MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Isuzu » TF » 2012

Isuzu TF MOT Results

Registered in 2012
61.4% pass rate
from 329 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 vans and highlighted areas where the Isuzu TF is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.1% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 6.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
        • 6.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 5.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.6% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.4% fail on Side repeaters (180% worse than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.61% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 1.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.2% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.91% fail on Headlamp aim (74% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.91% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.61% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.61% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.30% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.30% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.30% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.30% fail on Battery(ies)
  • 12% fail on Suspension
    • 5.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.6% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 4.3% fail on Springs
      • 3.6% fail on Leaf springs (3 times worse than other 2012 vans)
        • 2.7% fail on Leaf spring (4 times worse than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.61% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.30% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
      • 0.61% fail on Coil springs (80% better than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.61% fail on Coil spring (80% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Anti-roll bars (63% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.91% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.91% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.30% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.30% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.5% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.5% fail on Other suspension component (2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.61% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.61% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 10% fail on Brakes
    • 4.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 4.0% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.61% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (13 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.91% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.91% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.61% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.30% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.91% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.91% fail on Rbt
          • 0.91% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.30% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.30% fail on Rbt
          • 0.30% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.30% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.1% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.61% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.61% fail on Cable
      • 0.30% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.30% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.8% fail on Parking brake control (2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Lever (2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.91% fail on Hand lever (7 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.61% fail on Pedal
    • 1.5% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.5% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 9.1% fail on Visibility
    • 4.9% fail on Wipers
    • 4.6% fail on Washers
    • 0.61% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.61% fail on Windscreen
  • 6.1% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 2.7% fail on Transmission
      • 2.1% fail on Prop shafts (5 times worse than other 2012 vans)
        • 1.8% fail on Joints (7 times worse than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.30% fail on Prop shaft
      • 0.91% fail on Drive shafts (76% better than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.61% fail on Joints (84% better than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.30% fail on Drive shaft
    • 2.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.91% fail on Chassis (10 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.91% fail on Chassis condition (11 times worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.61% fail on Towbar (21 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.61% fail on Safety device (108 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.30% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.30% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
  • 6.1% fail on Tyres
    • 5.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.91% fail on Condition
    • 0.30% fail on Size/type
  • 2.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.4% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.8% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.5% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.61% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.30% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.61% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.61% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.30% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.30% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 2.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.2% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.91% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.61% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.30% fail on Condition
  • 0.61% fail on Steering (84% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.30% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.30% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.30% fail on Power steering
      • 0.30% fail on Operation
  • 0.30% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.30% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.30% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.30% fail on Attachment