LDV Convoy MOT Results

Registered in 2002
48.2% pass rate
from 964 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the LDV Convoy is unusually good or bad.

  • 30% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (24% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 9.2% fail on Headlamp aim (83% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 8.6% fail on Headlamp aim (81% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.73% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 7.8% fail on Headlamps (79% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 7.7% fail on Headlamp (93% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Dipswitch
    • 7.8% fail on Electrical equipment (140% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 5.1% fail on Battery(ies) (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Horn
      • 0.52% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.31% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 5.5% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (50% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 5.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (50% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 5.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (49% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.10% fail on Switch
    • 5.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 5.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.4% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.1% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.62% fail on All direction indicators
    • 4.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.9% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.8% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.10% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.31% fail on Outline marker lamps
      • 0.21% fail on Outline marker lamp
      • 0.10% fail on All outline marker lamps
    • 0.21% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.21% fail on Switch
    • 0.21% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.10% fail on Main beam tell-tale
      • 0.10% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 0.10% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 26% fail on Brakes (28% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 21% fail on Brake performance (65% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 12% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (120% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 12% fail on Rbt (sp) (120% worse than other 2002 vans)
          • 8.0% fail on Service brake imbalance (170% worse than other 2002 vans)
          • 6.7% fail on Service brake performance (110% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.10% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.10% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.10% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 10% fail on Service brake performance (100% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 10% fail on Rbt (100% worse than other 2002 vans)
          • 6.7% fail on Service brake performance (73% worse than other 2002 vans)
          • 4.8% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.10% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.10% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.10% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.10% fail on Service brake performance
      • 9.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (51% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 9.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (54% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.4% fail on Parking brake performance (67% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 3.4% fail on Rbt (71% worse than other 2002 vans)
          • 3.2% fail on Parking brake performance (83% worse than other 2002 vans)
          • 0.31% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.73% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.1% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 2.1% fail on Brake discs
      • 1.7% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.41% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.21% fail on Cable
        • 0.10% fail on Lever
        • 0.10% fail on Pivot
    • 0.93% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.52% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.21% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.10% fail on Master cylinder
      • 0.10% fail on Valves
    • 0.93% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.93% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.83% fail on Load sensing valves (69% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.83% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.83% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.62% fail on Other braking system component (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.21% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
        • 0.10% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
    • 0.52% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.52% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.41% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.41% fail on Pedal
    • 0.41% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.31% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.31% fail on Lever
  • 18% fail on Suspension
    • 8.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.9% fail on Axles (19 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.4% fail on King pins (47 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Stub axle (14 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Axle
      • 0.10% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 3.2% fail on Shock absorbers (120% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.9% fail on Anti-roll bars (58% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.41% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.41% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.10% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.8% fail on Springs (49% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Leaf springs
        • 1.1% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.31% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
        • 0.10% fail on Shackle bracket
      • 0.31% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.41% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.31% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.31% fail on Suspension arms (95% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Pins and bushes (89% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 17% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure (71% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 4.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (73% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 3.6% fail on Chassis
      • 3.6% fail on Chassis condition
    • 2.9% fail on Fuel system (170% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Tank (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.93% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.31% fail on Hose (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on System
      • 0.21% fail on Pipe
    • 2.4% fail on Seats (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Driver's seat (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Passenger's seat (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Exhaust system (49% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Body
      • 0.83% fail on Panel
      • 0.83% fail on Other body component
      • 0.10% fail on Body condition
      • 0.10% fail on Mounting fixings
      • 0.10% fail on Pillar
    • 1.8% fail on Doors
      • 0.73% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.73% fail on Door condition (180% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.62% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.62% fail on Door condition
      • 0.41% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.41% fail on Door condition
    • 0.93% fail on Transmission (81% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.93% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.62% fail on Prop shaft
        • 0.21% fail on Joints
        • 0.10% fail on Bearing housing
    • 0.93% fail on Floor (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.83% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.73% fail on Towbar
      • 0.73% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.62% fail on Cabs
      • 0.41% fail on Steps (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.21% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.10% fail on Spare wheel condition
      • 0.10% fail on Carrier
    • 0.21% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.21% fail on Engine mounting condition
  • 14% fail on Visibility (32% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 6.2% fail on Wipers
    • 6.2% fail on Washers (40% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on View to rear (98% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Mirrors (100% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Bonnet (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.52% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.41% fail on Windscreen
      • 0.10% fail on Window
    • 0.10% fail on Driver's view
  • 9.5% fail on Steering (37% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 5.5% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 4.0% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.3% fail on Drag link end (7 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.21% fail on Other components
        • 0.21% fail on Steering linkage (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Prescribed areas (19 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Power steering (160% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Other components (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Operation
      • 0.31% fail on Pump (9 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.83% fail on Steering play (190% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.83% fail on Steering box (16 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.73% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.62% fail on Steering box (15 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Operation
    • 0.10% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.10% fail on Steering column
    • 0.10% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.10% fail on Universal joint
  • 9.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (100% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 9.4% fail on Seat belts (170% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 5.2% fail on Prescribed areas (100% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 4.6% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Requirements
  • 7.6% fail on Tyres
    • 5.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.21% fail on Size/type
  • 6.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.8% fail on Compression ignition
        • 2.6% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.93% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.41% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.10% fail on Pre 01/01/1980 visual
      • 0.73% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.41% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.31% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 2.0% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.6% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.41% fail on Other leaks
  • 1.2% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.93% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests (15 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.52% fail on Doors (13 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Passenger entrance/exit doors (23 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Emergency exits
    • 0.52% fail on Steps and stairs (25 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Steps (21 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Retractable steps
  • 0.83% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.73% fail on Attachment
    • 0.10% fail on Condition
  • 0.10% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.10% fail on Belt(s)/padding