MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Isuzu » Rodeo » 2006

Isuzu Rodeo MOT Results

Registered in 2006
56.4% pass rate
from 1,088 tests in 2020
(11% better than other 2006 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2006 vans and highlighted areas where the Isuzu Rodeo is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 12% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (3 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 12% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 12% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 0.28% fail on Switch
    • 8.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (41% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim (52% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim (49% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Position lamps (48% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Position lamp (49% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.092% fail on All position lamps
    • 1.7% fail on Direction indicators (44% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Flashing type (44% better than other 2006 vans)
        • 0.92% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.64% fail on Individual direction indicators (71% better than other 2006 vans)
        • 0.092% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.92% fail on Headlamps (76% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.74% fail on Headlamp (80% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.92% fail on Electrical equipment (54% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.46% fail on Horn (66% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.092% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.092% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.37% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.18% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.18% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 0.092% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.092% fail on Switch
  • 20% fail on Suspension
    • 7.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 6.2% fail on Ball joint (46% worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.092% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 6.5% fail on Springs (72% worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 6.0% fail on Leaf springs (4 times worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 3.7% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (16 times worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 1.9% fail on Leaf spring (170% worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 0.28% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
        • 0.18% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
        • 0.092% fail on Spring saddle
        • 0.092% fail on Shackle bracket
      • 0.92% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 4.6% fail on Anti-roll bars (33% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 2.8% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.74% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.55% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.46% fail on Linkage
      • 0.18% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.092% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 3.1% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 2.4% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (58% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.92% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.55% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.092% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 17% fail on Brakes
    • 7.0% fail on Brake performance (31% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 3.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.6% fail on Rbt
          • 2.5% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.092% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.092% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (51% better than other 2006 vans)
        • 2.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (58% better than other 2006 vans)
        • 0.46% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (7 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt
          • 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.092% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.092% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.092% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.092% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 1.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (52% better than other 2006 vans)
          • 0.74% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.28% fail on Service brake performance (74% better than other 2006 vans)
        • 0.18% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (11 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 4.6% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (170% worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 4.6% fail on Anti-lock braking system (190% worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Mechanical brake components (44% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.55% fail on Brake discs and drums (62% better than other 2006 vans)
        • 0.55% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.37% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.37% fail on Cable
    • 1.4% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 1.2% fail on Pedal (130% worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.46% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.46% fail on Lever
    • 0.46% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.37% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.092% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.37% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.18% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.092% fail on Servos
      • 0.092% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.37% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.092% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.092% fail on Servos
    • 0.092% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.092% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.092% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.092% fail on Other braking system component
  • 14% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 5.6% fail on Exhaust system (93% worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Transmission
      • 3.3% fail on Prop shafts (2 times worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 2.8% fail on Joints (7 times worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 0.46% fail on Prop shaft
        • 0.092% fail on Bearing housing
      • 0.64% fail on Drive shafts (83% better than other 2006 vans)
        • 0.64% fail on Joints (83% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Chassis
      • 1.9% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.3% fail on Bumpers (2 times worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Body
      • 1.0% fail on Other body component (120% worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Mounting fixings
      • 0.092% fail on Panel
    • 0.64% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.64% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.28% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.18% fail on Tank
      • 0.092% fail on Pipe
    • 0.28% fail on Towbar
      • 0.18% fail on Other towbar components
      • 0.092% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.18% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.18% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.18% fail on Doors
      • 0.18% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.18% fail on Door condition
    • 0.092% fail on Load security
      • 0.092% fail on Loading door
    • 0.092% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.092% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 7.4% fail on Visibility (26% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on Wipers
    • 3.7% fail on Washers
    • 0.37% fail on View to rear
      • 0.37% fail on Mirrors
  • 5.1% fail on Steering
    • 4.2% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 3.7% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.46% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.092% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.092% fail on Other components
        • 0.092% fail on Steering linkage
      • 0.092% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.28% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.28% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.28% fail on Steering coupling (5 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Universal joint (5 times worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Power steering
      • 0.18% fail on Operation
    • 0.18% fail on Steering play
      • 0.092% fail on Steering box
      • 0.092% fail on Steering rack
  • 4.8% fail on Tyres (30% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.4% fail on Condition (51% better than other 2006 vans)
  • 4.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.4% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.8% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 1.0% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.28% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.18% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.092% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.092% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.092% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
      • 0.18% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.18% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.55% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.37% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.092% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.092% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 2.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (50% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.74% fail on Seat belts (73% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.37% fail on Prescribed areas (80% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.37% fail on Condition
    • 0.092% fail on Airbags
      • 0.092% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.55% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.55% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.092% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.092% fail on Condition