Isuzu Rodeo MOT Results
Registered in 200557.0% pass rate
from 846 tests in 2021
(10% better than other 2005 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 vans and highlighted areas where the Isuzu Rodeo is unusually good or bad.
-
21% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
13% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
-
13% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 13% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
-
13% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 4.3% fail on Stop lamp
- 3.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
2.6% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
-
1.8% fail on
Direction indicators
(51% better than other 2005 vans)
-
1.8% fail on
Flashing type
(51% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.95% fail on Individual direction indicators (63% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.71% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.12% fail on All direction indicators
-
1.8% fail on
Flashing type
(51% better than other 2005 vans)
-
1.3% fail on
Position lamps
(150% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Position lamp (170% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
0.95% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.35% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.35% fail on Horn
- 0.24% fail on Battery(ies)
-
0.47% fail on
Headlamps
(88% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.35% fail on Headlamp (91% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.12% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
0.35% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.24% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
- 0.12% fail on Main beam tell-tale
-
0.24% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.24% fail on Switch
- 0.12% fail on Rear reflectors
-
13% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
-
20% fail on
Suspension
-
7.7% fail on
Suspension arms
- 5.6% fail on Ball joint
- 2.5% fail on Ball joint dust cover (100% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.12% fail on Pins and bushes
-
5.8% fail on
Springs
(49% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
4.8% fail on
Leaf springs
(4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 3.4% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (13 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.83% fail on Leaf spring
- 0.35% fail on Anchor pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.12% fail on Anchor bracket
- 0.12% fail on Shackle bracket
- 1.2% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
4.8% fail on
Leaf springs
(4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 4.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
3.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(43% better than other 2005 vans)
- 2.1% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.59% fail on Ball joint
- 0.35% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.35% fail on Linkage
- 0.35% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.12% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 3.3% fail on Wheel bearings (69% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 1.8% fail on Shock absorbers
-
1.8% fail on
Other suspension component
(130% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Ball joint (160% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.35% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.12% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.12% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.12% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
7.7% fail on
Suspension arms
-
16% fail on
Brakes
-
7.8% fail on
Brake performance
(27% better than other 2005 vans)
-
3.8% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.7% fail on
Rbt
- 2.2% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.12% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.12% fail on Service brake performance
-
3.7% fail on
Rbt
-
3.1% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(50% better than other 2005 vans)
- 2.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (58% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.47% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.12% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
-
1.4% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt
- 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.24% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt
- 1.2% fail on Brake performance not tested (180% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
0.83% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(68% better than other 2005 vans)
-
0.71% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(73% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.47% fail on Service brake imbalance (69% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.24% fail on Service brake performance (83% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.12% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.71% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(73% better than other 2005 vans)
-
3.8% fail on
Service brake performance
-
4.6% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(120% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 4.6% fail on Anti-lock braking system (130% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 4.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
2.0% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.2% fail on Brake pads
-
0.71% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.71% fail on Brake discs
-
0.47% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.47% fail on Cable
-
1.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.71% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.71% fail on Lever
-
0.59% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.59% fail on Pedal
-
0.47% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.35% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.12% fail on Servos
-
0.47% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.47% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.24% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.12% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.12% fail on Servos
-
0.12% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
-
0.12% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.12% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
-
0.12% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
7.8% fail on
Brake performance
(27% better than other 2005 vans)
-
14% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 5.8% fail on Exhaust system (78% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
3.9% fail on
Chassis
(84% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 3.9% fail on Chassis condition (85% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
2.5% fail on
Transmission
(45% better than other 2005 vans)
-
1.5% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.95% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.59% fail on Prop shaft
-
1.1% fail on
Drive shafts
(71% better than other 2005 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Joints (71% better than other 2005 vans)
-
1.5% fail on
Prop shafts
-
2.1% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 2.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.95% fail on
Body
- 0.35% fail on Other body component
- 0.24% fail on Body condition
- 0.24% fail on Panel
- 0.12% fail on Mounting fixings
-
0.71% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.59% fail on Tank
- 0.12% fail on Pipe
- 0.59% fail on Bumpers
-
0.35% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.24% fail on Carrier
- 0.12% fail on Spare wheel condition
-
0.35% fail on
Doors
-
0.24% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.12% fail on Door condition
- 0.12% fail on Hinge
-
0.12% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.12% fail on Door condition
-
0.24% fail on
Front passenger's door
-
0.35% fail on
Cabs
- 0.35% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.24% fail on
Load security
-
0.24% fail on
Tailgate
(13 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.24% fail on Tailgate condition (20 times worse than other 2005 vans)
-
0.24% fail on
Tailgate
(13 times worse than other 2005 vans)
-
0.12% fail on
Towbar
- 0.12% fail on Other towbar components
-
0.12% fail on
Seats
- 0.12% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.12% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.12% fail on Boot lid condition
-
9.5% fail on
Visibility
- 5.9% fail on Washers
- 3.8% fail on Wipers
-
0.35% fail on
View to rear
- 0.35% fail on Mirrors
-
0.24% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.24% fail on Windscreen
- 0.12% fail on Driver's view
-
5.9% fail on
Steering
-
4.6% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 4.4% fail on Track rod end
- 0.35% fail on Ball joint
- 0.12% fail on Drag link end
-
0.71% fail on
Power steering
- 0.47% fail on Operation
- 0.12% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.12% fail on Other components
-
0.47% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.47% fail on Steering rack
-
0.35% fail on
Steering play
- 0.35% fail on Steering rack
-
0.12% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.12% fail on Flexible coupling
-
4.6% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
4.4% fail on
Tyres
- 3.2% fail on Tread depth
- 1.4% fail on Condition
- 0.12% fail on Size/type
-
4.3% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
4.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
3.8% fail on
Compression ignition
- 2.0% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.35% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.24% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.12% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.12% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve
-
0.35% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.35% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
3.8% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.12% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.12% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
4.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.83% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(82% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.83% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.12% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.12% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.59% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.59% fail on Registration plates
-
0.12% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.12% fail on Attachment