Mazda Bongo MOT Results

Registered in 2003
66.2% pass rate
from 474 tests in 2020
(34% better than other 2003 vans)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 vans and highlighted areas where the Mazda Bongo is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (23% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 10% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 10% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 10% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.84% fail on Switch (9 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Stop lamp (49% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.21% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim (53% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.9% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.21% fail on All position lamps
    • 2.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (56% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.42% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.21% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.21% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 11% fail on Suspension (49% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 6.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 5.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.84% fail on Ball joint (78% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Suspension arm
    • 3.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (54% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Anti-roll bars (49% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.42% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.42% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.42% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.21% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.21% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 5.7% fail on Visibility (48% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on Wipers
    • 1.1% fail on Washers (79% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.63% fail on Driver's view
  • 5.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.3% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 5.3% fail on Spark ignition (5 times worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 2.7% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (5 times worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 1.9% fail on Catalyst emissions (5 times worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.63% fail on Emissions not tested (4 times worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.42% fail on Emission control equipment (43 times worse than other 2003 vans)
          • 0.42% fail on Catalytic converter (62 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.21% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.21% fail on Catalytic converter
    • 0.21% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.21% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 4.0% fail on Body, chassis, structure (74% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Doors
      • 1.3% fail on Driver's door (4 times worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Door condition (4 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.21% fail on Door condition
    • 0.63% fail on Integral vehicle structure (74% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.63% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (74% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.63% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.42% fail on Chassis (84% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.42% fail on Chassis condition (84% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.21% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.21% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.21% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.21% fail on Transmission
      • 0.21% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.21% fail on Joints
    • 0.21% fail on Seats
      • 0.21% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 3.4% fail on Brakes (83% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Brake performance (83% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance (78% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (77% better than other 2003 vans)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance (72% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.63% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (87% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.63% fail on Rbt (sp) (87% better than other 2003 vans)
          • 0.42% fail on Service brake performance (85% better than other 2003 vans)
          • 0.21% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.42% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (93% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.42% fail on Rbt (sp) (93% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.84% fail on Mechanical brake components (75% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.84% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.84% fail on Brake pads
    • 0.42% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.42% fail on Lever
    • 0.21% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.21% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 1.9% fail on Steering (73% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Steering linkage components (70% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Track rod end (67% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.21% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.21% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.21% fail on Steering wheel
  • 1.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (68% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.84% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.63% fail on Requirements (4 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.21% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 1.7% fail on Tyres (76% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Tread depth (71% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.21% fail on Size/type
    • 0.21% fail on Condition
  • 0.21% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.21% fail on Attachment