MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Isuzu » Rodeo » 2009

Isuzu Rodeo MOT Results

Registered in 2009
50.5% pass rate
from 669 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 vans and highlighted areas where the Isuzu Rodeo is unusually good or bad.

  • 27% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (40% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 8.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 7.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (190% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 7.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (190% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 7.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (190% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 5.5% fail on Headlamps (55% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 5.5% fail on Headlamp (64% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 5.4% fail on Direction indicators (100% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 5.4% fail on Flashing type (100% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 4.6% fail on Side repeaters (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.90% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 5.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.75% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.60% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.45% fail on Horn
      • 0.15% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.45% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.45% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.30% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.30% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.15% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.15% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.15% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 19% fail on Suspension
    • 7.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.9% fail on Ball joint (65% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 6.3% fail on Springs
      • 5.8% fail on Leaf springs (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 3.3% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (18 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 2.2% fail on Leaf spring
        • 0.45% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Anchor bracket
      • 0.30% fail on Coil springs (90% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.30% fail on Coil spring (89% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 4.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.1% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.9% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.15% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.15% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 3.9% fail on Wheel bearings (140% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.2% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.90% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.45% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.90% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 13% fail on Brakes
    • 5.7% fail on Brake performance (34% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.5% fail on Rbt
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.30% fail on Decelerometer (24 times worse than other 2009 vans)
          • 0.30% fail on Service brake performance (27 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (63% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (71% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.45% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (6 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.90% fail on Rbt
          • 0.75% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.15% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.15% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.15% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.45% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.30% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.15% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.15% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.15% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
    • 4.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.4% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 2.4% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 1.6% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (150% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Pedal
      • 0.60% fail on Hand lever (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Parking brake control (170% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Lever (170% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Mechanical brake components (72% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.60% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.60% fail on Cable
      • 0.30% fail on Brake linings and pads (89% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.30% fail on Brake pads (89% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Brake discs and drums (81% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.30% fail on Brake discs (81% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.60% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.30% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.30% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.15% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.15% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 9.9% fail on Visibility
    • 5.2% fail on Wipers
    • 4.6% fail on Washers
    • 0.45% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.45% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.45% fail on View to rear
      • 0.45% fail on Mirrors
  • 7.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.0% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.4% fail on Transmission
      • 1.6% fail on Prop shafts (170% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Joints (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.75% fail on Drive shafts (79% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.75% fail on Joints (79% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Chassis
      • 1.0% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.90% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.60% fail on Tank (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Pipe
    • 0.45% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.45% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.45% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.45% fail on Body
      • 0.30% fail on Other body component
      • 0.15% fail on Panel
    • 0.15% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.15% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.15% fail on Towbar
      • 0.15% fail on Other towbar components
  • 3.9% fail on Tyres (38% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.8% fail on Condition
  • 3.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.5% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (150% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.90% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.75% fail on Condition
      • 0.15% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 3.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (57% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Exhaust emissions (59% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Compression ignition (52% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.75% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (65% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.75% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.15% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 0.15% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.15% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.30% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.30% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 2.2% fail on Steering (57% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Steering linkage components (49% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.15% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.15% fail on Universal joint
  • 1.3% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.15% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.15% fail on Speedometer
  • 0.15% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.15% fail on Attachment