MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Mazda » Bongo » 2000

Mazda Bongo MOT Results

Registered in 2000
63.2% pass rate
from 261 tests in 2021
(24% better than other 2000 vans)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the Mazda Bongo is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 8.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (96% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 8.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (96% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 8.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (96% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.6% fail on Headlamp
    • 4.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.5% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.1% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.38% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 1.1% fail on Headlamp aim (78% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp aim (76% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.77% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.38% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.38% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.38% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.38% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.38% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.38% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.38% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 14% fail on Suspension
    • 7.7% fail on Anti-roll bars (170% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 2.3% fail on Linkage ball joints (7 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Ball joint dust cover (22 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (12 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.38% fail on Ball joint
    • 3.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.38% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 2.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (74% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.38% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.38% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.38% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.38% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.38% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.38% fail on Other suspension component
  • 6.9% fail on Brakes (62% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Brake performance (69% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance (72% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt (71% better than other 2000 vans)
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.5% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (74% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (74% better than other 2000 vans)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.38% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.77% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (83% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.77% fail on Rbt (sp) (83% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.38% fail on Rbt
          • 0.38% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 3.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.4% fail on Brake linings and pads (170% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 3.4% fail on Brake pads (180% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.38% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.1% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
  • 6.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure (55% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.5% fail on Chassis
      • 1.5% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.1% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.77% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.38% fail on Hose
    • 1.1% fail on Transmission
      • 1.1% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.1% fail on Joints
    • 0.77% fail on Exhaust system (81% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.38% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.38% fail on Doors
      • 0.38% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.38% fail on Door condition
  • 6.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 6.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 6.1% fail on Spark ignition (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 5.4% fail on Catalyst emissions (6 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.77% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.38% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.38% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 4.6% fail on Visibility (55% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Wipers
    • 1.5% fail on Washers (68% better than other 2000 vans)
  • 2.3% fail on Tyres
    • 1.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.77% fail on Condition
  • 1.9% fail on Steering (72% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.9% fail on Track rod end
  • 0.77% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.77% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.77% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (82% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.77% fail on Seat belts (80% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.38% fail on Requirements