MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Hyundai » iLoad » 2010

Hyundai iLoad MOT Results

Registered in 2010
58.1% pass rate
from 296 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Hyundai iLoad is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Brakes
    • 16% fail on Brake performance (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 11% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 11% fail on Rbt (sp) (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.34% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 6.8% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 6.8% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 6.1% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.68% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.34% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.34% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 4.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.1% fail on Rbt
          • 3.0% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.7% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 2.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.4% fail on Parking brake control (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Lever (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.0% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.0% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.34% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.34% fail on Lever
    • 2.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.4% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.4% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.34% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.68% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.34% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.34% fail on Hand lever
  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.34% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.34% fail on Dipswitch
    • 1.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.0% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.68% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 1.0% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.0% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.34% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.34% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 10% fail on Suspension (41% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.4% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.68% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 3.0% fail on Springs
      • 3.0% fail on Leaf springs
        • 2.7% fail on Leaf spring
        • 0.34% fail on Anchor bracket
    • 2.7% fail on Anti-roll bars (56% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.68% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.34% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.34% fail on Linkage
      • 0.34% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.34% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.34% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.34% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.34% fail on Ball joint
  • 7.8% fail on Tyres
    • 3.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.4% fail on Condition
    • 1.0% fail on Size/type (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
  • 6.1% fail on Visibility
    • 2.7% fail on Washers
    • 2.0% fail on Wipers
    • 0.68% fail on View to rear
      • 0.68% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.34% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.34% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.34% fail on Windscreen
  • 5.4% fail on Steering
    • 3.7% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 3.7% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.34% fail on Other components
        • 0.34% fail on Steering linkage
    • 1.7% fail on Steering gear (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.34% fail on Power steering
      • 0.34% fail on Other components
    • 0.34% fail on Steering play
      • 0.34% fail on Steering rack
  • 3.0% fail on Body, chassis, structure (62% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Transmission
      • 1.7% fail on Prop shafts (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.68% fail on Prop shaft
        • 0.34% fail on Joints
        • 0.34% fail on Flexible couplings
        • 0.34% fail on Bearing housing
    • 0.68% fail on Body
      • 0.68% fail on Other body component
    • 0.68% fail on Doors
      • 0.68% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.68% fail on Door condition
    • 0.34% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.34% fail on Bumpers
  • 1.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.34% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 1.0% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.68% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (89% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.34% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.34% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.34% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
    • 0.34% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.34% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 0.34% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.34% fail on Attachment