Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Isuzu Grafter MOT Results

Registered in 2010
58.3% pass rate
from 60 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Isuzu Grafter is unusually good or bad.

  • 32% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 8.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 8.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 6.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 6.7% fail on Headlamp
    • 6.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 6.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 5.0% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.7% fail on Side repeaters
    • 5.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 5.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 5.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.0% fail on Position lamp
    • 5.0% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 5.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 5.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.7% fail on Outline marker lamps
      • 1.7% fail on Outline marker lamp
  • 17% fail on Visibility
    • 12% fail on Washers (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.0% fail on Wipers
    • 1.7% fail on Condition of glass
      • 1.7% fail on Windscreen
    • 1.7% fail on View to rear
      • 1.7% fail on Mirrors
  • 15% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 15% fail on Exhaust emissions (180% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 12% fail on Compression ignition (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 10% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 1.7% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 5.0% fail on Spark ignition (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 5.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
  • 10% fail on Brakes
    • 5.0% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.7% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 1.7% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.7% fail on Lever
    • 1.7% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 1.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.7% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.7% fail on Brake pads
  • 8.3% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 6.7% fail on Exhaust system (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Towbar
      • 1.7% fail on Other towbar components
  • 8.3% fail on Tyres
    • 5.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.3% fail on Condition
  • 6.7% fail on Suspension
    • 5.0% fail on Axles (95 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.3% fail on King pins (1279 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Axle
    • 1.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint
  • 3.3% fail on Steering
    • 1.7% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.7% fail on Steering box
    • 1.7% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.7% fail on Drag link end
  • 1.7% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plates