Isuzu D-Max MOT Results

Registered in 2017
79.7% pass rate
from 4,956 tests in 2021
(17% better than other 2017 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 vans and highlighted areas where the Isuzu D-Max is unusually good or bad.

  • 7.6% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 3.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (4 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 3.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (4 times worse than other 2017 vans)
        • 3.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (4 times worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim (46% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim (42% better than other 2017 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.81% fail on Stop lamp (50% better than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.52% fail on Direction indicators (57% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Flashing type (57% better than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.28% fail on Side repeaters (67% better than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.24% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.52% fail on Reversing lamps (2 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Reversing lamps (2 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.020% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 0.42% fail on Headlamps (77% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Headlamp (78% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.040% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.020% fail on Dipswitch
    • 0.32% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.28% fail on Trailer electrical socket (2 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.020% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.020% fail on Horn
    • 0.30% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.30% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.22% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (13 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (13 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.020% fail on Main beam tell-tale
    • 0.16% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.020% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.020% fail on Switch
  • 4.6% fail on Brakes (17% better than other 2017 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Mechanical brake components (42% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Brake linings and pads (37% better than other 2017 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Brake pads (38% better than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.061% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.24% fail on Brake discs and drums (66% better than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.24% fail on Brake discs (65% better than other 2017 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Brake performance (32% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.79% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.79% fail on Rbt
          • 0.54% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.26% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.40% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (67% better than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.32% fail on Rbt (sp) (73% better than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.081% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (4 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.28% fail on Rbt
          • 0.24% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.020% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.020% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.10% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.10% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.081% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.061% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.040% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.020% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
    • 1.0% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (2 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.81% fail on Electronic stability control (3 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.50% fail on Anti-lock braking system (130% worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.36% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.26% fail on Pedal
      • 0.12% fail on Hand lever (200% worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.28% fail on Rigid brake pipes (150% worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.20% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.20% fail on Lever
    • 0.14% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.040% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.040% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.020% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.020% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 4.4% fail on Visibility
    • 3.2% fail on Wipers
    • 1.3% fail on Washers (31% better than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.18% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.020% fail on View to rear
      • 0.020% fail on Mirrors
  • 3.3% fail on Suspension
    • 1.6% fail on Anti-roll bars (110% worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Pins and bushes (8 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.061% fail on Linkage ball joints (80% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.020% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.020% fail on Linkage
    • 0.99% fail on Wheel bearings (4 times worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.63% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.48% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.10% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.020% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.020% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.38% fail on Springs (58% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Leaf springs (130% worse than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.16% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (17 times worse than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Leaf spring
      • 0.10% fail on Coil springs (87% better than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.10% fail on Coil spring (87% better than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.20% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.16% fail on Pins and bushes (19 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.040% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.040% fail on Shock absorbers (88% better than other 2017 vans)
  • 2.7% fail on Tyres (35% better than other 2017 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Tread depth (29% better than other 2017 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Condition (38% better than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.020% fail on Size/type
  • 1.4% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.46% fail on Exhaust system (180% worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.28% fail on Transmission (54% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Drive shafts (61% better than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.20% fail on Joints (63% better than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.020% fail on Bearing housing
      • 0.061% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.040% fail on Joints
        • 0.020% fail on Prop shaft
    • 0.22% fail on Body
      • 0.20% fail on Other body component
      • 0.020% fail on Panel
    • 0.18% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.10% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.10% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.081% fail on Towbar (5 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.061% fail on Other towbar components (8 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.020% fail on Towbar condition
      • 0.020% fail on Safety device
    • 0.040% fail on Cabs (22 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.040% fail on Steps (33 times worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.020% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.020% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.020% fail on Undertray
  • 1.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (45% better than other 2017 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Exhaust emissions (44% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Compression ignition (39% better than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.87% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (44% better than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.10% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.10% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.020% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 0.26% fail on Spark ignition (58% better than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.26% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (56% better than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.020% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.020% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 0.81% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.59% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.20% fail on Seat belts (60% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Condition (56% better than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.020% fail on Airbags
      • 0.020% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.67% fail on Identification of the vehicle (130% worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.67% fail on Registration plates (130% worse than other 2017 vans)
  • 0.36% fail on Road Wheels (160% worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.36% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 2017 vans)
  • 0.20% fail on Steering (68% better than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Steering linkage components (56% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Track rod end (63% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.020% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.020% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.020% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.020% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.020% fail on Power steering
      • 0.020% fail on Operation