Isuzu Rodeo MOT Results

Registered in 2010
59.8% pass rate
from 1,284 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Isuzu Rodeo is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.0% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 6.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 6.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.16% fail on Switch
    • 4.8% fail on Headlamps (43% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.8% fail on Headlamp (49% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.0% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.31% fail on All position lamps
    • 4.4% fail on Stop lamp (29% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.3% fail on Direction indicators (59% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.3% fail on Flashing type (59% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 3.5% fail on Side repeaters (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.55% fail on Individual direction indicators (70% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.31% fail on All direction indicators
    • 4.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim (42% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim (49% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.0% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.93% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.078% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 0.39% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.39% fail on Switch
    • 0.39% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.16% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.16% fail on Horn (79% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.078% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.16% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.078% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.078% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 14% fail on Suspension
    • 7.5% fail on Springs (100% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 7.3% fail on Leaf springs (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 4.8% fail on Leaf spring (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 2.3% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (16 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.31% fail on Anchor pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.31% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
        • 0.16% fail on Shackle bracket (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.078% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.078% fail on Coil spring
      • 0.078% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.1% fail on Wheel bearings (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.9% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Anti-roll bars (65% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.23% fail on Linkage ball joints (89% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.078% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.078% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.55% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.31% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.078% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.078% fail on Axles
      • 0.078% fail on Axle
  • 13% fail on Brakes
    • 5.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes (68% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.1% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (34% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 2.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (53% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.78% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (16 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.078% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
      • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.8% fail on Rbt
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.62% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.16% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.16% fail on Service brake performance (20 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt
          • 1.0% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.078% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.078% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.078% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.078% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.078% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.62% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.55% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.31% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.31% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.078% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.16% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.5% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (180% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Anti-lock braking system (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Pedal (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.47% fail on Hand lever (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Mechanical brake components (66% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Brake linings and pads (69% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Brake pads (69% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.47% fail on Brake discs and drums (69% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.47% fail on Brake discs (69% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.31% fail on Cable
    • 0.62% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.62% fail on Lever
    • 0.39% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.23% fail on Reservoirs (8 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Master cylinder (22 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.16% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.16% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.078% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.078% fail on Servos
  • 5.5% fail on Visibility (31% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Wipers
    • 2.5% fail on Washers
    • 0.31% fail on View to rear
      • 0.31% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.078% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.078% fail on Windscreen
  • 4.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure (28% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Exhaust system (82% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Transmission (47% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Prop shafts (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Joints (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.31% fail on Prop shaft
      • 0.39% fail on Drive shafts (88% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.39% fail on Joints (88% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.31% fail on Body
      • 0.31% fail on Other body component
    • 0.16% fail on Chassis
      • 0.16% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.16% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.078% fail on Pipe
      • 0.078% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.16% fail on Doors
      • 0.078% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.078% fail on Door condition
      • 0.078% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.078% fail on Door condition
    • 0.078% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.078% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.078% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 3.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (43% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Exhaust emissions (40% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.0% fail on Compression ignition (33% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 1.1% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (50% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.16% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.078% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 0.31% fail on Spark ignition (70% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.31% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.31% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.16% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.078% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.078% fail on Other leaks
  • 2.8% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (55% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.31% fail on Seat belts (71% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Condition
    • 0.078% fail on Airbags
      • 0.078% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 2.8% fail on Tyres (53% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Tread depth (42% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.62% fail on Condition (74% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Size/type
  • 0.78% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.78% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.47% fail on Steering (90% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.078% fail on Operation
      • 0.078% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.16% fail on Steering linkage components (96% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Track rod end (96% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.078% fail on Power steering
      • 0.078% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.078% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.078% fail on Universal joint
  • 0.31% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.31% fail on Attachment