MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Isuzu » TF » 2012

Isuzu TF MOT Results

Registered in 2012
60.8% pass rate
from 332 tests in 2020
(3.2% better than other 2012 vans)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 vans and highlighted areas where the Isuzu TF is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (4.3% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 6.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 6.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
        • 6.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.30% fail on Switch
    • 6.0% fail on Headlamps (95% worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 6.0% fail on Headlamp (100% worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim (5.8% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim (35% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (52% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Stop lamp (52% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Direction indicators (24% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Flashing type (24% better than other 2012 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Side repeaters (89% worse than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.60% fail on Individual direction indicators (69% better than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.30% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.60% fail on Position lamps (62% worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.60% fail on Position lamp (70% worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.30% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.30% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.30% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 0.30% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.30% fail on Battery(ies)
  • 13% fail on Suspension (9.5% worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 6.0% fail on Springs (81% worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 5.7% fail on Leaf springs (7 times worse than other 2012 vans)
        • 4.8% fail on Leaf spring (10 times worse than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.60% fail on Anchor bracket (49 times worse than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.60% fail on Anchor pins and bushes (16 times worse than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.60% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 5.4% fail on Suspension arms (35% worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 3.9% fail on Ball joint (100% worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint dust cover (4 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 2.4% fail on Wheel bearings (110% worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Anti-roll bars (50% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Pins and bushes (97% worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Linkage
      • 0.30% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 0.90% fail on Other suspension component (150% worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.60% fail on Ball joint (140% worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.30% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 13% fail on Brakes (8.7% worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 6.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes (160% worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 4.5% fail on Brake performance (19% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 3.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (4.5% better than other 2012 vans)
        • 2.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (35% better than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.90% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (17 times worse than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.30% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
      • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance (27% better than other 2012 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt (25% better than other 2012 vans)
          • 0.60% fail on Service brake performance (52% better than other 2012 vans)
          • 0.60% fail on Service brake imbalance (36% worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.90% fail on Parking brake performance (32% better than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.90% fail on Rbt (30% better than other 2012 vans)
          • 0.60% fail on Parking brake performance (47% better than other 2012 vans)
          • 0.30% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.30% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.30% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.30% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 2.1% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (140% worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Anti-lock braking system (150% worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 1.2% fail on Mechanical brake components (73% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.60% fail on Brake linings and pads (82% better than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.60% fail on Brake pads (82% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.60% fail on Brake discs and drums (56% better than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.60% fail on Brake discs (55% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.90% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (66% worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.90% fail on Pedal (110% worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.60% fail on Parking brake control (26% worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.60% fail on Lever (27% worse than other 2012 vans)
  • 9.0% fail on Visibility (30% worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 5.1% fail on Wipers (53% worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Washers (45% worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.30% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.30% fail on Windscreen
  • 5.7% fail on Body, chassis, structure (2.0% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Transmission (21% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Prop shafts (5 times worse than other 2012 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Prop shaft (14 times worse than other 2012 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Joints (4 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.90% fail on Drive shafts (74% better than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.60% fail on Joints (82% better than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.30% fail on Drive shaft
    • 0.90% fail on Exhaust system (15% worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.60% fail on Bumpers (2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.60% fail on Doors (150% worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.30% fail on Door condition
      • 0.30% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.30% fail on Door condition
      • 0.30% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.30% fail on Door condition
    • 0.30% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.30% fail on Tank
    • 0.30% fail on Body
      • 0.30% fail on Other body component
  • 4.8% fail on Tyres (15% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 3.6% fail on Tread depth (2.0% worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Condition (34% better than other 2012 vans)
  • 2.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (33% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Exhaust emissions (29% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Compression ignition (30% better than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.90% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.60% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (38% better than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.60% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (67% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.60% fail on Spark ignition (31% better than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.60% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (27% better than other 2012 vans)
  • 2.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (50% worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (160% worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.30% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.30% fail on Condition
  • 1.2% fail on Identification of the vehicle (100% worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plates (100% worse than other 2012 vans)
  • 0.60% fail on Steering (82% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.60% fail on Steering linkage components (79% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.30% fail on Track rod end