IVECO Daily MOT Results
Registered in 200044.0% pass rate
from 514 tests in 2017
(12% worse than other 2000 vans)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the IVECO Daily is unusually good or bad.
-
37% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(30% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 18% fail on Registration plate lamp (110% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
9.1% fail on
Position lamps
- 4.9% fail on Rear lamps
- 4.5% fail on Front lamps
- 0.78% fail on All position lamps (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 8.4% fail on Headlamp aim
- 6.6% fail on Battery (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 6.2% fail on Stop lamp
-
5.8% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 5.8% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.39% fail on Tell tale
- 0.19% fail on Switch
-
5.1% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.9% fail on Headlamp
-
0.19% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.19% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
- 0.19% fail on Switch
- 0.19% fail on Dipswitch
-
4.9% fail on
Direction indicators
-
4.9% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.3% fail on Individual lamps
- 1.4% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.39% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.19% fail on Switch
-
4.9% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.3% fail on Horn
-
1.2% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.97% fail on Switch (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.19% fail on Lamp
- 0.78% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.39% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
0.39% fail on
Outline marker lamps
(67 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.39% fail on All outline markers (67 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.19% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.19% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
36% fail on
Brakes
(69% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
26% fail on
Brake performance
(100% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 20% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 11% fail on Service brake performance (190% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 9.7% fail on Rear wheels (77% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 5.8% fail on Front wheels
- 1.6% fail on Brake imbalance
- 1.2% fail on Brake performance not tested (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.19% fail on Brake operation
-
20% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(94% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
17% fail on
Components
(78% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 8.6% fail on Pipes (59% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 8.4% fail on Valves (190% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 4.3% fail on Hoses (110% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.58% fail on Reservoirs
- 3.9% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (11 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 1.8% fail on Leaks (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.19% fail on Operation
-
17% fail on
Components
(78% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
3.7% fail on
Hub components
- 1.6% fail on Brake pads
- 1.6% fail on Brake discs
- 0.58% fail on Brake calipers (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.19% fail on Brake drums
-
2.7% fail on
Parking brake
(120% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 2.7% fail on Condition (120% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
2.1% fail on
Mechanical components
(2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Cable
- 0.39% fail on Linkage (14 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.19% fail on Rod
- 0.19% fail on Lever
- 0.19% fail on Relay lever
-
1.9% fail on
Prescribed areas
(4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 1.9% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (17 times worse than other 2000 vans)
-
0.97% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.97% fail on
Pedal
- 0.78% fail on Anti-slip
- 0.19% fail on Condition
-
0.97% fail on
Pedal
-
0.39% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
-
0.39% fail on
Components
(5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.19% fail on Servos
- 0.19% fail on Valves
- 0.19% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
-
0.39% fail on
Components
(5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.39% fail on Restricted movement
-
26% fail on
Brake performance
(100% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
22% fail on
Suspension
-
6.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(79% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 2.7% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 2.1% fail on Linkage condition (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.78% fail on Attachment
-
6.4% fail on
Prescribed areas
(41% better than other 2000 vans)
- 4.3% fail on Component mounting
- 1.9% fail on Spring mounting (54% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.78% fail on Subframe mounting
-
4.7% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 1.2% fail on Condition (8 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.39% fail on Attachment
- 4.1% fail on Front suspension joints
-
3.9% fail on
Shock absorbers
(96% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 3.9% fail on Condition (96% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
2.3% fail on
Leaf springs
- 0.58% fail on Condition
-
0.58% fail on
Pins and bushes
- 0.39% fail on Shackle
- 0.19% fail on Anchor
- 0.39% fail on Spring eye (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.19% fail on Anchor bracket
- 0.19% fail on Shackle bracket
- 0.19% fail on Spring saddle
- 0.19% fail on Securing bolts
-
0.97% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.78% fail on Condition
- 0.39% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (8 times worse than other 2000 vans)
-
0.58% fail on
Wheel bearings
(73% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.39% fail on Rear
- 0.19% fail on Front
-
0.19% fail on
Axles
- 0.19% fail on Axle beam
- 0.19% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
-
6.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(79% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
17% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(100% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 11% fail on Body condition (140% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
4.9% fail on
Vehicle structure
(88% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 4.9% fail on Chassis (88% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Body security (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
-
1.2% fail on
Doors
- 0.58% fail on Drivers
- 0.39% fail on Passengers front
- 0.19% fail on Passengers other
- 0.19% fail on Speedometer
-
0.19% fail on
Seats
- 0.19% fail on Drivers
-
0.19% fail on
Load security
- 0.19% fail on Hinged tailboard
-
15% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 9.3% fail on Wipers (48% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 4.5% fail on Washers
- 1.4% fail on Bonnet (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.78% fail on Windscreen
- 0.39% fail on Mirrors
- 0.19% fail on Indirect vision devices
-
8.2% fail on
Tyres
- 5.3% fail on Condition
- 3.3% fail on Tread depth
- 0.39% fail on Size/type
- 0.19% fail on Valve stem
-
7.6% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 5.3% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.9% fail on
Fuel system
- 1.2% fail on Tank (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.58% fail on Cap
- 0.39% fail on System
- 0.58% fail on Emissions
- 0.19% fail on Emissions not tested
-
5.3% fail on
Steering
-
3.7% fail on
Steering system
(43% better than other 2000 vans)
- 1.6% fail on Track rod end (60% better than other 2000 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Steering rack
- 0.78% fail on Ball joint
- 0.19% fail on Steering arm
-
0.19% fail on
Other components
- 0.19% fail on Steering pivot point
-
0.97% fail on
Power steering
- 0.39% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.19% fail on Operation
- 0.19% fail on Pump
- 0.19% fail on Other components
-
0.58% fail on
Steering control
-
0.39% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.39% fail on Universal joint (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.19% fail on Steering column
-
0.39% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.19% fail on Steering operation
-
3.7% fail on
Steering system
(43% better than other 2000 vans)
-
5.1% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
4.9% fail on
Seat belts
- 3.1% fail on Prescribed areas
- 1.8% fail on Condition
-
0.19% fail on
Installation check
- 0.19% fail on Anchorage's
-
0.19% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.19% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
4.9% fail on
Seat belts
-
1.4% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.4% fail on Registration plate
-
0.58% fail on
Towbars
- 0.39% fail on Towbar
- 0.19% fail on Vehicle structure
-
0.58% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.58% fail on Attachment