MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Mazda » Bongo » 2002

Mazda Bongo MOT Results

Registered in 2002
61.1% pass rate
from 624 tests in 2017
(24% better than other 2002 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the Mazda Bongo is unusually good or bad.

  • 27% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 12% fail on Rear fog lamp (200% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 12% fail on Fog lamp (190% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Tell tale (7 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Switch (21 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 6.6% fail on Registration plate lamp (38% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 5.1% fail on Position lamps (41% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.7% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.9% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.16% fail on All position lamps
    • 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.6% fail on Stop lamp (65% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Battery
    • 1.8% fail on Headlamps (57% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp (56% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Direction indicators (73% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Flashing type (73% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.80% fail on Individual lamps (70% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.32% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.16% fail on Tell tales
    • 0.32% fail on Horn (87% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 10% fail on Suspension (59% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.4% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.96% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 2.7% fail on Suspension arms (47% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (45% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Prescribed areas (77% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Component mounting (71% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.48% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 1.8% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.96% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.96% fail on Condition
    • 0.32% fail on Drive shafts (93% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Front drive shafts (93% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.32% fail on Constant velocity joints (93% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.16% fail on Condition
    • 0.16% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.16% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 7.5% fail on Driver's view of the road (39% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 5.3% fail on Wipers
    • 1.8% fail on Windscreen
    • 1.8% fail on Washers (61% better than other 2002 vans)
  • 5.1% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 4.2% fail on Emissions (150% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.96% fail on Exhaust system (78% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 4.8% fail on Brakes (78% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Hub components
      • 2.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.48% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.1% fail on Brake performance (91% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.64% fail on Front wheels (85% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Parking brake performance (95% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.16% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.16% fail on Service brake performance
    • 0.96% fail on ABS
    • 0.32% fail on Hydraulic systems (97% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Components (97% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.16% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.16% fail on Pipes
      • 0.16% fail on Leaks
    • 0.16% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.16% fail on Condition
    • 0.16% fail on Restricted movement
  • 4.6% fail on Tyres (43% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Condition
    • 2.2% fail on Tread depth (55% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.32% fail on Size/type
    • 0.16% fail on Valve stem
  • 2.2% fail on Steering (70% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Steering system (65% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Track rod end (57% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint
  • 1.6% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (79% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.80% fail on Doors
      • 0.48% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.32% fail on Drivers
    • 0.64% fail on Body condition (84% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.32% fail on Seats
      • 0.32% fail on Drivers
  • 1.4% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plate
  • 1.3% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (76% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.96% fail on Seat belts (77% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.48% fail on Requirements
      • 0.16% fail on Condition
      • 0.16% fail on Attachment
      • 0.16% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.32% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.32% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 0.16% fail on Towbars
    • 0.16% fail on Vehicle structure