Isuzu Grafter MOT Results

Registered in 2015
68.8% pass rate
from 337 tests in 2020
(28% worse than other 2015 vans)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2015 vans and highlighted areas where the Isuzu Grafter is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (55% worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 6.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (2 times worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 4.5% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (5 times worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 4.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (5 times worse than other 2015 vans)
        • 4.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (5 times worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.7% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.30% fail on All position lamps
    • 3.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.4% fail on Individual direction indicators (4 times worse than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.59% fail on Side repeaters
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.8% fail on Outline marker lamps (7 times worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Outline marker lamp (6 times worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on All outline marker lamps
    • 1.2% fail on Electrical equipment (2 times worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.89% fail on Trailer electrical socket (8 times worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Horn
    • 0.59% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.59% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.30% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.30% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.30% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.30% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 8.3% fail on Visibility
    • 3.9% fail on Wipers
    • 3.9% fail on Washers
    • 0.89% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.89% fail on Windscreen
  • 8.3% fail on Tyres (98% worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 5.0% fail on Condition (150% worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.30% fail on Size/type
  • 5.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (2 times worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 5.9% fail on Exhaust emissions (3 times worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 4.2% fail on Compression ignition (2 times worse than other 2015 vans)
        • 3.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2015 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (3 times worse than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.30% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.30% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
      • 2.1% fail on Spark ignition (5 times worse than other 2015 vans)
        • 2.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (5 times worse than other 2015 vans)
  • 5.6% fail on Brakes
    • 3.0% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (6 times worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Electronic stability control (9 times worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 2.4% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.89% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.89% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.59% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.59% fail on Rbt
          • 0.59% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.59% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.30% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.30% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.30% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.30% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.30% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.30% fail on Rbt
          • 0.30% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
    • 0.89% fail on Mechanical brake components (73% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Brake linings and pads (79% better than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.59% fail on Brake pads (79% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.30% fail on Lever
    • 0.30% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.30% fail on Lever
  • 2.7% fail on Suspension
    • 0.89% fail on Axles (116 times worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.89% fail on King pins (1016 times worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.59% fail on Springs
      • 0.59% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.30% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
        • 0.30% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
    • 0.59% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.59% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.59% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.59% fail on Ball joint (5 times worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.30% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 2.4% fail on Identification of the vehicle (5 times worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Registration plates (5 times worse than other 2015 vans)
  • 2.4% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.59% fail on Drag link end (58 times worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.30% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.30% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.59% fail on Steering gear (10 times worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Operation (40 times worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.30% fail on Steering play
      • 0.30% fail on Steering box
  • 0.89% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.59% fail on Body
      • 0.30% fail on Mounting fixings
      • 0.30% fail on Other body component
    • 0.30% fail on Towbar
      • 0.30% fail on Other towbar components
  • 0.30% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.30% fail on Attachment