Mazda Bongo MOT Results
Registered in 199959.5% pass rate
from 257 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 vans and highlighted areas where the Mazda Bongo is unusually good or bad.
-
16% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
7.4% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(91% worse than other 1999 vans)
-
7.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(91% worse than other 1999 vans)
- 7.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (91% worse than other 1999 vans)
-
7.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(91% worse than other 1999 vans)
-
5.8% fail on
Headlamps
- 5.8% fail on Headlamp
- 2.7% fail on Stop lamp
-
1.2% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.2% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
1.2% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.78% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.78% fail on Battery(ies)
-
0.39% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 0.39% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.39% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.39% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.39% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
7.4% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(91% worse than other 1999 vans)
-
16% fail on
Suspension
-
8.6% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(2 times worse than other 1999 vans)
- 1.9% fail on Pins and bushes
- 1.9% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (12 times worse than other 1999 vans)
- 1.6% fail on Ball joint (12 times worse than other 1999 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Anti-roll bar (14 times worse than other 1999 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (11 times worse than other 1999 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 1.2% fail on Linkage ball joints (7 times worse than other 1999 vans)
- 0.78% fail on Ball joint dust cover (16 times worse than other 1999 vans)
- 0.39% fail on Linkage
- 5.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
4.7% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.7% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 1.9% fail on Ball joint
- 0.39% fail on Pins and bushes
-
1.2% fail on
Sub-frames
- 1.2% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
0.39% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.39% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
8.6% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(2 times worse than other 1999 vans)
-
14% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(2 times worse than other 1999 vans)
-
12% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(2 times worse than other 1999 vans)
-
12% fail on
Spark ignition
(8 times worse than other 1999 vans)
- 11% fail on Catalyst emissions (9 times worse than other 1999 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.39% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.39% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.39% fail on Emissions not tested
-
12% fail on
Spark ignition
(8 times worse than other 1999 vans)
-
1.6% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.78% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.39% fail on Transmission oil leaks
- 0.39% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
-
12% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(2 times worse than other 1999 vans)
-
8.2% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(44% better than other 1999 vans)
-
3.1% fail on
Chassis
- 3.1% fail on Chassis condition
- 2.7% fail on Exhaust system
-
2.3% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 2.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.78% fail on
Transmission
(79% better than other 1999 vans)
-
0.78% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.78% fail on Joints
-
0.78% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.39% fail on
Body
- 0.39% fail on Panel
-
3.1% fail on
Chassis
-
6.2% fail on
Visibility
- 5.4% fail on Wipers
- 0.78% fail on Washers (85% better than other 1999 vans)
-
5.8% fail on
Brakes
(65% better than other 1999 vans)
-
3.5% fail on
Brake performance
(69% better than other 1999 vans)
-
1.9% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 1.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
1.6% fail on
Service brake performance
(68% better than other 1999 vans)
-
1.6% fail on
Rbt
- 0.78% fail on Service brake performance (81% better than other 1999 vans)
- 0.78% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
1.6% fail on
Rbt
-
1.2% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.2% fail on
Rbt
- 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance
-
1.2% fail on
Rbt
-
0.39% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.39% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.39% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.39% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
1.9% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
-
1.6% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(9 times worse than other 1999 vans)
- 1.6% fail on Anti-lock braking system (9 times worse than other 1999 vans)
-
1.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.2% fail on Brake pads
-
1.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.39% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.39% fail on Lever
- 0.39% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
3.5% fail on
Brake performance
(69% better than other 1999 vans)
-
3.1% fail on
Tyres
- 2.3% fail on Tread depth
- 0.78% fail on Condition
-
2.3% fail on
Steering
-
1.6% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.6% fail on Track rod end
-
0.39% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.39% fail on Steering rack
-
0.39% fail on
Power steering
- 0.39% fail on Rams
-
1.6% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
1.2% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.78% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.39% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.39% fail on Condition
- 0.39% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.78% fail on
Seat belts