Isuzu Rodeo MOT Results

Registered in 2005
53.9% pass rate
from 1,103 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 vans and highlighted areas where the Isuzu Rodeo is unusually good or bad.

  • 29% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 16% fail on Rear fog lamp (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 16% fail on Fog lamp (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Tell tale
    • 8.1% fail on Registration plate lamp (24% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 6.1% fail on Position lamps (28% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 4.3% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.8% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.091% fail on Switch
    • 6.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim (54% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Direction indicators (41% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Flashing type (41% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Individual lamps (55% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.73% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.27% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.091% fail on Tell tales
        • 0.091% fail on Switch
    • 1.3% fail on Headlamps (66% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp (70% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.091% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.091% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
      • 0.091% fail on Switch
    • 1.00% fail on Horn
    • 0.82% fail on Trailer electrical socket (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.82% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.27% fail on Battery (78% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.27% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.091% fail on Lamp
      • 0.091% fail on Switch
      • 0.091% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.091% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 19% fail on Suspension (19% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 5.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 4.4% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.91% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.54% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.091% fail on Attachment
    • 5.3% fail on Leaf springs (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 4.1% fail on Pins and bushes (10 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 3.8% fail on Shackle (11 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.27% fail on Anchor (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Condition (170% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.091% fail on Spring eye
      • 0.091% fail on Anchor bracket
      • 0.091% fail on Securing bolts
    • 3.8% fail on Wheel bearings (70% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.7% fail on Front (110% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.091% fail on Rear
    • 3.7% fail on Front suspension joints (56% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Shock absorbers (93% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.7% fail on Condition (93% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Suspension arms (50% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (49% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Prescribed areas (78% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.82% fail on Spring mounting (68% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Component mounting (90% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.00% fail on Drive shafts (74% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.82% fail on Front drive shafts (78% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.73% fail on Constant velocity joints (80% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.091% fail on Couplings
      • 0.18% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.18% fail on Universal joint (7 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.18% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.091% fail on General condition
  • 17% fail on Brakes
    • 7.4% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 6.5% fail on Components
        • 5.7% fail on Pipes
        • 0.73% fail on Hoses
        • 0.18% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.091% fail on Cylinders
      • 0.73% fail on Leaks
      • 0.36% fail on Operation
      • 0.27% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 6.5% fail on Brake performance (38% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Parking brake performance (56% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Rear wheels (56% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.91% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.63% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.18% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.091% fail on Parking brake operation
      • 0.091% fail on Brake operation
    • 4.4% fail on ABS (190% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Hub components
      • 1.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.27% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.27% fail on Brake calipers
    • 0.91% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.91% fail on Pedal
        • 0.54% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.36% fail on Condition
    • 0.45% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.45% fail on Condition
    • 0.45% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.36% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.36% fail on Cable
  • 9.4% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.0% fail on Wipers
    • 3.5% fail on Washers
    • 0.82% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.45% fail on Mirrors
  • 7.1% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 6.2% fail on Exhaust system (70% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.00% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.54% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.27% fail on Tank
      • 0.18% fail on Cap
      • 0.091% fail on Pipe
    • 0.36% fail on Emissions (71% better than other 2005 vans)
  • 6.2% fail on Tyres
    • 4.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.6% fail on Condition (52% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.36% fail on Size/type
    • 0.36% fail on Valve stem
  • 4.4% fail on Steering (31% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Steering system (37% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.45% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.36% fail on Free play
        • 0.36% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.36% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.091% fail on Other components
        • 0.091% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 0.73% fail on Steering control (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.73% fail on Steering coupling (9 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.73% fail on Universal joint (9 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.27% fail on Power steering
      • 0.091% fail on Operation
      • 0.091% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.091% fail on Other components
    • 0.18% fail on Steering operation
  • 4.4% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 2.4% fail on Body condition
    • 1.1% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.1% fail on Chassis
    • 0.54% fail on Doors
      • 0.27% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.18% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.091% fail on Drivers
    • 0.27% fail on Spare wheel
    • 0.18% fail on Body security
    • 0.091% fail on Load security
      • 0.091% fail on Tailgate
  • 1.5% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (68% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 1.2% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
    • 0.36% fail on Seat belts (88% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Condition
      • 0.091% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 1.4% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plate