Isuzu Grafter MOT Results
Registered in 201771.8% pass rate
from 348 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 vans and highlighted areas where the Isuzu Grafter is unusually good or bad.
-
14% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(64% worse than other 2017 vans)
- 5.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (2 times worse than other 2017 vans)
-
3.7% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(5 times worse than other 2017 vans)
-
3.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(5 times worse than other 2017 vans)
- 3.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (5 times worse than other 2017 vans)
-
3.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(5 times worse than other 2017 vans)
-
2.6% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.29% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 2.0% fail on Stop lamp
-
1.1% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.1% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.86% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.29% fail on Side repeaters
-
1.1% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.86% fail on
Reversing lamps
(4 times worse than other 2017 vans)
- 0.86% fail on Reversing lamps (4 times worse than other 2017 vans)
-
0.57% fail on
Headlamps
- 0.57% fail on Headlamp
-
0.57% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.57% fail on Position lamp
-
8.9% fail on
Visibility
(81% worse than other 2017 vans)
- 5.5% fail on Washers (200% worse than other 2017 vans)
- 3.4% fail on Wipers
-
0.86% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.86% fail on Windscreen
-
7.8% fail on
Brakes
-
4.6% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(14 times worse than other 2017 vans)
- 4.3% fail on Electronic stability control (23 times worse than other 2017 vans)
- 0.29% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
2.3% fail on
Brake performance
-
1.4% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 1.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
0.86% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.86% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.86% fail on Service brake imbalance (7 times worse than other 2017 vans)
- 0.29% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.86% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.29% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.29% fail on
Rbt
- 0.29% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.29% fail on
Rbt
-
1.4% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
-
0.86% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
0.57% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(78% better than other 2017 vans)
- 0.57% fail on Brake pads
-
0.29% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.29% fail on Brake discs
-
0.57% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(78% better than other 2017 vans)
-
0.57% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.57% fail on Lever
- 0.29% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
4.6% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(14 times worse than other 2017 vans)
-
6.3% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(150% worse than other 2017 vans)
-
6.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(160% worse than other 2017 vans)
-
4.9% fail on
Compression ignition
(170% worse than other 2017 vans)
- 4.9% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2017 vans)
- 0.57% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
-
1.4% fail on
Spark ignition
- 1.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
4.9% fail on
Compression ignition
(170% worse than other 2017 vans)
-
6.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(160% worse than other 2017 vans)
-
5.5% fail on
Tyres
- 4.3% fail on Tread depth (110% worse than other 2017 vans)
- 1.7% fail on Condition
-
1.1% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(2 times worse than other 2017 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Registration plates (2 times worse than other 2017 vans)
-
1.1% fail on
Suspension
-
0.57% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.57% fail on Ball joint
-
0.29% fail on
Springs
-
0.29% fail on
Leaf springs
- 0.29% fail on Leaf spring
-
0.29% fail on
Leaf springs
- 0.29% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.57% fail on
Suspension arms
-
0.86% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
0.86% fail on
Body
- 0.29% fail on Mounting fixings
- 0.29% fail on Panel
- 0.29% fail on Other body component
-
0.86% fail on
Body
-
0.29% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.29% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.29% fail on Condition
-
0.29% fail on
Seat belts