MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Isuzu » TF » 2012
Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Isuzu TF MOT Results

Registered in 2012
71.2% pass rate
from 316 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 vans and highlighted areas where the Isuzu TF is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (31% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 5.4% fail on Registration plate lamp (48% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 4.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.8% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.2% fail on Rear lamps
    • 4.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.4% fail on Headlamp
    • 4.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 4.1% fail on Fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.63% fail on Tell tale (13 times worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.9% fail on Stop lamp (64% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.6% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.6% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.32% fail on Battery
    • 0.32% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.32% fail on Horn
  • 15% fail on Suspension (67% worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 7.9% fail on Shock absorbers (7 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 7.9% fail on Condition (7 times worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Leaf springs (6 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Condition (10 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Pins and bushes (19 times worse than other 2012 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Shackle (26 times worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.32% fail on Attachment
    • 2.5% fail on Wheel bearings (200% worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Front (2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.95% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.95% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.95% fail on Front suspension joints
  • 8.2% fail on Brakes
    • 3.8% fail on Hydraulic systems (2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 3.8% fail on Components (2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
        • 3.8% fail on Pipes (3 times worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.95% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.63% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.32% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.32% fail on Front wheels
    • 1.3% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on ABS
    • 0.95% fail on Hub components (75% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.95% fail on Brake pads
    • 0.32% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.32% fail on Cable
    • 0.32% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.32% fail on Components
        • 0.32% fail on Pipes
    • 0.32% fail on Restricted movement
  • 4.4% fail on Tyres
    • 3.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.9% fail on Condition
  • 4.4% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 2.8% fail on Wipers
    • 0.95% fail on Washers
    • 0.63% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.32% fail on Bonnet
  • 0.95% fail on Steering
    • 0.95% fail on Steering system
      • 0.32% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.32% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.32% fail on Track rod end
  • 0.63% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.63% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.63% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 0.63% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.63% fail on Body condition
  • 0.63% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.63% fail on Registration plate