Mazda Bongo MOT Results

Registered in 2000
57.7% pass rate
from 1,025 tests in 2020
(12% better than other 2000 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the Mazda Bongo is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 11% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (140% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 11% fail on Rear fog lamp (140% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 10% fail on Rear fog lamp (150% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.39% fail on Switch
    • 4.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.9% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.098% fail on Dipswitch
    • 3.2% fail on Stop lamp (36% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Electrical equipment (46% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.88% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.88% fail on Horn (67% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 2.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim (66% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim (70% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.6% fail on Position lamps (53% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Position lamp (51% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.49% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.49% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.20% fail on Direction indicators (94% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Flashing type (94% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.098% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.098% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.20% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 15% fail on Suspension (25% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 6.9% fail on Anti-roll bars (110% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Linkage ball joints (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 1.4% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.4% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.78% fail on Ball joint dust cover (6 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Linkage
      • 0.20% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.098% fail on Anti-roll bar
    • 5.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (36% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.9% fail on Ball joint dust cover (110% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.88% fail on Ball joint (70% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Pins and bushes (81% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.098% fail on Suspension arm
    • 0.49% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.49% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.49% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.29% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.20% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.39% fail on Shock absorbers (69% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.29% fail on Wheel bearings (84% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.098% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.098% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 9.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (70% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 8.6% fail on Exhaust emissions (95% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 8.0% fail on Spark ignition (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 6.8% fail on Catalyst emissions (6 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.78% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.49% fail on Non catalyst emissions (9 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.098% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.59% fail on Compression ignition (82% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.39% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (77% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.098% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.098% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.49% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.29% fail on Transmission oil leaks (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 7.9% fail on Visibility
    • 5.9% fail on Wipers
    • 2.0% fail on Washers (59% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.29% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.20% fail on View to rear
      • 0.20% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.098% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.098% fail on Windscreen
  • 7.8% fail on Brakes (57% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Brake performance (73% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance (63% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.8% fail on Rbt (64% better than other 2000 vans)
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance (60% better than other 2000 vans)
          • 0.20% fail on Service brake imbalance (86% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.098% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.098% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.68% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (85% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.49% fail on Rbt (sp) (89% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.20% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.49% fail on Parking brake performance (67% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.49% fail on Rbt (65% better than other 2000 vans)
          • 0.29% fail on Parking brake performance (76% better than other 2000 vans)
          • 0.20% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.39% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (93% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.39% fail on Rbt (sp) (93% better than other 2000 vans)
          • 0.39% fail on Service brake performance (88% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.098% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.7% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.59% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.59% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.0% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (6 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Anti-lock braking system (7 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.88% fail on Rigid brake pipes (82% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.29% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.20% fail on Pedal
      • 0.098% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.098% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.098% fail on Lever
    • 0.098% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.098% fail on Valves
  • 7.6% fail on Body, chassis, structure (51% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure (57% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (56% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Transmission (73% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Drive shafts (64% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Joints (66% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.098% fail on Flexible couplings
    • 0.98% fail on Chassis (70% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.98% fail on Chassis condition (70% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.68% fail on Towbar
      • 0.59% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.098% fail on Towbar condition
    • 0.68% fail on Body
      • 0.39% fail on Other body component
      • 0.20% fail on Panel
      • 0.098% fail on Pillar
    • 0.39% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.39% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.29% fail on Doors
      • 0.20% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.20% fail on Door condition
      • 0.098% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.098% fail on Door condition
    • 0.098% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.098% fail on Seats
      • 0.098% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.098% fail on Cabs
      • 0.098% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 2.9% fail on Steering (57% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Steering linkage components (47% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Track rod end (42% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.098% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.59% fail on Steering gear (70% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Steering rack (68% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.20% fail on Power steering
      • 0.20% fail on Other components
  • 2.7% fail on Tyres (47% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.20% fail on Size/type
  • 2.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (45% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Seat belts (54% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas (65% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Condition
      • 0.29% fail on Requirements
      • 0.098% fail on Attachment
    • 0.68% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.29% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.20% fail on Attachment
    • 0.098% fail on Condition
  • 0.098% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.098% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.098% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.098% fail on Speedometer