Isuzu Rodeo MOT Results

Registered in 2005
55.4% pass rate
from 1,058 tests in 2020
(8.8% better than other 2005 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 vans and highlighted areas where the Isuzu Rodeo is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 16% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 15% fail on Rear fog lamp (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 15% fail on Rear fog lamp (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.095% fail on Front fog lamps
        • 0.095% fail on Front fog lamps
    • 5.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.8% fail on Position lamp
    • 3.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim (59% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim (58% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.095% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.7% fail on Direction indicators (51% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Flashing type (51% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.28% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.4% fail on Headlamps (65% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp (63% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Electrical equipment (54% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.38% fail on Horn (77% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.19% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.28% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.28% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.28% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 0.19% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.19% fail on Switch
  • 20% fail on Suspension
    • 7.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 6.0% fail on Ball joint (44% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover (74% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.095% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 5.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 4.1% fail on Linkage ball joints (97% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.76% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.47% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.19% fail on Linkage
      • 0.095% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.095% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.095% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 4.8% fail on Springs
      • 3.8% fail on Leaf springs (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 2.3% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (8 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.95% fail on Leaf spring
        • 0.57% fail on Anchor pins and bushes (8 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.095% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
      • 1.0% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 4.1% fail on Wheel bearings (93% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (53% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Other suspension component (120% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint (180% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.095% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.4% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.095% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.095% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.095% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.095% fail on Ball joint
  • 17% fail on Brakes
    • 6.0% fail on Brake performance (43% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.0% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.9% fail on Rbt
          • 2.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.85% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.095% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.095% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 2.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (56% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 2.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (64% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.38% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (5 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.095% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
      • 0.95% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (63% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.95% fail on Rbt (sp) (63% better than other 2005 vans)
          • 0.66% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.38% fail on Service brake performance (71% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.95% fail on Parking brake performance (62% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.85% fail on Rbt (65% better than other 2005 vans)
          • 0.85% fail on Parking brake performance (60% better than other 2005 vans)
          • 0.095% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.095% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.095% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.28% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 4.7% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (160% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 4.6% fail on Anti-lock braking system (160% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.095% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 2.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.76% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.66% fail on Cable
        • 0.095% fail on Lever
      • 0.47% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.47% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.2% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 1.0% fail on Pedal
      • 0.19% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.47% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.47% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.38% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.095% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.38% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.38% fail on Lever
  • 10% fail on Body, chassis, structure (20% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 5.3% fail on Exhaust system (52% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Transmission (39% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Prop shafts (120% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.8% fail on Joints (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.095% fail on Prop shaft
      • 0.85% fail on Drive shafts (77% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.85% fail on Joints (76% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Chassis
      • 2.1% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.85% fail on Integral vehicle structure (56% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.85% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (55% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.85% fail on Body
      • 0.47% fail on Other body component
      • 0.19% fail on Mounting fixings
      • 0.19% fail on Panel
    • 0.76% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.47% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.28% fail on Tank
      • 0.19% fail on Pipe
    • 0.38% fail on Doors
      • 0.19% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.19% fail on Door condition
      • 0.19% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.095% fail on Door condition
        • 0.095% fail on Hinge
    • 0.28% fail on Cabs
      • 0.28% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.19% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.095% fail on Spare wheel condition
      • 0.095% fail on Carrier
    • 0.095% fail on Towbar
      • 0.095% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.095% fail on Load security
      • 0.095% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.095% fail on Other tailgate component
    • 0.095% fail on Seats
      • 0.095% fail on Driver's seat
  • 7.9% fail on Visibility
    • 4.2% fail on Washers
    • 3.8% fail on Wipers
    • 0.28% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.28% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.28% fail on View to rear
      • 0.28% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.095% fail on Driver's view
  • 6.3% fail on Steering
    • 6.0% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 5.7% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.28% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.095% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.28% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.28% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.19% fail on Power steering
      • 0.095% fail on Pump
      • 0.095% fail on Other components
    • 0.095% fail on Steering play
      • 0.095% fail on Steering rack
  • 4.8% fail on Tyres (29% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.4% fail on Condition (48% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.095% fail on Size/type
  • 3.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.4% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested (120% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.57% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.19% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.19% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.28% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.19% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.095% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 2.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (58% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.28% fail on Seat belts (90% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Condition
      • 0.095% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.57% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.57% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.19% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.19% fail on Attachment
  • 0.095% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.095% fail on Speedometer