MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Hyundai » H100 » 2001
Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Hyundai H100 MOT Results

Registered in 2001
45.8% pass rate
from 120 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2001 vans and highlighted areas where the Hyundai H100 is unusually good or bad.

  • 29% fail on Suspension
    • 16% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 9.2% fail on Spring mounting
      • 7.5% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.83% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 6.7% fail on Leaf springs (4 times worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 6.7% fail on Pins and bushes (13 times worse than other 2001 vans)
        • 6.7% fail on Shackle (17 times worse than other 2001 vans)
    • 5.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.5% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 2.5% fail on Linkage condition (4 times worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.83% fail on Attachment
    • 2.5% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 2.5% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.5% fail on Condition
    • 1.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.83% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.83% fail on Front
  • 27% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 12% fail on Rear fog lamp (170% worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 12% fail on Fog lamp (180% worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Tell tale (10 times worse than other 2001 vans)
    • 5.8% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 5.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 5.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 4.2% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.83% fail on Side repeaters
    • 4.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.7% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.83% fail on Rear lamps
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.5% fail on Horn
    • 0.83% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 19% fail on Brakes
    • 13% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 13% fail on Components
        • 10% fail on Pipes
        • 3.3% fail on Valves
        • 0.83% fail on Reservoirs
      • 1.7% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (5 times worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.83% fail on Leaks
    • 9.2% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.8% fail on Rear wheels
      • 2.5% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
    • 0.83% fail on Hub components
      • 0.83% fail on Brake pads
  • 18% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 11% fail on Washers (140% worse than other 2001 vans)
    • 10% fail on Wipers
    • 0.83% fail on Windscreen
  • 13% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 6.7% fail on Body condition
    • 4.2% fail on Seats (5 times worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 3.3% fail on Passengers (17 times worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.83% fail on Drivers
    • 0.83% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.83% fail on Chassis
    • 0.83% fail on Doors
      • 0.83% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.83% fail on Spare wheel
  • 7.5% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 2.5% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.5% fail on Emissions
    • 2.5% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.7% fail on Tank
      • 0.83% fail on Pipe
    • 0.83% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 6.7% fail on Tyres
    • 5.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.7% fail on Condition
    • 0.83% fail on Valve stem
  • 4.2% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 4.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.5% fail on Condition
      • 1.7% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 3.3% fail on Steering
    • 2.5% fail on Steering system
      • 2.5% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.83% fail on Locking devices
  • 0.83% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.83% fail on Attachment