Isuzu Rodeo MOT Results
Registered in 200854.3% pass rate
from 727 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 vans and highlighted areas where the Isuzu Rodeo is unusually good or bad.
-
21% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
5.8% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(110% worse than other 2008 vans)
-
5.8% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(110% worse than other 2008 vans)
- 5.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (110% worse than other 2008 vans)
-
5.8% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(110% worse than other 2008 vans)
- 4.8% fail on Stop lamp
-
4.8% fail on
Direction indicators
(66% worse than other 2008 vans)
-
4.8% fail on
Flashing type
(66% worse than other 2008 vans)
- 4.3% fail on Side repeaters (3 times worse than other 2008 vans)
- 0.41% fail on Individual direction indicators (79% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.14% fail on All direction indicators
-
4.8% fail on
Flashing type
(66% worse than other 2008 vans)
-
4.7% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.4% fail on Headlamp
- 0.28% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 3.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.7% fail on
Headlamp aim
(57% better than other 2008 vans)
- 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim (57% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.14% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
1.1% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.41% fail on Horn
- 0.28% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.28% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.14% fail on Battery(ies)
-
0.55% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.55% fail on Position lamp
-
0.41% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.41% fail on Switch
- 0.28% fail on Rear reflectors
-
5.8% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(110% worse than other 2008 vans)
-
20% fail on
Suspension
-
8.8% fail on
Suspension arms
(39% worse than other 2008 vans)
- 5.6% fail on Ball joint (63% worse than other 2008 vans)
- 3.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover (160% worse than other 2008 vans)
-
6.2% fail on
Springs
-
5.4% fail on
Leaf springs
(200% worse than other 2008 vans)
- 3.7% fail on Leaf spring (170% worse than other 2008 vans)
- 1.5% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (7 times worse than other 2008 vans)
- 0.14% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
- 0.14% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
- 0.83% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
5.4% fail on
Leaf springs
(200% worse than other 2008 vans)
-
4.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.3% fail on Pins and bushes (92% worse than other 2008 vans)
- 2.2% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.41% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (75% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.28% fail on Ball joint
- 0.14% fail on Linkage
- 0.14% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 3.0% fail on Wheel bearings
- 1.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 1.4% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.55% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.41% fail on Ball joint
- 0.14% fail on Other suspension component
- 0.14% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
8.8% fail on
Suspension arms
(39% worse than other 2008 vans)
-
15% fail on
Brakes
- 5.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
5.2% fail on
Brake performance
(49% better than other 2008 vans)
-
2.5% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(64% better than other 2008 vans)
- 1.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (78% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.96% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (14 times worse than other 2008 vans)
-
1.5% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.5% fail on
Rbt
- 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.41% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
1.5% fail on
Rbt
- 0.96% fail on Brake performance not tested (190% worse than other 2008 vans)
-
0.83% fail on
Parking brake performance
(70% better than other 2008 vans)
-
0.83% fail on
Rbt
(69% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.83% fail on Parking brake performance (66% better than other 2008 vans)
-
0.83% fail on
Rbt
(69% better than other 2008 vans)
-
0.41% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(73% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.28% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (32 times worse than other 2008 vans)
-
0.14% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.14% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
2.5% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(64% better than other 2008 vans)
-
2.3% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
- 1.9% fail on Pedal (3 times worse than other 2008 vans)
- 0.41% fail on Hand lever
-
2.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(45% better than other 2008 vans)
-
1.4% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.4% fail on Brake pads
-
0.83% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.69% fail on Brake discs
- 0.14% fail on Brake drums
-
0.55% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.55% fail on Cable
-
1.4% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
2.3% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 2.3% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.96% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.96% fail on Lever
-
0.28% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.14% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.14% fail on Valves
- 0.28% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.14% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.14% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
11% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
4.4% fail on
Transmission
-
2.6% fail on
Prop shafts
(2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
- 2.2% fail on Joints (6 times worse than other 2008 vans)
- 0.41% fail on Prop shaft
-
1.8% fail on
Drive shafts
- 1.7% fail on Joints
- 0.14% fail on Drive shaft
-
2.6% fail on
Prop shafts
(2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
- 4.1% fail on Exhaust system (79% worse than other 2008 vans)
-
1.2% fail on
Chassis
- 1.2% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.83% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.83% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.69% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.55% fail on Tank
- 0.14% fail on Pipe
-
0.41% fail on
Body
- 0.41% fail on Other body component
- 0.28% fail on Bumpers
-
0.14% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.14% fail on Carrier
-
0.14% fail on
Doors
-
0.14% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.14% fail on Door condition
-
0.14% fail on
Front passenger's door
-
0.14% fail on
Cabs
- 0.14% fail on Prescribed areas
-
4.4% fail on
Transmission
-
8.1% fail on
Visibility
- 4.5% fail on Wipers
- 4.1% fail on Washers
-
0.14% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.14% fail on Windscreen
-
0.14% fail on
View to rear
- 0.14% fail on Mirrors
-
4.0% fail on
Tyres
- 3.0% fail on Tread depth
- 1.1% fail on Condition (58% better than other 2008 vans)
-
3.9% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(42% better than other 2008 vans)
-
3.7% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(39% better than other 2008 vans)
-
2.9% fail on
Compression ignition
- 1.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.83% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.55% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.41% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
-
0.96% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.96% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
2.9% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.14% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.14% fail on Transmission oil leaks
-
3.7% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(39% better than other 2008 vans)
-
3.7% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 3.7% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (190% worse than other 2008 vans)
-
0.14% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.14% fail on Condition
-
2.5% fail on
Steering
(58% better than other 2008 vans)
-
2.2% fail on
Steering linkage components
(51% better than other 2008 vans)
- 1.8% fail on Track rod end (57% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.41% fail on Ball joint
- 0.14% fail on Locking devices
-
0.28% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.14% fail on Operation
- 0.14% fail on Steering rack
-
2.2% fail on
Steering linkage components
(51% better than other 2008 vans)
-
1.8% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(120% worse than other 2008 vans)
- 1.8% fail on Registration plates (120% worse than other 2008 vans)
-
0.14% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.14% fail on Attachment