Mazda Bongo MOT Results
Registered in 200056.3% pass rate
from 792 tests in 2017
(12% better than other 2000 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the Mazda Bongo is unusually good or bad.
-
27% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
-
13% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 13% fail on Fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.76% fail on Tell tale (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.38% fail on Switch
- 5.4% fail on Headlamp aim
- 5.3% fail on Registration plate lamp (38% better than other 2000 vans)
-
5.1% fail on
Position lamps
- 3.3% fail on Front lamps
- 2.0% fail on Rear lamps
-
4.3% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.2% fail on Headlamp
-
0.13% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.13% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
- 3.0% fail on Stop lamp (50% better than other 2000 vans)
- 2.3% fail on Battery
-
0.51% fail on
Direction indicators
(86% better than other 2000 vans)
-
0.51% fail on
Flashing type
(86% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.38% fail on Individual lamps (84% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.13% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.51% fail on
Flashing type
(86% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.38% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.38% fail on Horn (86% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.38% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.13% fail on Electrical wiring
-
13% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
-
15% fail on
Suspension
(37% better than other 2000 vans)
-
7.3% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(100% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 4.9% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (160% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 2.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (95% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.38% fail on Attachment
- 0.13% fail on Linkage condition
-
4.2% fail on
Suspension arms
- 4.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.13% fail on Attachment
-
3.8% fail on
Prescribed areas
(65% better than other 2000 vans)
- 3.0% fail on Component mounting (55% better than other 2000 vans)
- 1.0% fail on Subframe mounting
- 0.13% fail on Spring mounting
- 1.5% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.63% fail on
Drive shafts
(82% better than other 2000 vans)
-
0.63% fail on
Front drive shafts
(82% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.63% fail on Constant velocity joints (82% better than other 2000 vans)
-
0.63% fail on
Front drive shafts
(82% better than other 2000 vans)
-
0.51% fail on
Shock absorbers
(75% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.51% fail on Condition (75% better than other 2000 vans)
-
0.38% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.38% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
-
0.13% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.13% fail on Condition
-
0.13% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.13% fail on Condition
-
0.13% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.13% fail on Front
-
7.3% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(100% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
8.2% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 5.6% fail on Emissions (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 2.8% fail on Exhaust system (51% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.76% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.51% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.38% fail on Cap
- 0.13% fail on System
-
8.2% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(30% better than other 2000 vans)
- 5.3% fail on Wipers
- 2.5% fail on Washers (47% better than other 2000 vans)
- 1.0% fail on Windscreen
- 0.13% fail on Mirrors
-
7.6% fail on
Brakes
(64% better than other 2000 vans)
-
3.7% fail on
Hub components
(67% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 3.2% fail on Brake pads (130% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.51% fail on Brake discs
-
2.8% fail on
Brake performance
(78% better than other 2000 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Front wheels (77% better than other 2000 vans)
- 1.0% fail on Rear wheels (82% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.63% fail on Parking brake performance (88% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.51% fail on Service brake performance (86% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.13% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.76% fail on ABS (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.38% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.25% fail on
Parking brake
(79% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.25% fail on Condition (79% better than other 2000 vans)
-
0.25% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.25% fail on
Pedal
- 0.13% fail on Condition
- 0.13% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.25% fail on
Pedal
-
0.25% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(98% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.13% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
-
0.13% fail on
Components
- 0.13% fail on Hoses
-
3.7% fail on
Hub components
(67% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
4.5% fail on
Tyres
(39% better than other 2000 vans)
- 2.1% fail on Condition
- 2.0% fail on Tread depth (50% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.51% fail on Size/type
-
3.4% fail on
Steering
(55% better than other 2000 vans)
-
2.7% fail on
Steering system
(59% better than other 2000 vans)
- 2.0% fail on Track rod end (48% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.51% fail on Steering rack (72% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.13% fail on Ball joint
-
0.51% fail on
Power steering
- 0.25% fail on Other components
- 0.13% fail on Operation
- 0.13% fail on Pipes and hoses
-
0.13% fail on
Steering control
-
0.13% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.13% fail on Universal joint
-
0.13% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.13% fail on Locking devices
-
2.7% fail on
Steering system
(59% better than other 2000 vans)
-
2.3% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(61% better than other 2000 vans)
-
2.3% fail on
Seat belts
(56% better than other 2000 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Prescribed areas (72% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.88% fail on Requirements (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.25% fail on Condition
-
0.13% fail on
Installation check
- 0.13% fail on Anchorage's
-
2.3% fail on
Seat belts
(56% better than other 2000 vans)
-
2.3% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(73% better than other 2000 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Body condition (75% better than other 2000 vans)
-
0.51% fail on
Doors
- 0.25% fail on Drivers
- 0.25% fail on Passengers front
-
0.38% fail on
Vehicle structure
(85% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.38% fail on Chassis (85% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.25% fail on Body security
-
0.13% fail on
Seats
- 0.13% fail on Passengers
-
0.38% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
(73% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.38% fail on Registration plate (73% better than other 2000 vans)
-
0.25% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.25% fail on Attachment
-
0.13% fail on
Towbars
- 0.13% fail on Vehicle structure