Mazda Bongo MOT Results
Registered in 199645.5% pass rate
from 1,990 tests in 2017
(13% worse than other 1996 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 vans and highlighted areas where the Mazda Bongo is unusually good or bad.
-
31% fail on
Suspension
(38% worse than other 1996 vans)
-
17% fail on
Prescribed areas
(43% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 14% fail on Component mounting (69% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 3.2% fail on Subframe mounting (57% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 1.7% fail on Spring mounting (49% better than other 1996 vans)
-
14% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
- 9.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
- 3.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
- 1.9% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
- 0.90% fail on Linkage condition (86% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 0.25% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 1996 vans)
-
4.8% fail on
Suspension arms
(62% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 4.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (68% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 0.050% fail on Condition
-
2.9% fail on
Drive shafts
-
2.8% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 2.8% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
0.10% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.10% fail on Drive shafts
-
2.8% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 2.6% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.50% fail on
Shock absorbers
(74% better than other 1996 vans)
- 0.50% fail on Condition (74% better than other 1996 vans)
-
0.25% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.25% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.15% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.15% fail on Condition
-
0.10% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.10% fail on Condition
-
0.050% fail on
Torsion bars
- 0.050% fail on Attachment
-
0.050% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.050% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.050% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.050% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.050% fail on
Torque/reaction arms
- 0.050% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.050% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.050% fail on Front
-
17% fail on
Prescribed areas
(43% worse than other 1996 vans)
-
30% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(11% worse than other 1996 vans)
-
12% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(99% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 12% fail on Fog lamp (100% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Tell tale (100% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 0.30% fail on Switch
- 6.3% fail on Stop lamp (42% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 6.3% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
5.7% fail on
Position lamps
- 3.7% fail on Front lamps
- 2.0% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.10% fail on All position lamps
-
5.5% fail on
Headlamps
- 5.4% fail on Headlamp (29% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 0.10% fail on Matched pair
-
0.050% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
- 0.050% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
- 0.050% fail on Switch
- 5.5% fail on Headlamp aim
- 1.9% fail on Battery (37% better than other 1996 vans)
- 1.7% fail on Horn (48% better than other 1996 vans)
-
1.1% fail on
Direction indicators
(66% better than other 1996 vans)
-
1.1% fail on
Flashing type
(66% better than other 1996 vans)
- 0.50% fail on Individual lamps (72% better than other 1996 vans)
- 0.45% fail on Side repeaters (55% better than other 1996 vans)
- 0.10% fail on All direction indicators
-
1.1% fail on
Flashing type
(66% better than other 1996 vans)
- 0.40% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.30% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.10% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
0.10% fail on
Hazard warning
(87% better than other 1996 vans)
- 0.10% fail on Lamp
- 0.050% fail on Rear reflectors
-
12% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(99% worse than other 1996 vans)
-
13% fail on
Brakes
(32% better than other 1996 vans)
-
6.4% fail on
Brake performance
(45% better than other 1996 vans)
- 2.8% fail on Front wheels (41% better than other 1996 vans)
- 2.1% fail on Rear wheels (63% better than other 1996 vans)
- 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance (65% better than other 1996 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Service brake performance (58% better than other 1996 vans)
- 0.30% fail on Brake imbalance (74% better than other 1996 vans)
- 0.15% fail on Brake operation
- 0.050% fail on Parking brake operation
- 0.050% fail on Gradient hand brake
- 0.050% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
3.9% fail on
Hub components
(75% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 3.3% fail on Brake pads (140% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 0.90% fail on Brake discs
- 0.10% fail on Brake calipers
-
2.5% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(67% better than other 1996 vans)
-
2.5% fail on
Components
(65% better than other 1996 vans)
- 2.3% fail on Pipes (44% better than other 1996 vans)
- 0.20% fail on Hoses (90% better than other 1996 vans)
- 0.050% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.10% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.050% fail on Leaks
-
2.5% fail on
Components
(65% better than other 1996 vans)
- 1.1% fail on ABS (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
-
0.55% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.55% fail on Condition
- 0.35% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.10% fail on
Service brake control components
(86% better than other 1996 vans)
-
0.10% fail on
Pedal
(86% better than other 1996 vans)
- 0.050% fail on Condition
- 0.050% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.10% fail on
Pedal
(86% better than other 1996 vans)
-
6.4% fail on
Brake performance
(45% better than other 1996 vans)
-
10% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 7.2% fail on Wipers
- 3.2% fail on Washers
- 0.90% fail on Windscreen
- 0.25% fail on Mirrors (65% better than other 1996 vans)
-
9.5% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 6.1% fail on Exhaust system
-
2.2% fail on
Fuel system
- 1.6% fail on System (76% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 0.50% fail on Cap
- 0.10% fail on Pipe
- 0.050% fail on Tank
- 1.8% fail on Emissions
- 0.65% fail on Emissions not tested
-
8.4% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 5.5% fail on Body condition (29% worse than other 1996 vans)
-
2.6% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 2.6% fail on Chassis
-
0.35% fail on
Doors
- 0.20% fail on Passengers other
- 0.10% fail on Drivers
- 0.050% fail on Passengers front
-
0.20% fail on
Seats
(70% better than other 1996 vans)
- 0.20% fail on Passengers
- 0.050% fail on Body security
-
6.5% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
6.3% fail on
Seat belts
- 5.5% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.50% fail on Condition
- 0.30% fail on Requirements
- 0.15% fail on Attachment
-
0.20% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.20% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
6.3% fail on
Seat belts
-
5.9% fail on
Tyres
- 3.2% fail on Tread depth
- 2.5% fail on Condition
- 0.30% fail on Valve stem
- 0.15% fail on Size/type
-
5.8% fail on
Steering
-
4.3% fail on
Steering system
- 2.5% fail on Track rod end
- 1.8% fail on Steering rack
- 0.25% fail on Ball joint
-
0.050% fail on
Free play
- 0.050% fail on Steering rack
- 0.050% fail on Steering box
-
1.2% fail on
Power steering
- 0.95% fail on Other components (180% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 0.20% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.050% fail on Operation
-
0.25% fail on
Steering control
-
0.20% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.20% fail on Universal joint
- 0.050% fail on Steering column
-
0.20% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.15% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.10% fail on Locking devices
-
4.3% fail on
Steering system
-
1.2% fail on
Towbars
(110% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Vehicle structure (130% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 0.050% fail on Towbar
-
0.40% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.40% fail on Attachment
-
0.35% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
(72% better than other 1996 vans)
- 0.35% fail on Registration plate (71% better than other 1996 vans)