Isuzu Grafter MOT Results

Registered in 2016
67.2% pass rate
from 320 tests in 2020
(42% worse than other 2016 vans)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 vans and highlighted areas where the Isuzu Grafter is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (110% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 8.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim (59% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim (68% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 3.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 3.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Position lamps (10 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Position lamp (10 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Stop lamp (27% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Direction indicators (28% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Flashing type (28% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Individual direction indicators (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.31% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.63% fail on Headlamps (63% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.63% fail on Headlamp (62% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.63% fail on Electrical equipment (130% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.31% fail on Horn
    • 0.31% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.31% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 7.5% fail on Brakes (28% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (11 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 3.4% fail on Electronic stability control (15 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.94% fail on Anti-lock braking system (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Brake performance (5.7% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (24% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (26% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.31% fail on Rbt
          • 0.31% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.31% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.94% fail on Parking brake control (190% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.94% fail on Lever (190% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.94% fail on Mechanical brake components (71% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.94% fail on Brake linings and pads (67% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.94% fail on Brake pads (67% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.31% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 7.2% fail on Visibility (43% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 5.0% fail on Washers (170% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Wipers (29% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.63% fail on Condition of glass (69% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.63% fail on Windscreen (70% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.31% fail on Driver's view
  • 5.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 5.3% fail on Exhaust emissions (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 3.8% fail on Compression ignition (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 3.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.63% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (200% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Spark ignition (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.31% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.31% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 4.4% fail on Tyres (0.58% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Tread depth (7.9% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Condition (15% better than other 2016 vans)
  • 2.2% fail on Suspension (33% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.94% fail on Springs (2.3% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.94% fail on Leaf springs (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.94% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (111 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.63% fail on Axles (83 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on King pins
      • 0.31% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.63% fail on Suspension arms (19% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.63% fail on Ball joint (49% worse than other 2016 vans)
  • 1.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure (24% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.94% fail on Body (200% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.94% fail on Other body component (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.63% fail on Towbar (37 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Towbar condition
      • 0.31% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.31% fail on Load security
      • 0.31% fail on Tailgate
  • 1.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (64% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.63% fail on Seat belts (21% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.63% fail on Condition (30% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.63% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (160% worse than other 2016 vans)
  • 0.94% fail on Steering (68% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.31% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.31% fail on Operation
    • 0.31% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.31% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.31% fail on Power steering
      • 0.31% fail on Operation
  • 0.63% fail on Identification of the vehicle (120% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.63% fail on Registration plates (120% worse than other 2016 vans)
  • 0.63% fail on Road Wheels (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.63% fail on Attachment (6 times worse than other 2016 vans)