1% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(75% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
5.0% fail on
Seat belts
(160% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 4.7% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.28% fail on Condition (65% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.015% fail on Attachment
- 0.015% fail on Requirements
- 0.16% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (84% better than other 2009 vans)
-
0.015% fail on
Airbags
- 0.015% fail on Drivers airbag
-
5.0% fail on
Seat belts
(160% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
2.8% fail on
Steering
(46% better than other 2009 vans)
-
1.5% fail on
Steering linkage components
(64% better than other 2009 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Track rod end (66% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.13% fail on Ball joint
- 0.015% fail on Drag link end
- 0.015% fail on Intermediate drop arm
- 0.015% fail on Steering arm
-
0.69% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.67% fail on Steering rack
- 0.015% fail on Operation
-
0.54% fail on
Power steering
- 0.36% fail on Other components (150% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.10% fail on Operation
- 0.089% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.045% fail on Pump
- 0.015% fail on Rams
-
0.15% fail on
Steering play
- 0.15% fail on Steering rack
- 0.030% fail on Steering column
- 0.015% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.015% fail on Electronic power steering
-
1.5% fail on
Steering linkage components
(64% better than other 2009 vans)
-
0.85% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.84% fail on Registration plates
- 0.015% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
-
0.63% fail on
Road Wheels
(97% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.48% fail on Attachment (90% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.16% fail on Condition (140% worse than other 2009 vans)