Isuzu Rodeo MOT Results

Registered in 2006
57.2% pass rate
from 1,082 tests in 2017
(12% better than other 2006 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2006 vans and highlighted areas where the Isuzu Rodeo is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 13% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 13% fail on Fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.46% fail on Tell tale (2 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.092% fail on Switch
    • 8.6% fail on Registration plate lamp (22% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 7.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.1% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.3% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.18% fail on All position lamps
    • 5.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim (49% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Direction indicators (41% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Flashing type (41% better than other 2006 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.55% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.18% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.83% fail on Headlamps (76% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.83% fail on Headlamp (75% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.83% fail on Horn
    • 0.55% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.28% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.28% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.18% fail on Switch
      • 0.092% fail on Lamp
    • 0.18% fail on Battery (80% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.092% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 19% fail on Suspension
    • 6.0% fail on Leaf springs (4 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 4.3% fail on Pins and bushes (12 times worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 3.9% fail on Shackle (14 times worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 0.37% fail on Anchor (5 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Condition (170% worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Spring eye
      • 0.18% fail on Securing bolts
      • 0.092% fail on Anchor bracket
    • 5.6% fail on Shock absorbers (2 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 5.6% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 5.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.9% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.65% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.46% fail on Attachment
      • 0.092% fail on Condition
    • 4.0% fail on Front suspension joints (83% worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 3.0% fail on Front (83% worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.83% fail on Drive shafts (78% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.65% fail on Front drive shafts (83% better than other 2006 vans)
        • 0.55% fail on Constant velocity joints (85% better than other 2006 vans)
        • 0.18% fail on Couplings (5 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.18% fail on Universal joint (7 times worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.74% fail on Prescribed areas (79% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.46% fail on Component mounting (73% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Spring mounting (86% better than other 2006 vans)
  • 17% fail on Brakes
    • 7.5% fail on Brake performance (24% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 3.0% fail on Parking brake performance (48% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Rear wheels (42% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.0% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.46% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.37% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.092% fail on Brake operation
    • 6.7% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 5.6% fail on Components
        • 5.1% fail on Pipes
        • 0.37% fail on Hoses
        • 0.28% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.18% fail on Cylinders
      • 0.74% fail on Leaks
      • 0.65% fail on Operation (3 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 4.1% fail on ABS (2 times worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Hub components (51% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Brake pads (58% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.65% fail on Brake calipers (2 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.55% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.3% fail on Service brake control components
      • 1.3% fail on Pedal
        • 0.83% fail on Condition (7 times worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 0.46% fail on Anti-slip
    • 1.1% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.55% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.55% fail on Cable
    • 0.18% fail on Restricted movement
  • 8.0% fail on Driver's view of the road (26% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 5.8% fail on Wipers
    • 2.5% fail on Washers (39% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.28% fail on Windscreen (74% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.092% fail on Mirrors
  • 6.7% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 5.9% fail on Exhaust system (99% worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.83% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.46% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.37% fail on Pipe
      • 0.092% fail on Tank
    • 0.37% fail on Emissions
  • 5.1% fail on Tyres (37% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.3% fail on Condition (62% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.092% fail on Size/type
    • 0.092% fail on Valve stem
  • 3.9% fail on Steering (33% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Steering system
      • 2.5% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.55% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.55% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.28% fail on Power steering
      • 0.18% fail on Operation
      • 0.092% fail on Rams
    • 0.18% fail on Steering control
      • 0.18% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.18% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.092% fail on Steering operation
  • 2.3% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (44% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Body condition
    • 0.55% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.55% fail on Chassis
    • 0.28% fail on Doors
      • 0.18% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.092% fail on Drivers
      • 0.092% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.092% fail on Body security
  • 1.5% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (62% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 1.2% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
    • 0.28% fail on Seat belts (89% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Condition
      • 0.092% fail on Requirements
  • 0.83% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.83% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.18% fail on Towbars
    • 0.18% fail on Towbar