Isuzu TF MOT Results
Registered in 201271.2% pass rate
from 316 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 vans and highlighted areas where the Isuzu TF is unusually good or bad.
-
16% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(31% better than other 2012 vans)
- 5.4% fail on Registration plate lamp (48% better than other 2012 vans)
-
4.7% fail on
Position lamps
- 2.8% fail on Front lamps
- 2.2% fail on Rear lamps
-
4.4% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.4% fail on Headlamp
-
4.1% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
- 4.1% fail on Fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
- 0.63% fail on Tell tale (13 times worse than other 2012 vans)
- 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
- 1.9% fail on Stop lamp (64% better than other 2012 vans)
-
1.6% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.6% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.6% fail on Side repeaters
-
1.6% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.32% fail on Battery
- 0.32% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.32% fail on Horn
-
15% fail on
Suspension
(67% worse than other 2012 vans)
-
7.9% fail on
Shock absorbers
(7 times worse than other 2012 vans)
- 7.9% fail on Condition (7 times worse than other 2012 vans)
-
3.5% fail on
Leaf springs
(6 times worse than other 2012 vans)
- 2.5% fail on Condition (10 times worse than other 2012 vans)
-
1.6% fail on
Pins and bushes
(19 times worse than other 2012 vans)
- 1.6% fail on Shackle (26 times worse than other 2012 vans)
-
2.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
- 0.32% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.32% fail on Attachment
-
2.5% fail on
Wheel bearings
(200% worse than other 2012 vans)
- 2.5% fail on Front (2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
-
0.95% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.95% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.95% fail on Front suspension joints
-
7.9% fail on
Shock absorbers
(7 times worse than other 2012 vans)
-
8.2% fail on
Brakes
-
3.8% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
-
3.8% fail on
Components
(2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
- 3.8% fail on Pipes (3 times worse than other 2012 vans)
-
3.8% fail on
Components
(2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
-
2.8% fail on
Brake performance
- 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.95% fail on Rear wheels
- 0.63% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.32% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.32% fail on Front wheels
-
1.3% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.3% fail on Condition
- 1.3% fail on ABS
-
0.95% fail on
Hub components
(75% better than other 2012 vans)
- 0.95% fail on Brake pads
-
0.32% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.32% fail on Cable
-
0.32% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
-
0.32% fail on
Components
- 0.32% fail on Pipes
-
0.32% fail on
Components
- 0.32% fail on Restricted movement
-
3.8% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
-
4.4% fail on
Tyres
- 3.2% fail on Tread depth
- 1.9% fail on Condition
-
4.4% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 2.8% fail on Wipers
- 0.95% fail on Washers
- 0.63% fail on Mirrors
- 0.32% fail on Bonnet
-
0.95% fail on
Steering
-
0.95% fail on
Steering system
- 0.32% fail on Steering rack
- 0.32% fail on Ball joint
- 0.32% fail on Track rod end
-
0.95% fail on
Steering system
-
0.63% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
0.63% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.63% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
0.63% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
-
0.63% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 0.63% fail on Body condition
-
0.63% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.63% fail on Registration plate