Isuzu Rodeo MOT Results

Registered in 2008
54.3% pass rate
from 727 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 vans and highlighted areas where the Isuzu Rodeo is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.8% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (110% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 5.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (110% worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 5.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (110% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 4.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.8% fail on Direction indicators (66% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 4.8% fail on Flashing type (66% worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 4.3% fail on Side repeaters (3 times worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.41% fail on Individual direction indicators (79% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.14% fail on All direction indicators
    • 4.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.4% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.28% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim (57% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim (57% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.1% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.41% fail on Horn
      • 0.28% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.28% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.14% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.55% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.55% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.41% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.41% fail on Switch
    • 0.28% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 20% fail on Suspension
    • 8.8% fail on Suspension arms (39% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 5.6% fail on Ball joint (63% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 3.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover (160% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 6.2% fail on Springs
      • 5.4% fail on Leaf springs (200% worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 3.7% fail on Leaf spring (170% worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (7 times worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.14% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
        • 0.14% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
      • 0.83% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 4.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.3% fail on Pins and bushes (92% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.41% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (75% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.14% fail on Linkage
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 3.0% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.4% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.55% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.41% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.14% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 15% fail on Brakes
    • 5.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 5.2% fail on Brake performance (49% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (64% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (78% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.96% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (14 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.41% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.96% fail on Brake performance not tested (190% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.83% fail on Parking brake performance (70% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.83% fail on Rbt (69% better than other 2008 vans)
          • 0.83% fail on Parking brake performance (66% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (73% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.28% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (32 times worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.14% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.14% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 2.3% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Pedal (3 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Hand lever
    • 2.3% fail on Mechanical brake components (45% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.83% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.69% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.14% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.55% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.55% fail on Cable
    • 2.3% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 2.3% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.96% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.96% fail on Lever
    • 0.28% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.14% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.14% fail on Valves
    • 0.28% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.14% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.14% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 11% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.4% fail on Transmission
      • 2.6% fail on Prop shafts (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 2.2% fail on Joints (6 times worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.41% fail on Prop shaft
      • 1.8% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.7% fail on Joints
        • 0.14% fail on Drive shaft
    • 4.1% fail on Exhaust system (79% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Chassis
      • 1.2% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.83% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.83% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.69% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.55% fail on Tank
      • 0.14% fail on Pipe
    • 0.41% fail on Body
      • 0.41% fail on Other body component
    • 0.28% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.14% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.14% fail on Carrier
    • 0.14% fail on Doors
      • 0.14% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.14% fail on Door condition
    • 0.14% fail on Cabs
      • 0.14% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 8.1% fail on Visibility
    • 4.5% fail on Wipers
    • 4.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.14% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.14% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.14% fail on View to rear
      • 0.14% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.0% fail on Tyres
    • 3.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.1% fail on Condition (58% better than other 2008 vans)
  • 3.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (42% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Exhaust emissions (39% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 2.9% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.83% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.55% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.41% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
      • 0.96% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.96% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.14% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.14% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 3.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.7% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (190% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.14% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.14% fail on Condition
  • 2.5% fail on Steering (58% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Steering linkage components (51% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Track rod end (57% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.14% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.28% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.14% fail on Operation
      • 0.14% fail on Steering rack
  • 1.8% fail on Identification of the vehicle (120% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Registration plates (120% worse than other 2008 vans)
  • 0.14% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.14% fail on Attachment