Ford Transit Custom MOT Results

Registered in 2016
79.4% pass rate
from 287 tests in 2020
(11% better than other 2016 vans)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 vans and highlighted areas where the Ford Transit Custom is unusually good or bad.

  • 7.7% fail on Visibility (53% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Wipers (59% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Washers (50% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on View to rear (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Mirrors (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.35% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.35% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.35% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.35% fail on Windscreen
  • 6.3% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (28% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim (8.8% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim (1.1% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.7% fail on Stop lamp (11% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Headlamps (38% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Headlamp (36% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.70% fail on Direction indicators (43% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.70% fail on Flashing type (43% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.70% fail on Side repeaters (18% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.35% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.35% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.35% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 4.2% fail on Brakes (29% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Mechanical brake components (17% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 3.1% fail on Brake linings and pads (11% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 3.1% fail on Brake pads (12% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Brake discs and drums (130% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Brake discs (130% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.35% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.35% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.35% fail on Rbt (sp)
  • 3.1% fail on Tyres (29% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Condition (5.2% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Tread depth (55% better than other 2016 vans)
  • 1.4% fail on Body, chassis, structure (8.0% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Transmission (140% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Drive shafts (160% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Joints (170% worse than other 2016 vans)
  • 0.70% fail on Steering (25% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.35% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.35% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.35% fail on Power steering
      • 0.35% fail on Other components
  • 0.70% fail on Suspension (79% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.35% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.35% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.35% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.35% fail on Anti-roll bar