MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » IVECO » Daily » 2000
Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

IVECO Daily MOT Results

Registered in 2000
44.0% pass rate
from 514 tests in 2017
(12% worse than other 2000 vans)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the IVECO Daily is unusually good or bad.

  • 37% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (30% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 18% fail on Registration plate lamp (110% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 9.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.9% fail on Rear lamps
      • 4.5% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.78% fail on All position lamps (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 8.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 6.6% fail on Battery (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 6.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 5.8% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.39% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.19% fail on Switch
    • 5.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.9% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.19% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.19% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
      • 0.19% fail on Switch
      • 0.19% fail on Dipswitch
    • 4.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.3% fail on Individual lamps
        • 1.4% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.39% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.19% fail on Switch
    • 2.3% fail on Horn
    • 1.2% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.97% fail on Switch (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Lamp
    • 0.78% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.39% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.39% fail on Outline marker lamps (67 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on All outline markers (67 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.19% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.19% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 36% fail on Brakes (69% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 26% fail on Brake performance (100% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 20% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 11% fail on Service brake performance (190% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 9.7% fail on Rear wheels (77% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 5.8% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.6% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 1.2% fail on Brake performance not tested (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Brake operation
    • 20% fail on Hydraulic systems (94% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 17% fail on Components (78% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 8.6% fail on Pipes (59% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 8.4% fail on Valves (190% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 4.3% fail on Hoses (110% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.58% fail on Reservoirs
      • 3.9% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (11 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Leaks (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Operation
    • 3.7% fail on Hub components
      • 1.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.6% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.58% fail on Brake calipers (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Brake drums
    • 2.7% fail on Parking brake (120% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Condition (120% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Mechanical components (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Cable
      • 0.39% fail on Linkage (14 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Rod
      • 0.19% fail on Lever
      • 0.19% fail on Relay lever
    • 1.9% fail on Prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (17 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.97% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.97% fail on Pedal
        • 0.78% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.19% fail on Condition
    • 0.39% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.39% fail on Components (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.19% fail on Servos
        • 0.19% fail on Valves
      • 0.19% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
    • 0.39% fail on Restricted movement
  • 22% fail on Suspension
    • 6.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (79% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 2.1% fail on Linkage condition (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.78% fail on Attachment
    • 6.4% fail on Prescribed areas (41% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 4.3% fail on Component mounting
      • 1.9% fail on Spring mounting (54% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.78% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 4.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.2% fail on Condition (8 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Attachment
    • 4.1% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 3.9% fail on Shock absorbers (96% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 3.9% fail on Condition (96% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Leaf springs
      • 0.58% fail on Condition
      • 0.58% fail on Pins and bushes
        • 0.39% fail on Shackle
        • 0.19% fail on Anchor
      • 0.39% fail on Spring eye (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Anchor bracket
      • 0.19% fail on Shackle bracket
      • 0.19% fail on Spring saddle
      • 0.19% fail on Securing bolts
    • 0.97% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.78% fail on Condition
      • 0.39% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (8 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.58% fail on Wheel bearings (73% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Rear
      • 0.19% fail on Front
    • 0.19% fail on Axles
      • 0.19% fail on Axle beam
    • 0.19% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 17% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (100% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 11% fail on Body condition (140% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 4.9% fail on Vehicle structure (88% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 4.9% fail on Chassis (88% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Body security (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Doors
      • 0.58% fail on Drivers
      • 0.39% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.19% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.19% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.19% fail on Seats
      • 0.19% fail on Drivers
    • 0.19% fail on Load security
      • 0.19% fail on Hinged tailboard
  • 15% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 9.3% fail on Wipers (48% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 4.5% fail on Washers
    • 1.4% fail on Bonnet (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.78% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.39% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.19% fail on Indirect vision devices
  • 8.2% fail on Tyres
    • 5.3% fail on Condition
    • 3.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.39% fail on Size/type
    • 0.19% fail on Valve stem
  • 7.6% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 5.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.9% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.2% fail on Tank (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.58% fail on Cap
      • 0.39% fail on System
    • 0.58% fail on Emissions
    • 0.19% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 5.3% fail on Steering
    • 3.7% fail on Steering system (43% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Track rod end (60% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.78% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.19% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.19% fail on Other components
        • 0.19% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 0.97% fail on Power steering
      • 0.39% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.19% fail on Operation
      • 0.19% fail on Pump
      • 0.19% fail on Other components
    • 0.58% fail on Steering control
      • 0.39% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.39% fail on Universal joint (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Steering column
    • 0.19% fail on Steering operation
  • 5.1% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 4.9% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.1% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.8% fail on Condition
      • 0.19% fail on Installation check
        • 0.19% fail on Anchorage's
    • 0.19% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.19% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 1.4% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.58% fail on Towbars
    • 0.39% fail on Towbar
    • 0.19% fail on Vehicle structure
  • 0.58% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.58% fail on Attachment