MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Isuzu » Rodeo » 2010

Isuzu Rodeo MOT Results

Registered in 2010
58.0% pass rate
from 1,176 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Isuzu Rodeo is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 7.1% fail on Headlamps (98% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 7.1% fail on Headlamp (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 6.0% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 6.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 6.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.4% fail on Direction indicators (53% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.4% fail on Flashing type (53% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 3.7% fail on Side repeaters (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.51% fail on Individual direction indicators (74% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.26% fail on All direction indicators
    • 4.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim (44% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.68% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.85% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.85% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.85% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.43% fail on Horn
      • 0.17% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.17% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.085% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.51% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.51% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.34% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.34% fail on Switch
    • 0.34% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.085% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.085% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 16% fail on Suspension
    • 6.0% fail on Springs
      • 5.9% fail on Leaf springs (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 3.4% fail on Leaf spring (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 2.3% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (15 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.51% fail on Anchor pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.17% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
      • 0.085% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.085% fail on Coil spring
      • 0.085% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 5.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.1% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint dust cover (83% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Wheel bearings (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (45% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.94% fail on Linkage ball joints (60% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.43% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.17% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.17% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (86% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.085% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.085% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.43% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.26% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.085% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.085% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.085% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.085% fail on Suspension rod
    • 0.085% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.085% fail on Sub-frame
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 6.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes (80% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.4% fail on Brake performance (30% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (48% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 2.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (55% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.34% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.085% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
      • 2.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.1% fail on Rbt
          • 1.8% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.43% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt
          • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.085% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.085% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.94% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.51% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.43% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.17% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (11 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.51% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.3% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (67% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Anti-lock braking system (92% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Mechanical brake components (55% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Brake linings and pads (60% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Brake pads (60% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.60% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.60% fail on Cable
      • 0.51% fail on Brake discs and drums (69% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.51% fail on Brake discs (69% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Pedal (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.43% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.94% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.94% fail on Lever
    • 0.43% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.17% fail on Master cylinder (14 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.085% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.085% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.085% fail on Valves
    • 0.085% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.085% fail on Servos
    • 0.085% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 7.0% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.0% fail on Exhaust system (100% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Transmission (38% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Prop shafts (190% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.0% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.34% fail on Prop shaft
        • 0.085% fail on Bearing housing
      • 1.0% fail on Drive shafts (71% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.85% fail on Joints (75% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.085% fail on Drive shaft
        • 0.085% fail on Flexible couplings
    • 0.85% fail on Chassis
      • 0.85% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.51% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.34% fail on Tank
      • 0.17% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.085% fail on Pipe
    • 0.34% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.34% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.34% fail on Doors
      • 0.34% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.34% fail on Door condition
    • 0.26% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.26% fail on Body
      • 0.17% fail on Other body component
      • 0.085% fail on Panel
    • 0.085% fail on Load security
      • 0.085% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.085% fail on Tailgate condition
    • 0.085% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.085% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.085% fail on Cabs
      • 0.085% fail on Steps
  • 6.5% fail on Visibility (24% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Wipers
    • 3.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.34% fail on View to rear
      • 0.34% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.17% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.17% fail on Windscreen
  • 3.7% fail on Tyres (39% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.4% fail on Condition (49% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.085% fail on Size/type
  • 3.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (42% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Exhaust emissions (39% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.1% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 1.0% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.51% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.17% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.085% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.085% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve
      • 0.26% fail on Spark ignition (77% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.26% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (74% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.085% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.085% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 3.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.4% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.60% fail on Seat belts (62% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.26% fail on Condition
    • 0.085% fail on Airbags
      • 0.085% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.94% fail on Steering (82% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.77% fail on Steering linkage components (83% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.68% fail on Track rod end (83% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.085% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.085% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.085% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.085% fail on Power steering
      • 0.085% fail on Other components
  • 0.43% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.43% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.26% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.26% fail on Attachment