Hyundai iLoad MOT Results
Registered in 200953.2% pass rate
from 156 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 vans and highlighted areas where the Hyundai iLoad is unusually good or bad.
-
25% fail on
Suspension
-
12% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(89% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 6.4% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 4.5% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 1.9% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.64% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.64% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
-
9.6% fail on
Springs
(96% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
9.6% fail on
Leaf springs
(3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 9.0% fail on Leaf spring (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.64% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
-
9.6% fail on
Leaf springs
(3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
-
7.1% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.8% fail on Ball joint
- 2.6% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.64% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
1.3% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.64% fail on Ball joint
- 0.64% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.64% fail on Wheel bearings
-
12% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(89% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
22% fail on
Brakes
-
16% fail on
Brake performance
(86% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
12% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(110% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 12% fail on Rbt (sp) (120% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
6.4% fail on
Parking brake performance
(190% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
6.4% fail on
Rbt
(2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 5.8% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.64% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
6.4% fail on
Rbt
(2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
-
3.8% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.2% fail on
Rbt
- 3.2% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.64% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.64% fail on Service brake performance
-
3.2% fail on
Rbt
-
1.3% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
1.3% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
1.3% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.64% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
12% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(110% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
6.4% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
6.4% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(130% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 6.4% fail on Brake pads (130% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
1.9% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.9% fail on Brake discs
-
6.4% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(130% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 3.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
1.3% fail on
Parking brake control
- 1.3% fail on Lever
-
1.3% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 1.3% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
16% fail on
Brake performance
(86% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
21% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
6.4% fail on
Headlamps
- 5.8% fail on Headlamp
- 0.64% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 5.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
4.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim
- 4.5% fail on Rear reflectors (10 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 2.6% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.6% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.6% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.9% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.64% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
2.6% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.9% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.9% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.9% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
6.4% fail on
Headlamps
-
6.4% fail on
Steering
-
3.2% fail on
Steering gear
(4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 3.2% fail on Steering rack (5 times worse than other 2009 vans)
-
3.2% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 3.2% fail on Track rod end
-
0.64% fail on
Steering play
- 0.64% fail on Steering rack
-
3.2% fail on
Steering gear
(4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
-
5.8% fail on
Tyres
- 3.8% fail on Tread depth
- 2.6% fail on Condition
-
5.1% fail on
Visibility
- 3.2% fail on Washers
- 2.6% fail on Wipers
-
2.6% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(72% better than other 2009 vans)
-
1.3% fail on
Transmission
-
1.3% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.64% fail on Flexible couplings
- 0.64% fail on Bearing housing
-
1.3% fail on
Prop shafts
-
1.3% fail on
Body
- 0.64% fail on Panel
- 0.64% fail on Other body component
- 0.64% fail on Bumpers
-
1.3% fail on
Transmission
-
0.64% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.64% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.64% fail on Condition
-
0.64% fail on
Seat belts