MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Hyundai » iLoad » 2012

Hyundai iLoad MOT Results

Registered in 2012
58.7% pass rate
from 310 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 vans and highlighted areas where the Hyundai iLoad is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Brakes (62% worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 13% fail on Brake performance (110% worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 8.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (91% worse than other 2012 vans)
        • 8.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (94% worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 4.5% fail on Service brake performance (140% worse than other 2012 vans)
        • 4.5% fail on Rbt (150% worse than other 2012 vans)
          • 4.2% fail on Service brake performance (190% worse than other 2012 vans)
          • 0.32% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 4.2% fail on Parking brake performance (170% worse than other 2012 vans)
        • 4.2% fail on Rbt (180% worse than other 2012 vans)
          • 3.9% fail on Parking brake performance (190% worse than other 2012 vans)
          • 0.32% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 1.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.97% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.65% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 5.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 4.2% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 4.2% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.6% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.6% fail on Brake discs
    • 3.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.3% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.3% fail on Lever
    • 0.97% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.97% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.65% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.32% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.32% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.32% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.32% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.32% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.32% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.32% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.32% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.2% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.3% fail on Rear reflectors (7 times worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Stop lamp (65% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.65% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.65% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.65% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.32% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.32% fail on Horn
    • 0.32% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.32% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.32% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.32% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 11% fail on Suspension
    • 5.5% fail on Springs
      • 5.5% fail on Leaf springs (6 times worse than other 2012 vans)
        • 4.8% fail on Leaf spring (8 times worse than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.32% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
        • 0.32% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
    • 3.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.3% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.65% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.65% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.97% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.65% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.32% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.32% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.65% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.32% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.32% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.32% fail on Wheel bearings
  • 7.7% fail on Visibility
    • 4.5% fail on Washers
    • 3.5% fail on Wipers
    • 0.32% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.32% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.32% fail on Windscreen
  • 6.1% fail on Tyres
    • 3.2% fail on Condition
    • 2.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.65% fail on Size/type
  • 1.6% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plates
  • 1.6% fail on Steering
    • 0.97% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.97% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.65% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.65% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.32% fail on Steering play
      • 0.32% fail on Steering rack
  • 1.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (66% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Exhaust emissions (71% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.65% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.32% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.32% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve
        • 0.32% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.32% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
      • 0.32% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.32% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.32% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.32% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.32% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 1.3% fail on Body, chassis, structure (80% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.32% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.32% fail on Transmission
      • 0.32% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.32% fail on Prop shaft
    • 0.32% fail on Load security
      • 0.32% fail on Loading door
    • 0.32% fail on Seats
      • 0.32% fail on Driver's seat
  • 0.65% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.65% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.32% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.32% fail on Requirements
  • 0.65% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.65% fail on Attachment