Isuzu Rodeo MOT Results

Registered in 2008
52.0% pass rate
from 846 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 vans and highlighted areas where the Isuzu Rodeo is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 8.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 8.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 8.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Switch
    • 5.7% fail on Headlamps (57% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 5.6% fail on Headlamp (62% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 5.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 4.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 4.0% fail on Side repeaters (3 times worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.24% fail on Individual direction indicators (88% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on All direction indicators
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (3 times worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.0% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.2% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.59% fail on Horn
      • 0.35% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.24% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.24% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.24% fail on Switch
    • 0.12% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.12% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 23% fail on Suspension (29% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 9.3% fail on Springs (130% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 9.3% fail on Leaf springs (4 times worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 6.5% fail on Leaf spring (3 times worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 3.0% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (14 times worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.35% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
        • 0.24% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
        • 0.12% fail on Shackle bracket
    • 7.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 5.9% fail on Ball joint (92% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover (120% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 5.3% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (39% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.8% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.59% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.24% fail on Linkage
      • 0.24% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (84% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.5% fail on Shock absorbers (100% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Other suspension component (170% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint (150% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.95% fail on Ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.71% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.12% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 18% fail on Brakes
    • 7.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes (77% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 6.5% fail on Brake performance (32% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 3.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (44% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 3.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (52% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.35% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (6 times worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
        • 0.12% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
      • 3.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.4% fail on Rbt
          • 2.1% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake imbalance (110% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt
          • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.12% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.12% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.12% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.71% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.59% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.47% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.12% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.12% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.24% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.3% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (160% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 3.3% fail on Anti-lock braking system (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (3 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Pedal (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Hand lever (4 times worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Parking brake control (150% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Lever (150% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Mechanical brake components (66% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Brake linings and pads (67% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Brake pads (67% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Brake discs and drums (65% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.59% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.35% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.24% fail on Cable
        • 0.12% fail on Lever
    • 0.71% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.24% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.12% fail on Master cylinder
      • 0.12% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.12% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.12% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 9.3% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.9% fail on Transmission
      • 2.4% fail on Drive shafts
        • 2.4% fail on Joints
      • 1.8% fail on Prop shafts (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Joints (5 times worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.24% fail on Prop shaft
    • 3.5% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.95% fail on Chassis
      • 0.95% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.95% fail on Body
      • 0.83% fail on Other body component
      • 0.12% fail on Panel
    • 0.35% fail on Doors
      • 0.24% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.12% fail on Door condition
        • 0.12% fail on Catch
      • 0.12% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.12% fail on Door condition
    • 0.24% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.24% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.24% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.12% fail on Tank
      • 0.12% fail on Pipe
    • 0.24% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.12% fail on Towbar
      • 0.12% fail on Other towbar components
  • 9.1% fail on Visibility
    • 4.8% fail on Washers
    • 4.1% fail on Wipers
    • 0.24% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.24% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.24% fail on View to rear
      • 0.24% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.12% fail on Driver's view
  • 5.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (64% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 4.7% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.24% fail on Seat belts (87% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Condition
    • 0.12% fail on Airbags
      • 0.12% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 4.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (38% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Exhaust emissions (45% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 3.1% fail on Compression ignition (39% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 2.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.35% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.35% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.12% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
      • 0.59% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.59% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.95% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.47% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.35% fail on Transmission oil leaks (4 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 4.1% fail on Tyres (34% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.1% fail on Condition (59% better than other 2008 vans)
  • 2.4% fail on Steering (57% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Steering linkage components (67% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Track rod end (67% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.35% fail on Power steering
      • 0.35% fail on Operation
    • 0.24% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.24% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.24% fail on Steering coupling (7 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Universal joint (7 times worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.24% fail on Steering play
      • 0.24% fail on Steering rack
  • 1.1% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.95% fail on Registration plates
    • 0.12% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.24% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.24% fail on Attachment