MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Ford » Transit Connect » 2016

Ford Transit Connect MOT Results

Registered in 2016
77.7% pass rate
from 17,012 tests in 2021
(13% better than other 2016 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 vans and highlighted areas where the Ford Transit Connect is unusually good or bad.

  • 6.9% fail on Tyres (48% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Condition (57% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Tread depth (46% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.13% fail on Size/type
  • 6.0% fail on Visibility (12% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.6% fail on Wipers (40% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Washers
    • 0.47% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.47% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.21% fail on View to rear (46% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Mirrors (46% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.0059% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.018% fail on Bonnet (73% better than other 2016 vans)
  • 5.7% fail on Brakes (11% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Mechanical brake components (25% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 3.6% fail on Brake linings and pads (41% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 3.6% fail on Brake pads (41% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.029% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.52% fail on Brake discs and drums (38% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.52% fail on Brake discs (37% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.065% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.035% fail on Cable
        • 0.035% fail on Lever
    • 1.5% fail on Brake performance (42% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.71% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (56% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.71% fail on Rbt (sp) (56% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Service brake performance (41% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.52% fail on Rbt (40% better than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.43% fail on Service brake performance (37% better than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.11% fail on Service brake imbalance (50% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.0059% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.0059% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.49% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.47% fail on Rbt
          • 0.46% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.012% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.018% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.012% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.0059% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.19% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.19% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.12% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.088% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.14% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.49% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (47% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.46% fail on Pedal (61% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.041% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.16% fail on Hydraulic systems (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Brake fluid (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.059% fail on Reservoirs (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.15% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (73% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.082% fail on Anti-lock braking system (80% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.082% fail on Electronic stability control (73% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.0059% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.094% fail on Parking brake control (71% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.094% fail on Lever (71% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.071% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.059% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.012% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.053% fail on Rigid brake pipes (84% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.041% fail on Flexible brake hoses (69% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.0059% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.0059% fail on Other components
  • 5.2% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (45% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim (31% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim (30% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.094% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (53% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Headlamps (31% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp (28% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.0059% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (41% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.75% fail on Stop lamp (64% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.32% fail on Reversing lamps (79% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Reversing lamps (78% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.012% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 0.15% fail on Direction indicators (90% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Flashing type (90% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.100% fail on Side repeaters (89% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.035% fail on Individual direction indicators (93% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.012% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.13% fail on Rear reflectors (41% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.100% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (86% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.100% fail on Rear fog lamp (86% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.100% fail on Rear fog lamp (86% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.082% fail on Electrical equipment (70% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.071% fail on Horn
      • 0.0059% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.0059% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.065% fail on Position lamps (72% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.065% fail on Position lamp (71% better than other 2016 vans)
  • 1.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 1.8% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.7% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.4% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.25% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (78% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.053% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.047% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.012% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
      • 0.15% fail on Spark ignition (69% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.14% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (69% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.0059% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.071% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.047% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.018% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.0059% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
    • 0.012% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.0059% fail on Sound deadening material
      • 0.0059% fail on Undertray
  • 1.1% fail on Suspension (75% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.56% fail on Suspension arms (56% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Ball joint (39% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.059% fail on Pins and bushes (88% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.0059% fail on Suspension arm
    • 0.16% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.14% fail on Shock absorbers (68% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.12% fail on Anti-roll bars (89% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.059% fail on Linkage ball joints (87% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.024% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.018% fail on Linkage
      • 0.018% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (82% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.012% fail on Ball joint (90% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.088% fail on Springs (94% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.076% fail on Coil springs (94% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.059% fail on Coil spring (96% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.018% fail on Mounting
      • 0.012% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.059% fail on Other suspension component (62% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.029% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.012% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.012% fail on Ball joint (87% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.0059% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.024% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.0059% fail on Axles
      • 0.0059% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.0059% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.0059% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.0059% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.0059% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.0059% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.0059% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 0.71% fail on Body, chassis, structure (66% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.23% fail on Transmission (77% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Drive shafts (75% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.23% fail on Joints (75% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.14% fail on Body (56% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Other body component (55% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.024% fail on Panel
    • 0.088% fail on Exhaust system (67% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.076% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.065% fail on Doors
      • 0.035% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.035% fail on Door condition
      • 0.018% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.012% fail on Door condition
        • 0.0059% fail on Catch
      • 0.012% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.012% fail on Door condition
    • 0.041% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.024% fail on Spare wheel condition
      • 0.018% fail on Carrier
    • 0.035% fail on Fuel system (65% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.024% fail on Tank
      • 0.012% fail on Pipe
    • 0.029% fail on Seats
      • 0.024% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.0059% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.012% fail on Chassis
      • 0.012% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.0059% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.0059% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.0059% fail on Floor
    • 0.0059% fail on Undertray
  • 0.31% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (65% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.25% fail on Seat belts (58% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Condition (64% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.029% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.018% fail on Attachment
      • 0.012% fail on Requirements
    • 0.071% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (77% better than other 2016 vans)
  • 0.21% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.21% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.21% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.16% fail on Attachment
    • 0.047% fail on Condition
  • 0.16% fail on Steering (85% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.11% fail on Steering linkage components (85% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.059% fail on Track rod end (92% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.053% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.035% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.035% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.0059% fail on Power steering
      • 0.0059% fail on Other components
    • 0.0059% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.0059% fail on Steering play
      • 0.0059% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.0059% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 0.012% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.012% fail on Belt(s)/padding