MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Mazda » Bongo » 2002

Mazda Bongo MOT Results

Registered in 2002
70.5% pass rate
from 332 tests in 2021
(39% better than other 2002 vans)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the Mazda Bongo is unusually good or bad.

  • 12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (43% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 6.0% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 6.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 6.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.8% fail on Stop lamp (66% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim (68% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim (72% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.60% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.60% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.60% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.60% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.30% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.30% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.30% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.30% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.30% fail on Individual direction indicators
  • 9.6% fail on Suspension (51% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 5.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.8% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.5% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.30% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.7% fail on Suspension arms (55% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.30% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.30% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.30% fail on Ball joint
    • 2.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (71% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.60% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.30% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.30% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 6.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 6.0% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 5.7% fail on Spark ignition (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 4.8% fail on Catalyst emissions (13 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.60% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.30% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.30% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.30% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
  • 4.8% fail on Brakes (75% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.1% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.60% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.60% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.1% fail on Brake performance (83% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance (70% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt (69% better than other 2002 vans)
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.30% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.30% fail on Rbt
          • 0.30% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.30% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.30% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 0.30% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.30% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 4.5% fail on Visibility (57% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Wipers
    • 1.2% fail on Washers (74% better than other 2002 vans)
  • 3.0% fail on Body, chassis, structure (80% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.90% fail on Doors
      • 0.90% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.90% fail on Door condition
    • 0.60% fail on Integral vehicle structure (81% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.60% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (81% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.60% fail on Exhaust system (82% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.60% fail on Transmission (88% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.60% fail on Drive shafts (84% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.60% fail on Joints (84% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.30% fail on Chassis
      • 0.30% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.30% fail on Seats
      • 0.30% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 2.4% fail on Steering (64% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Steering linkage components (72% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Track rod end (69% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.60% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.60% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.60% fail on Power steering
      • 0.60% fail on Other components
  • 2.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.8% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.90% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.90% fail on Condition
      • 0.30% fail on Requirements
    • 0.30% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 1.5% fail on Tyres (72% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.90% fail on Condition
    • 0.60% fail on Tread depth (80% better than other 2002 vans)
  • 0.30% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.30% fail on Registration plates