Isuzu Grafter MOT Results

Registered in 2017
71.8% pass rate
from 348 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 vans and highlighted areas where the Isuzu Grafter is unusually good or bad.

  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (64% worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 5.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (2 times worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (5 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 3.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (5 times worse than other 2017 vans)
        • 3.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (5 times worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.29% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.1% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.1% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.86% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.29% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.86% fail on Reversing lamps (4 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.86% fail on Reversing lamps (4 times worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.57% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.57% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.57% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.57% fail on Position lamp
  • 8.9% fail on Visibility (81% worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 5.5% fail on Washers (200% worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Wipers
    • 0.86% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.86% fail on Windscreen
  • 7.8% fail on Brakes
    • 4.6% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (14 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 4.3% fail on Electronic stability control (23 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 2.3% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.86% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.86% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.86% fail on Service brake imbalance (7 times worse than other 2017 vans)
          • 0.29% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.29% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.29% fail on Rbt
          • 0.29% fail on Service brake performance
    • 0.86% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.57% fail on Brake linings and pads (78% better than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.57% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.29% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.29% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.57% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.57% fail on Lever
    • 0.29% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 6.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (150% worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 6.3% fail on Exhaust emissions (160% worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 4.9% fail on Compression ignition (170% worse than other 2017 vans)
        • 4.9% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.57% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 1.4% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 5.5% fail on Tyres
    • 4.3% fail on Tread depth (110% worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Condition
  • 1.1% fail on Identification of the vehicle (2 times worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plates (2 times worse than other 2017 vans)
  • 1.1% fail on Suspension
    • 0.57% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.57% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.29% fail on Springs
      • 0.29% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.29% fail on Leaf spring
    • 0.29% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 0.86% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.86% fail on Body
      • 0.29% fail on Mounting fixings
      • 0.29% fail on Panel
      • 0.29% fail on Other body component
  • 0.29% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.29% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.29% fail on Condition