MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Mazda » Bongo » 2000

Mazda Bongo MOT Results

Registered in 2000
56.3% pass rate
from 792 tests in 2017
(12% better than other 2000 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the Mazda Bongo is unusually good or bad.

  • 27% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 13% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 13% fail on Fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.76% fail on Tell tale (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Switch
    • 5.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 5.3% fail on Registration plate lamp (38% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 5.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.3% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.0% fail on Rear lamps
    • 4.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.2% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.13% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.13% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 3.0% fail on Stop lamp (50% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Battery
    • 0.51% fail on Direction indicators (86% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.51% fail on Flashing type (86% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.38% fail on Individual lamps (84% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.38% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.38% fail on Horn (86% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.38% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.13% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 15% fail on Suspension (37% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 7.3% fail on Anti-roll bars (100% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 4.9% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (160% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (95% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Attachment
      • 0.13% fail on Linkage condition
    • 4.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.13% fail on Attachment
    • 3.8% fail on Prescribed areas (65% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 3.0% fail on Component mounting (55% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Subframe mounting
      • 0.13% fail on Spring mounting
    • 1.5% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.63% fail on Drive shafts (82% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.63% fail on Front drive shafts (82% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.63% fail on Constant velocity joints (82% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.51% fail on Shock absorbers (75% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.51% fail on Condition (75% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.38% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.38% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.13% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.13% fail on Condition
    • 0.13% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.13% fail on Condition
    • 0.13% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.13% fail on Front
  • 8.2% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 5.6% fail on Emissions (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Exhaust system (51% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.76% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.51% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.38% fail on Cap
      • 0.13% fail on System
  • 8.2% fail on Driver's view of the road (30% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 5.3% fail on Wipers
    • 2.5% fail on Washers (47% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.13% fail on Mirrors
  • 7.6% fail on Brakes (64% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Hub components (67% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 3.2% fail on Brake pads (130% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.51% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.8% fail on Brake performance (78% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Front wheels (77% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Rear wheels (82% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.63% fail on Parking brake performance (88% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.51% fail on Service brake performance (86% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 0.76% fail on ABS (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.38% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.25% fail on Parking brake (79% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Condition (79% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.25% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.25% fail on Pedal
        • 0.13% fail on Condition
        • 0.13% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.25% fail on Hydraulic systems (98% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.13% fail on Components
        • 0.13% fail on Hoses
  • 4.5% fail on Tyres (39% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Condition
    • 2.0% fail on Tread depth (50% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.51% fail on Size/type
  • 3.4% fail on Steering (55% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Steering system (59% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Track rod end (48% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.51% fail on Steering rack (72% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.51% fail on Power steering
      • 0.25% fail on Other components
      • 0.13% fail on Operation
      • 0.13% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.13% fail on Steering control
      • 0.13% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.13% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.13% fail on Locking devices
  • 2.3% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (61% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Seat belts (56% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Prescribed areas (72% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.88% fail on Requirements (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Condition
      • 0.13% fail on Installation check
        • 0.13% fail on Anchorage's
  • 2.3% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (73% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Body condition (75% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.51% fail on Doors
      • 0.25% fail on Drivers
      • 0.25% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.38% fail on Vehicle structure (85% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Chassis (85% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.25% fail on Body security
    • 0.13% fail on Seats
      • 0.13% fail on Passengers
  • 0.38% fail on Registration plates and VIN (73% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.38% fail on Registration plate (73% better than other 2000 vans)
  • 0.25% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.25% fail on Attachment
  • 0.13% fail on Towbars
    • 0.13% fail on Vehicle structure